It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When Brandy Sobotka-Ramos enrolled her 11-year-old son and nine-year-old daughter in their local charter school, she did not expect it would oblige her to talk to her children about anal sex.
But that’s what she and a number of other parents in the small community of Jerome, Idaho have been facing since last month.
Elementary school-age children enrolled at Heritage Academy were given a survey -- designed for adults – called the Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) survey.
It was created by a physician in 1985 as a means of determining childhood trauma in adults and consists of 10 questions such as, “Did an adult or person at least 5 years older than you ever touch or fondle you or have you touch their body in a sexual way or try to actually have oral, anal, or vaginal sex with you?” Another question is, “Did you often feel that your parents were too drunk or high to take care of you or take you to the doctor if you needed it?” And then this one: “Was a household member depressed or mentally ill or did a household member attempt suicide?”
www.foxnews.com...
Heritage did not seek parental consent before distributing the survey.
brandy Expand / Contract
“My children were required to complete this in class and were told it was not optional, but anonymous unless they chose to include their names,” Sobotka-Ramos told Fox News. “I never dreamed I would be explaining anal and oral to my babies.”
The Idaho Public Charter Schools Commission told Fox News that while they are aware of the matter, it is one more appropriately addressed by the school board. The board, however, did not respond to a request for comment but did issue a statement on its Facebook page thanking parents for their concerns and urging them to reach out to Ivie to schedule an appointment to discuss it further.
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Iamthatbish
Not quite following you , can you translate ( top bit ) well actually the bottom bit as well . Are you saying the teachers ask these questions to catch pedophile parents .
That looks nothing like what that bish is saying. But nice interrogative lead. Played like a true NYC detective...
originally posted by: Hecate666
This shows that your kids are just lent to you by the governments as you are cheap places to feed and clothe them...as long as you bring them up it their way. If you try and bring them up your own way, they get taken away.
I shudder when I read some posts here about asking kids to grass up their parents for smoking or being too drunk.
My parents were the most decent, loving, funny and safe people to bring anyone up, but my mum smoked a lot of cigarettes and there were the odd occasions where they were too drunk and it was funny. That was back in the 70s.
I was a latecomer to the family and felt nothing but security and love, had anyone ripped me out of there when I was young because of my mums smoking or the occasional drinking, I would not have survived mentally intact. I am serious, it would have been the worst thing and I don't know what would have become of me [nothing good, that's for sure as I know my other side].
I am glad my husband and I have no kids by choice and our decision is verified almost every day. I am sooooo glad.
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: TarzanBeta
That looks nothing like what that bish is saying. But nice interrogative lead. Played like a true NYC detective...
Now i am really confused . Thanks for that .
Hah. What I said is that you impressed your non-sequitur through someone else's statement. You could have just said what you did with a general reply instead of making someone else say what you were thinking.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: seasonal
Ahh the adult world of sex, what better to ask elementary school children about that anal sex.
I knew about this in 6th grade. This is where lawyers come from.
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: TarzanBeta
Hah. What I said is that you impressed your non-sequitur through someone else's statement. You could have just said what you did with a general reply instead of making someone else say what you were thinking.
Perhaps my teachers were right .