It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Breaking: President Elect Trump Stuffs Cabinet Full of CFR War Hawks

page: 3
15
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 02:43 AM
link   
a reply to: TrueBrit

Russia and China's war machines are designed to win wars.
The US military machine exists to maximise profits usually at the expense of olive,brown,or yellow people.
It is totally out of control the Pentagon 'lost' 6.5 trillion and not a damn thing happened,
These forces will meet,both Russia and China are preparing their citizens for war
next month,week,year,decade its inevitable as the US wants total domination.




posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 02:49 AM
link   
a reply to: TrueBrit

A truly successful propaganda operation is the kind not recognized as one.

Hell, most of Western Europe has pro-nationalist groups directly being funded and supported by the Kremlin. This has been going on for a while now, and is better researched and uncovered than the USA stuff.

Why drop bombs and send in troops...or even do the whole sanction game when you can just slowly influence the hearts and minds of entire populations over a decade or two?

A lot cheaper in the long run...
edit on 26-11-2016 by Kettu because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 03:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: DrStevenBrule
Time to get over it.

A majority of American citizens were ready for a change of pace with Trump rather than the same old, same old with Hillary.

No amount of complaining or rioting is going to change that.


That would be true if Trump won the popular vote

IF all votes are counted now,do we know the final results in how people voted?



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 03:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Nothing wrong with being hawkish against muslim terrorists.

Nothing wrong at all.


Except when you get it wrong and:

-Bomb innocent civilians from drones
-put people in gitmo who have yet to be put on trial
-put innocent people in Gitmo
-torture suspects
-etc

Or does that not matter cuz they is Arabs? Tell me, if, say, Norway killed American citizens and bombed wedding parties in Seattle, would the yanks be happy with that? Or would it make them HATE Norwegians? See my point?



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 03:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: EightAhoy

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: dreamingawake

WHEN ARE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GOING TO STOP BEING DECEIVED
NEVER!


Deceived, exactly, about what?


That a man who surrounds himself in incredible displays of wealth is one of you guys, speaking for you or gives a hoot about you peasants,

Money is his only concern. You all fell for make America great again. Mark my words, and it's already happening by the way, he will use his presidency to boost his businesses...and that's it.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 04:21 AM
link   
Title is clicky bait if all you have is McFarland.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 04:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Nothing wrong with being hawkish against muslim terrorists.

Nothing wrong at all.


Except when you get it wrong and:

-Bomb innocent civilians from drones
-put people in gitmo who have yet to be put on trial
-put innocent people in Gitmo
-torture suspects
-etc

Or does that not matter cuz they is Arabs? Tell me, if, say, Norway killed American citizens and bombed wedding parties in Seattle, would the yanks be happy with that? Or would it make them HATE Norwegians? See my point?


Go do something about it then, don't sit on the computer and virtue signal.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 04:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Nothing wrong with being hawkish against muslim terrorists.

Nothing wrong at all.


Except when you get it wrong and:

-Bomb innocent civilians from drones
-put people in gitmo who have yet to be put on trial
-put innocent people in Gitmo
-torture suspects
-etc

Or does that not matter cuz they is Arabs? Tell me, if, say, Norway killed American citizens and bombed wedding parties in Seattle, would the yanks be happy with that? Or would it make them HATE Norwegians? See my point?


Go do something about it then, don't sit on the computer and virtue signal.


You don't know me or what I do...so, well done, redundant comment.

Secondly, is it too much to ask if the worlds largest military pot not do the above.

Care to reply more intelligently to my point?



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 05:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Nothing wrong with being hawkish against muslim terrorists.

Nothing wrong at all.


Except when you get it wrong and:

-Bomb innocent civilians from drones
-put people in gitmo who have yet to be put on trial
-put innocent people in Gitmo
-torture suspects
-etc

Or does that not matter cuz they is Arabs? Tell me, if, say, Norway killed American citizens and bombed wedding parties in Seattle, would the yanks be happy with that? Or would it make them HATE Norwegians? See my point?


Go do something about it then, don't sit on the computer and virtue signal.


You don't know me or what I do...so, well done, redundant comment.

Secondly, is it too much to ask if the worlds largest military pot not do the above.

Care to reply more intelligently to my point?


They are enemy combatants, being sent to a military prison awaiting trial in front of a military tribunal. They don't get put in Gitmo unless they were captured in a combat area and shooting back, *or caught doing other terrorist-related activites+
Blame Obama for his unprecedented use of drones.
Do you have irrefutable proof they are innocent?
I have no problem with torture. I guess I've seen too much of what terrorists do to kids.

I've just destroyed all of your points. Redundant post is redundant.


edit on 26-11-2016 by Wardaddy454 because: See *



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 05:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454


They are enemy combatants, being sent to a military prison awaiting trial in front of a military tribunal. They don't get put in Gitmo unless they were captured in a combat area and shooting back,


That's about to change:


A President Donald Trump might push for Americans accused of terrorism to be tried in a military tribunal at the U.S. Navy base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, the Republican nominee told the Miami Herald on Thursday.

“I would say they could be tried there, that would be fine,” Trump said in a brief interview ahead of his speech to home builders in Miami Beach.

Under current federal law, it’s illegal to try U.S. citizens at military commissions. Changing the law would require an act of Congress.


Reliable fake news.

Sure is lucky his party controls Congress. By the way, do you remember Trump saying anything about rolling back the Patriot Act or ending domestic spying? I don't. I seem to remember him saying he would do "worse than waterboard," however.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 06:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: Willtell

I absolutely knew Trump was up to no good. Now I wonder what do Pro ATS Trump supporters have to say about their Messiah?


As already stated previously. We're glad Trump is following through with campaign promises. Now let's see if his way of dealing with ISIS works. I guess you along with others were to busy worrying about taking him out of context instead of listening to what he actually said.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 06:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad

originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: Willtell

I absolutely knew Trump was up to no good. Now I wonder what do Pro ATS Trump supporters have to say about their Messiah?


As already stated previously. We're glad Trump is following through with campaign promises. Now let's see if his way of dealing with ISIS works. I guess you along with others were to busy worrying about taking him out of context instead of listening to what he actually said.


Didn't he promise to drain the swamp? Why is he stocking it with alligators?



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 06:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Nothing wrong with being hawkish against muslim terrorists.

Nothing wrong at all.


Except when you get it wrong and:

-Bomb innocent civilians from drones
-put people in gitmo who have yet to be put on trial
-put innocent people in Gitmo
-torture suspects
-etc

Or does that not matter cuz they is Arabs? Tell me, if, say, Norway killed American citizens and bombed wedding parties in Seattle, would the yanks be happy with that? Or would it make them HATE Norwegians? See my point?


I take great offense to that. I am Norwegian, and we will never stab an ally in the back. We Norwegians are not terrorists, but many Muslims are.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 07:49 AM
link   
a reply to: pompel9

So is the US government, but no one is droning their headquarters.

What's your point? 3danimator2014 was using Norway as an example. The member could just as easily have picked Sweden, Finland or Spain. Taking offence to that is... Well it's somewhat unreasonable.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 10:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: pompel9

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Nothing wrong with being hawkish against muslim terrorists.

Nothing wrong at all.


Except when you get it wrong and:

-Bomb innocent civilians from drones
-put people in gitmo who have yet to be put on trial
-put innocent people in Gitmo
-torture suspects
-etc

Or does that not matter cuz they is Arabs? Tell me, if, say, Norway killed American citizens and bombed wedding parties in Seattle, would the yanks be happy with that? Or would it make them HATE Norwegians? See my point?


I take great offense to that. I am Norwegian, and we will never stab an ally in the back. We Norwegians are not terrorists, but many Muslims are.



Seriously?



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Nothing wrong with being hawkish against muslim terrorists.

Nothing wrong at all.


Except when you get it wrong and:

-Bomb innocent civilians from drones
-put people in gitmo who have yet to be put on trial
-put innocent people in Gitmo
-torture suspects
-etc

Or does that not matter cuz they is Arabs? Tell me, if, say, Norway killed American citizens and bombed wedding parties in Seattle, would the yanks be happy with that? Or would it make them HATE Norwegians? See my point?


Go do something about it then, don't sit on the computer and virtue signal.


You don't know me or what I do...so, well done, redundant comment.

Secondly, is it too much to ask if the worlds largest military pot not do the above.

Care to reply more intelligently to my point?


They are enemy combatants, being sent to a military prison awaiting trial in front of a military tribunal. They don't get put in Gitmo unless they were captured in a combat area and shooting back, *or caught doing other terrorist-related activites+
Blame Obama for his unprecedented use of drones.
Do you have irrefutable proof they are innocent?
I have no problem with torture. I guess I've seen too much of what terrorists do to kids.

I've just destroyed all of your points. Redundant post is redundant.



You destroyed my point with lies. If you think every person in gitmo is a terrorist, I feel sorry for you.

Why don't you read up about all the guys who just happened to be I the area when the Americans picked them up. No proof if any wrong doing.

Next, did you address the bombing of weddings, civilians etc

Lastly, do you think being in gitmo for 15 years without trial is reasonable ?

I'd love you to make a point that sticks, so please, keep trying



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: 3danimator2014

My question was not directed to you, but to the OP. I'm trying to figure out what the OP is shouting about. You deleted the proper citation of such from your quoted response. It looks like this:


originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: dreamingawake
WHEN ARE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GOING TO STOP BEING DECEIVED
NEVER!


As to your null response to me in the OP's stead


That a man who surrounds himself in incredible displays of wealth is one of you guys, speaking for you or gives a hoot about you peasants,


...no need to show your backside with name calling. But, if he is "one of you guys" that's a good thing, right? A billionaire peasant. I'll take it!



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: 3danimator2014

So you support Clinton who used her title, clearances, and position to make billions in profits? Trump is a legit businessman. Not a for profit politician that pockets money for favors to world governments. I'll take Trump over mass corruption any day of the week. War is inevitable.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 12:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Trump promised to go after muslim terrorists.

Now he is appointing people intent on doing exactly that.

Thanks for confirming Trump is following through on his campaign promises.


So did George Bush and how many died?

911 war in Iraq, now Syria, Libya by the same people Trump is hiring

How'd that turn out?



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 04:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Crumbles
a reply to: 3danimator2014

So you support Clinton who used her title, clearances, and position to make billions in profits? Trump is a legit businessman. Not a for profit politician that pockets money for favors to world governments. I'll take Trump over mass corruption any day of the week. War is inevitable.


Nope. Hate Clinton. But trump is far worse.




top topics



 
15
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join