In her first extensive interview in over a decade, the nurse who found Juanita Broaddrick in her hot

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: Christosterone

She was crying,” recalled Norma Rogers, a nurse who worked for Broaddrick, who at the time was a nursing home administrator volunteering for then-Arkansas Attorney General Bill Clinton’s 1978 gubernatorial bid.

“And the thing I think I remember most is that her mouth was all swollen up. It was cut. … Her pantyhose were all ripped,” Rogers stated in dramatic, lengthy new testimony.

In her first extensive interview in over a decade, the nurse who found Juanita Broaddrick in her hotel room immediately after Bill Clinton allegedly raped Broaddrick recounted what she says she witnessed in that room 38 years ago.

Dear Millenials,

If a woman does not want to have consensual sex and you beat her up and then have sex with her you are a violent rapist...
If you habitually commit this crime then you are a serial violent rapist...

Bill Clinton is a predator whose prey have cried out for decades to a deaf, biased media set in force to silence all who would stand in the way of the Clinton Dynasty.

So as Hillary continues her hidden presidential run please remember that she enabled a violent, predatory rapist for nearly 4 decades...

One cannot overstate the horrific nature of Bill Clinton's depravity so I will leave it to yall to read the testimony of his victims...

-Christosterone

Has anyone ever seen Juanita broddrick?

She is not at all attractive....


Bill Clinton is general consensus one of the most charismatic people on the planet.

Why would he (a powerful, super charismatic, wealthy guy) risk it all to rape a woman far below the women that he normally has to beat off with a stick?

None of that makes sense....


I don't think the super sexual playboy who has waves of women and the creepy rapist narrative mix.

You can't have it both ways and the GOP has spent decades selling the playboy theme.


Juanita changed her story multiple times and only came forward years later.

Her friend mysteriously is just now speaking after 30 years.....


Why the right pushes conspiracies that won't
Flip any votes I have no idea. They just preach to the choir and look silly.

Did you really go there?

You are using the 'You are too ugly to be raped' defense for Bill Clinton.

That is truly sad.

a reply to: Christosterone

I learned a few things about the Clinton's from a book
The Clinton Body Count, around the year 2001.

Yet, somehow never heard much about most of the rape allegations
until a year or so ago, so I imagine there are millions of Americans
who, like myself were still in the dark.

Thanks for the post, people deserve to know the truth!

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

Bill Clinton is general consensus one of the most charismatic people on the planet.

Why would he (a powerful, super charismatic, wealthy guy) risk it all to rape a woman far below the women that he normally has to beat off with a stick?

None of that makes sense....

I agree with you. It just does not compute.

Yes, Bill is a womanizer (along with almost all previous presidents).

There is zero reason Bill Clinton would have need to resort to rape.

I have myself been raped. I have never believed Juanita.

originally posted by: Christosterone
a reply to: Quantumgamer1776

Because, as alee' post belies, Millenials are the most likely to not know about his criminal past...

The progressive wing of both generation X and Baby Boomers long ago turned an understandably deaf ear to bill's deptavity...

Revisiting what he actually did long ago stopped working with Clinton acolytes who ignor all who would besmirch their dear leader...

And with the Infallible Queen, the band plays on...

-Christosterone

I am a Millennial (1991) so you weren't baseless in addressing at least me lol. I'm positive there are Millennials out there that are more educated than I on this topic, and some topics perhaps that I am more educated on. But again, thanks for bringing it up, because it's the first I've ever heard of it honestly.


As far as the person doubting her case..... I can understand that. There are women as I've discovered who lie about rape. It sickens me to no end as a real rape victim. But to doubt her credibility based on how attractive you perceive that she is or was...... well that's sick in my opinion. I don't think many people if anyone considered me attractive when I was 15 and raped......and yet, there I was, scared and crying and ashamed and embarrassed and hurt..... any how, I won't dwell on that, because I can't help how you feel rape works. As I said, if you don't believe her that's your prerogative.

-Alee

a reply to: Annee

Do you even understand the motivation for rape? I guess not. It less to do with sex or attractiveness than power. As a rape victim, one would hope you would understand that.

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Annee

Do you even understand the nature of rape? I guess not.

Did you miss the part where I stated "I myself have been raped". And it was definitely about power.

I know, you're gonna pull the Power Trip thing.

I do not agree with you in the case of Bill Clinton.

Some people will believe anything anti-Clinton's - - - just because it is anti-Clinton's.

a reply to: Annee

And some will drink the Clinton kool-aid, despite it being completely contrary to reality or even their own world view.

I was amending my comments while you were typing yours, BTW. FTR.

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Annee

And some will drink the Clinton kool-aid, despite it being completely contrary to reality or even their own world view.

I was amending my comments while you were typing yours, BTW. FTR.

I'm a former Republican who voted for Bush Sr. and Bush W - - as well as Clinton (I did not think his Rep opponents were strong enough).

I've been in online political forums since about 1999.

I followed the story closely. I do not and have never believed Juanita.

originally posted by: NerdGoddess
a reply to: Christosterone

(he did help the deficit issue a teeny bit)

No he didn't. All he did was to take funds that had been set aside for certain things and move them into the General Fund. That made it look like a surplus, until the things that the money was set aside for came due.

It always cracks me up that the Democrats say that the Republicans have declared "War on Women" while they are still kissing Bill Clinton's A$$.

a reply to: Christosterone

With this thread we have political bickering AND ageism. How fun!

Here's a handy list of all the other people that have accused him. Let's not forget that Paula Jones finally won a $850,000 settlement just for sexual harassment. And it was his usual modus operandi - get a state trooper to escort the woman to his room and then stand outside to intimidate her. What would YOU do if the Attorney General, Governor or President assaulted you? Who would you turn to? He's been getting away with this for 30 years. The man belongs in jail for the rest of his life.

Capitol Hill Blue Clinton Rape List

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Don't forget bizarre commentary on rape!

But c'mon man. It's totally the millennials fault. I mean just by "admitting" that I'm barely in the millennial generation, somebody already has me figured out entirely.

Never mind that I can't stand Clinton, so all the personal diatribe was for nothing and only made me question why somebody thinks being a bully and a jackass is a good way to win somebody over politically. But like. Millennials man.

Lulz.

originally posted by: SentientCentenarian
Here's a handy list of all the other people that have accused him. Let's not forget that Paula Jones finally won a $850,000 settlement just for sexual harassment. And it was his usual modus operandi - get a state trooper to escort the woman to his room and then stand outside to intimidate her. What would YOU do if the Attorney General, Governor or President assaulted you? Who would you turn to? He's been getting away with this for 30 years. The man belongs in jail for the rest of his life.

Capitol Hill Blue Clinton Rape List

Who are: Daniel J. Harris & Teresa Hampton (other then Republicans)?

And why are they credible?

originally posted by: Christosterone

biased media set in force to silence all who would stand in the way of the Clinton Dynasty.

So as Hillary continues her hidden presidential run please remember that she enabled a violent, predatory rapist for nearly 4 decades

Ding ding ding ding!!

TPTB dont just want Hillary for president. If they would be able to, they would literally crown Hillary queen of the USA, and after she passed, would crown Chelsea to ensure the continuation of non-stop absolute corruption.

a reply to: Annee

There is zero reason Bill Clinton would have need to resort to rape.

Ted Bundy was charismatic and attractive.
So he must not have raped and killed a minimum of 30 women.... right?

Bundy was regarded as handsome and charismatic by many of his young female victims, traits he exploited to win their trust. He typically approached them in public places, feigning injury or disability, or impersonating an authority figure, before overpowering and assaulting them at more secluded locations.

Wikipedia

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Annee

There is zero reason Bill Clinton would have need to resort to rape.

Ted Bundy was charismatic and attractive.

As are many men.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Annee

There is zero reason Bill Clinton would have need to resort to rape.

Ted Bundy was charismatic and attractive.

As are many men.

The point was made in the post that you were responding to that Bill Clinton had no need to rape because he was charismatic and attractive.
One can be charismatic and attractive and still be a rapist.
That is the point.
I can't believe that you agreed with a poster that said that Juanita Broaderick was 'too ugly' to rape.
Not all rapists 'resort' to rape.
They rape because that is the way that they are wired.
They need to have that power over the victim.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Annee

There is zero reason Bill Clinton would have need to resort to rape.

Ted Bundy was charismatic and attractive.

As are many men.

The point was made in the post that you were responding to that Bill Clinton had no need to rape because he was charismatic and attractive.
One can be charismatic and attractive and still be a rapist.

Thanks for the extremism comparison.

Always valid.

You'd have to believe over a dozen women are lying about Clinton. They are all liars.

Can you imagine of 12 women had been accusing Trump of rape over the last 20 years? ATS would have a whole forum on it and it would be cemented as fact.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Annee

There is zero reason Bill Clinton would have need to resort to rape.

Ted Bundy was charismatic and attractive.

As are many men.

The point was made in the post that you were responding to that Bill Clinton had no need to rape because he was charismatic and attractive.
One can be charismatic and attractive and still be a rapist.

Thanks for the extremism comparison.

Always valid.

Yet Bill Clinton being attractive and charismatic rules out him being a rapist in your book?
My reply proves that it means nothing.

AND again, are you supporting the contention that Juanita Broaderick was 'too ugly' to rape?