It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: AnAbsoluteCreation
Interesting observations.
There's still the problem of the what hit the lightpoles? I can tell you first hand, that subject was beaten to death back in the day. I'm no "Skeptic", and for the longest time remained on the fence, but eventually (when CIT was stomping around) helped lead the charge in bringing Pentagon No Planer noise to a collective close.
My old thread:
First things first: What Hit the Lightpoles?!
I doubt many of the images from that era still work, but the arguments should hold true.
We had many other threads in those days that went on for eternity. I got a pretty good taste for much of them.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
No Planes all begins and ends with the lightpoles.
Anyone who has ever done construction work will laugh at any and all notions that the 'work' on the poles could be done in a jiffy.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: AnkhMorpork
Are you familiar with armored cars? Did you know they dont use steel? Instead they use several thin layers of aluminum. It's the layering that gives them the strength.
So now we have plane wings meant to keep immensely heavy planes full of hundreds of passengers and tons of fuel tens of thousands of feet up in the air at speeds exceeding 500mph (with a service life of years). We're talking 'layers' of alloys out the wazoo (including titanium), we're talking machine milled parts, etc that makes the layering in the walls of an armored bank truck look like crackerjack boxes vs. matchbox cars (the plane wings)...
All that vs. highway grade rolled aluminum pipes attached to the ground with cast aluminum bases. I've seen up close exactly what these materials look like in such a battered state. Hurricane grade yes, but 80 mph truck slamming into them no, the bases are built to break away hence the cast aluminum.
This isn't a comparison of a stoppable force hitting an immovable object. If anything, it was an unstoppable force hitting a movable object.
As I already said and everybody kept ignoring, anyone whose ever done construction work knows there's no way that the 'work' required to do that bang up job via elbow grease couldn't possibly be done in a jiffy. No chance whatsoever.
To do the jobs you'd need the parts pre busted. You'd need to haul them in with flatbed truck(s). You'd need an impact gun (to remove & replace the nuts) the likes of which most people have never seen up close in use (the kind you'd find on big tow trucks that tow big heavy box & semi trucks). You'd need dozens of guys 'trained' to do the construction swap out job alone, taking down poles normally erected with cranes (then whole other special effects teams for the rest of what was seen just up on the highway pavement alone). You'd have to haul in the 'new' poles, and haul out the 'old' ones. And on that part right there the whole thing would never get greenlit. Too risky. Too silly. Too stupid. Not unless everyone on the highway, news helicopters, and every survivor in the Pentagon that could get eyeshot out there for the next hour was all in on it.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
the grass was green all the way up to the wall, which is another marvel,
I dont claim to have all the answers to every aspect, but I know that the grass around those lightpoles would be ground into dirt/mud by the time dozens of big strong burly construction men were out there in work boots with heavy tools, equipment and building materials.
That entire highway scene would have literally become a construction site for the entire duration.
Maybe if you had a impact gun crew per pole, basically a dozen guys per pole working like clockwork maybe it could be done in 20 minutes. That is if they had been practice drill rehearsing at a mock replica site for a couple weeks, and if somehow the logistics of getting all those men, trucks and equipment in and out of there amidst all the choas, witnesses, first responders, traffic jams.
Then, in addition to the grass being all disturbed around this construction site, there would be the threat of other visual evidence of tampering on the pole mounts, along with accidentally forgot a tool or a nut on the ground.
So while all that above is going on then there be something like a dozen plus special effects people out there handling the rest of the scene up on the highway pavement. And they'd have to be able to get in and out with their tools and effects.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Here goes the tool you'd use to swap the nuts on those light pole mounts:
To pull off that job in less than several hours out there, they'd need one of those per crew running simultaneously at each 'swapped' pole (dragging those heavy heavy-duty air hoses through the grass and all).
I've seen one of these in action first hand after being on a cross state run with a max size commercial Ryder truck delivery, and an inner back dualie tire blew out. After sitting out there on the side of a highway service drive on the Ohio Turnpike for over an hour, beginning deep into sundown, out came Jimbob with one of these beasts to change the wheel.
For instance, the 9/11 commission made the claim that the reason the impact hole on the Pentagon was so small is because the airplane hit the ground in front of the Pentagon first.
originally posted by: AnAbsoluteCreation
a reply to: facedye
Yes. The 9/11 commission. I will find it and post here.
Going to bed. I promise I will deliver.
AAC
originally posted by: AnAbsoluteCreation
Then leaving this perfect impact three levels deep into the Pentagon.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: AnAbsoluteCreation
And you're going to manage to do that while removing from dispute the implications on such a notion as the realities of such an operation as I've laid out here?
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: AnAbsoluteCreation
And you're going to manage to do that while removing from dispute the implications on such a notion as the realities of such an operation as I've laid out here?
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: AnAbsoluteCreation
Here's what's needed to handle the Lightpoles Problem already with just how far I've impromptu'd the point:
Well, if you're going even play at 'debunking' the realities of futility I've presented, first you'll need to effectively stage a mock poles swap scene, with a real world pole, where you bring in a pre-busted one, and without a crane just a bunch of dudes you'll have to be able to go in and by hand and without a NOISY 'air impact cannon' remove and replace those nuts that fasten it to the ground. No crane; no disturbing the grass; no heavy duty pneumatic tool. Load and unload from a flatbed truck the poles being swapped, under those constrictions... I'd die to see a video pulling that off on one single pole in less than 20 minutes start to finish in some vacant field absent the chaos and witnesses and obstacles involved in the actual 'field operation'.
Shall I go on??