It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Olivine
a reply to: TrueBrit
I'm standing right next to you, brother, watching.
a reply to: damwel
I agree. It is frightening that his supporters do not recognize his authoritarianism.
I recall Candidate Trump making debate statements like, "As President, the ____________ will do what I tell them to do."
That attitude is comes from being a business owner...and a very successful one at that. I don't think he had any idea of how government REALLY works. Only that it is an entity that takes money, and gave regulations in return.
I'm thankful that Donald Trump didn't know what he's now experiencing, or the man would not have ran for President! By now, we'd be re-entering GRIDLOCK hell, courtesy of Hillary.
You are thankful he doesn't know how government works? I was waiting for someone to twist this into a positive. LOL
WTF are you even talking about?
Government IS the problem!
Guess you haven't paid attention to how far in debt our country is, or how many people are without jobs?
I guess MORE government is what you want???????
I said he doesn't know how the government functions. I didn't say anything about more government or debt.
The only explanation for your response is you think Trump should get rid of the government and then he won't have to know how it works.
You guessed WRONG!
Smaller government does not mean NO Government!
Do you want community activists and lawyers to continue to run this country into oblivion?
Never mind.............
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: reldra
Problem is the OP said "it was reported his admin unsuccessfully tried to bully FBI into lying to the public " No where do I find that is a statement of fact ...OP is lying himself and explains why he didn't provide a link to where it was reported because he made it up ....full cloth ...
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Olivine
a reply to: TrueBrit
I'm standing right next to you, brother, watching.
a reply to: damwel
I agree. It is frightening that his supporters do not recognize his authoritarianism.
I recall Candidate Trump making debate statements like, "As President, the ____________ will do what I tell them to do."
That attitude is comes from being a business owner...and a very successful one at that. I don't think he had any idea of how government REALLY works. Only that it is an entity that takes money, and gave regulations in return.
I'm thankful that Donald Trump didn't know what he's now experiencing, or the man would not have ran for President! By now, we'd be re-entering GRIDLOCK hell, courtesy of Hillary.
You are thankful he doesn't know how government works? I was waiting for someone to twist this into a positive. LOL
WTF are you even talking about?
Government IS the problem!
Guess you haven't paid attention to how far in debt our country is, or how many people are without jobs?
I guess MORE government is what you want???????
I said he doesn't know how the government functions. I didn't say anything about more government or debt.
The only explanation for your response is you think Trump should get rid of the government and then he won't have to know how it works.
You guessed WRONG!
Smaller government does not mean NO Government!
Do you want community activists and lawyers to continue to run this country into oblivion?
Never mind.............
My original response was to someone who was thankful Trump does not know how government works. Not about government big or small. You continue to read all of these unrelated things into what I said.
.....I will address community activists, since you brought them up. Should we be rid of people who are active in helping their community and communicating to government about it?
Shows up no where in the links posted .That has to be the OP's own lying . "pressure" does not equate to lying ,but saying that it was reported does ...That is why he wouldn't answer me ...he couldn't because it was his/her lie .
tried to bully FBI into lying to the public
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: seeker1963
Social issues?
Homelessness? Poverty? Inequality? These being massive drivers of suffering in your country, and yet, you do not care about them, they mean nothing to you? What are more important issues than these? THERE ARE NONE!
The FBI’s activities are closely and regularly scrutinized by a variety of entities. Congress—through several oversight committees in the Senate and House—reviews the FBI’s budget appropriations, programs, and selected investigations. The results of FBI investigations are often reviewed by the judicial system during court proceedings. Within the U.S. Department of Justice, the FBI is responsible to the attorney general, and it reports its findings to U.S. Attorneys across the country. The FBI’s intelligence activities are overseen by the Director of National Intelligence.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: seeker1963
Social issues?
Homelessness? Poverty? Inequality? These being massive drivers of suffering in your country, and yet, you do not care about them, they mean nothing to you? What are more important issues than these? THERE ARE NONE!
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: seeker1963
How about forcing companies to pay ALL the tax they owe, arresting all executives of any company banking off shore? How about forcing private companies to back the hell off out of government, and charge only reasonable amounts for goods and services rendered to it, rather than vying for multi billion dollar contracts which should be much cheaper?
How about making it impossible for companies to either cheat on their taxes, avoid taxes, or to move country in order to reduce the tax burden they face? How about forcing all companies that want to trade with America, to do so from within the country.
How about reducing the military to a border defence only role for the next forty years? I mean, its about time the DoD actually lived up to its name and defended America, rather than attacking other countries. That would save TRILLIONS over the course of just a few years. Oh, and while you are at it, get rid of that mass surveillance initiative. These measures alone would save the vast majority of your money, making it possible for your country to actually take responsibility for its violent and totally unjustifiable behaviour in the Middle East over the last few decades, rather than shrugging it off and hiding behind your Bibles and your guns, quivering in your urine filled boots, which is what you all have been doing about it lately.
Your nation is not yet a corporatist nightmare realm, full exclusively with people who do not take responsibility for their failure to control their government, do not take responsibility for their actions abroad, do not take responsibility for the poor and the homeless (which are recognised effects of capitalism, therefore necessary to the function of capitalist nations, meaning if you want capitalism, you have to, repeat HAVE to support these people and protect them, not shun them). If you do not want it to become an oligarchy, you need to take a turn to the left, not the right, and not the hard right.
originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
Since when has anyone, and I mean ANYONE on this site trusted the FBI or CIA?