It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In order to establish their paradigm, CIT must erase any history that contradicts it. The best example of this is the central method of their work, in which their personal interviews of witnesses to the attack are implied to uncover a "real" story beneath the myth, somehow missed by everyone before them. This automatically ejects the entire history of existing eyewitness accounts as invalid and unreliable. Indeed CIT even claims that statements by all previous witnesses are not to be considered. In films like the 'Pentagon Attack Cab Driver Lloyde England's Virtual Confession', only witnesses whom CIT has interviewed are ever mentioned and are referred to as "the witnesses," as though no other witness accounts exist. Those new to analysis of the Pentagon attack might automatically assume that all other witnesses must not be worthy of examining.
Finally, we do not know how many witnesses object to the claims made by "no-Boeing-impact" advocates, but we do know that some do. For example, Pentagon Police Officer, William Lagasse, described by CIT as a North of the Citgo flightpath witness, openly objected to claims of the original flyover advocate -- Dick Eastman -- by writing in to the site which published it:
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:11:40 -0400
From: "Lagasse, William"
Dear Sir rest assured it was a Boeing 757 that flew into the building that day, I was on duty as a pentagon police sgt. I was refueling my vehicle at the barraks k gas station that day adjacent to the aircrafts flight path. It was close enough that i could see the windows had the shades pulled down, it struck several light poles next to rt 27 and struck a trailer used to store construction equipment for the renovation of the pentagon that was to the right of the fueselage impact point. The fact that you are insinuating that this was staged and a fraud is unbelievable. You ask were the debris is...well it was in the building..I saw it everywhere. I swear to god you people piss me off to no end. I invite you and you come down and I will walk you through it step by step. I have more than a few hours in general aviation aircraft and can identify commercial airliners. Have you ever seen photos of other aircraft accident photos...there usually isnt huge amounts of debris left...how much did you see from the WTC?...are those fake aircraft flying into the building. I know that this will make no diffrence to you because to even have a websight like this you are obviously a diffrent sort of thinker.
The Statements of Sgt. William Lagasse AFPN; June 24, 2003
the pentagon had no internal walls on its two lowest floors? is that seriously what you just said?
originally posted by: AnAbsoluteCreation
originally posted by: neutronflux
I am going to go out on the limb here. I would say when human remains are found at the site of an event, the investigation's main goal shifts to finding who and how the remains came to be.
The truth movement that does everything backwards, wants to start from outside the event, and avoids how human remains ended up at the pentagon.
Simple question, how did the remains/DNA of the passengers and crew end up at the pentagon?
You think those bolts were hand tightened? Just grab a wrench and a little lefty loosey and no problemo.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
There's really no need for an air impact truth be known. Coming from working on the oil rigs anything an air impact can do you can do with a socket wrench, and it's not that much slower.
And I would also like someone to explain how and Lloyd'd car was in two different spots on the day with two light poles by his car for photo op?