It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dreamingawake
IMO the people(non elites) won't be included whether they want to or not. It's really a step for the elites, let 'em go be digital in their path for immortality, leave humanity and the planet be. If the grids crash they better hope they have numerous backups that can't be accessed.
The rapid loss of species we are seeing today is estimated by experts to be between 1,000 and 10,000 times higher than the natural extinction rate.
Unlike the mass extinction events of geological history, the current extinction challenge is one for which a single species - ours - appears to be almost wholly responsible.
This is often referred to as the 6th extinction crisis, after the 5 known extinction waves in geological history.
So without arguing about who’s right or wrong.
Or what the exact numbers are.
There can be little debate that there is, in fact, a very serious biodiversity crisis.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: dreamingawake
IMO the people(non elites) won't be included whether they want to or not. It's really a step for the elites, let 'em go be digital in their path for immortality, leave humanity and the planet be. If the grids crash they better hope they have numerous backups that can't be accessed.
Almost everyone is elite compared to someone else.
The millionaires think the billionaires are, the average joes think the millionaires are
The 3rd world think anyone in the 1st world are elites, etc...
So, its a meaningless statement. It will be available for people who can afford it..and more than likely life insurance companies will cover it..why wouldn't they. you pay them indefinately to remain alive..government would love it as you keep paying taxes without retirement, corporations would keep a consumer buying their stuff for eternity, etc etc...everyone would benefit from a immortal being controlled by such tech.
And as a side bonus, it would force us to push out into space just for purposes of real estate
originally posted by: dreamingawake
Oh, yeah meaningless, the old 1 percent argument that US citizens are 1 percenters. SMH.
You think even the people who don't have a career/job situation setup, will be able to afford it?
Buying what and paying taxes on what; digital products, digital space? Because that's all their will be left to purchase.
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: SaturnFX
Maybe you are. But are humanity as a collective? I think not.
we can't even treat each other decently.
We should have agencies manned with futurists and scientists endlessly evaluating our progress and trying to chart future problems. But do we have anything even resembling that? No,
Let me paint a picture:
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: SaturnFX
It's just a mad dash, progress by any means.. a train with no brakes is a very good description, a train we couldn't stop even if we tried.. and virtually nobody in a position of power or in the public is even asking such questions, I have certainly never heard of anything like it.. We don't thoroughly evaluate the long term effects of the use of our technologies, and specifically not the specific confluence of effects various different technologies will have on us as a whole.
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: SaturnFX
Maybe you are. But are humanity as a collective? I think not. We are doing a terrible job as wardens of this planet's ecosystems and we can't even treat each other decently.
I don't really see how anyone can argue for the responsibility of humanity, we are not very responsible at all. Technological progress has no brakes, prudence doesn't even seem to come into it. We aren't even asking ourselves "should we?" It's just a mad dash, progress by any means.. a train with no brakes is a very good description, a train we couldn't stop even if we tried.. and virtually nobody in a position of power or in the public is even asking such questions, I have certainly never heard of anything like it.. We don't thoroughly evaluate the long term effects of the use of our technologies, and specifically not the specific confluence of effects various different technologies will have on us as a whole.
We should have agencies manned with futurists and scientists endlessly evaluating our progress and trying to chart future problems. But do we have anything even resembling that? No, we have think tanks that serve corporate or government interests.. I don't know, what do we have? And how efficacious, serious and well funded are those institutions?
Almost anything could happen at any time. We're lucky some genetically engineered virus or something hasn't escaped and killed millions of people already. The reality is we're killing off untold numbers of species yearly.
Let me paint a picture:
The rapid loss of species we are seeing today is estimated by experts to be between 1,000 and 10,000 times higher than the natural extinction rate.
Unlike the mass extinction events of geological history, the current extinction challenge is one for which a single species - ours - appears to be almost wholly responsible.
This is often referred to as the 6th extinction crisis, after the 5 known extinction waves in geological history.
So without arguing about who’s right or wrong.
Or what the exact numbers are.
There can be little debate that there is, in fact, a very serious biodiversity crisis.
We're currently the driving force behind a mass extinction event. Do you consider that responsible?
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: SaturnFX
Maybe you are. But are humanity as a collective? I think not.
Many people dont care too much about recycling and such because they feel their life is soo fleeting that they wont be here to watch the final outcome of our disasterous lifestyle. I imagine longevity will certainly make people consider the world differently.
But either way, for now, the only ones making a big wreck of the planet are overpopulated 3rd world nations like china or india. They will, in time, clean up their act as tech becomes available
we can't even treat each other decently.
Hard to believe, but the world is more at peace right now than it ever has been in recorded history. We just have cable news and the internet pumping guilt and fear into our homes 24/7 giving us the impression the world is falling apart.
We should have agencies manned with futurists and scientists endlessly evaluating our progress and trying to chart future problems. But do we have anything even resembling that? No,
Yes..we do..to an absurd extent, hense why things like cloning is banned in the west. its so restrictive that most innovation is most likely going to end up in areas outside of the US/UK simply because we have too many luddites and spiritualists making the laws.
Let me paint a picture:
No, your pictures are grim, pessimistic, and fearful.
I recommend you spend a bit of time reflecting on why you have such mistrust and distaste in humanity.
We have had, for a very long time now, the tech to nuke everyone into oblivion, yet we havent
We have had the tech to genetically create viruses that could wipe out entire nations, specific genetic traits, etc, but we havent.
Humanity is a short lifed spastic life that overall is seeking out goodness and wisdom. if not, this world would be hell on earth if even 10% was genuinely bad. Longevity would help out care, to be here and deal with the lasting effects of your actions. Have some faith in your fellow man.
originally posted by: RedDragon
There's a reason we don't see transhuman-empowered individuals of alien species numbering in the billions running around acting of their own free-will.
But transhumanism is an inevitable technological development.. so it makes you wonder what happens to the free-will of those billions of individuals when it does occur? As it must have already occurred throughout the universe many times already?
I don't know, what do we have? And how efficacious, serious and well funded are those institutions?
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Unfortunately I believe in reincarnation so I'm not so sure that I can escape just by dying. Besides, isn't it kind of selfish to just go "eh, let the new generations figure it out".. and then succumb to apathy?