It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Clinton Emailed Classified Information AFTER Leaving State Dept.

page: 6
35
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 31 2016 @ 04:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Gryphon66

LOL

Hillary's actions are 100% good for the American Citizens.





Nope, she's a politician. I wouldn't trust her as far as I could throw her ... which is still farther than I would trust the washed-up reality TV huckster you seem to lavish such adoration on ...

How many votes is Trump up to now in your total? 18 trillion or so?

Yeah.




posted on Aug, 31 2016 @ 05:17 PM
link   
The document's DECLASSIFICATION DATE (5/28/2023)...indicates that it may have been classified 'at the time' it was sent.
prod-static-ngop-pbl.s3.amazonaws.com...


edit on 31-8-2016 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-8-2016 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2016 @ 07:17 PM
link   
Meet the ‘Little People’: Those Punished for Far Less Than What Clinton Did

Bill Clinton’s National Security Adviser guilty of Destroying Documents in National Archives: ‘Sandy Berger … pleaded guilty in 2005 to illegally sneaking classified documents from the National Archives by stuffing papers in his suit. He later destroyed some of them in his office and lied about it.’

State Department Official Fired and Security Clearance Revoked After Linking to Classified Wikileaks Document: Peter Van Buren, a foreign service officer for Hillary’s State Department, was fired and his security clearance revoked for quoting a Wikileaks document AFTER publishing a book critical of Clinton…

Bill Clinton’s CIA Director Was Pardoned During Plea Negotiations for Storing Classified Data on Home Computer: John Deutch, CIA director under President Clinton, was found to have classified information on a government-owned computer in his home several days after he left the CIA. He had to be pardoned in the middle of plea negotiations by Hillary’s husband.

Navy engineer sentenced for mishandling classified material: Bryan Nishimura of Folsom, California, pled guilty to the unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials during stints in Afghanistan in 2007 and 2008…Nishimura was sentenced to two years probation, fined $7,500, and had to surrender his security clearance.

Sailor Smuggles Classified Docs off Ship: ‘A Navy intelligence specialist admitted Thursday that he smuggled classified documents out of Fort Bragg in folders and his pants pockets, then sold them for $11,500 to a man he believed was a Chinese agent.’

Low Level Submarine Shipmate Prosecuted for Less Serious Crime than Clinton: Petty Officer First Class Kristian Saucier allegedly used a cellphone camera to take photos in the classified engine room of the nuclear submarine where he worked as a mechanic, the USS Alexandria, then destroyed a laptop, camera and memory card after learning he was under investigation. He was indicted on one felony count of unlawful retention of national defense information and another felony count of obstruction of justice.

Marine Corps. Major Caught Sending Classified Documents to Superiors Using Personal Email: Maj. Jason Brezler was dismissed from the Marine Corps when he ‘accidentally took home 14 documents on his personal computer, some of which were classified.’ According to the report, Brezler was ‘in a graduate school class when he received an urgent email from military officials in Afghanistan and sent a specific document in response, using his personal email account.’

Lab Tech Steals Data from Nuclear Facility: Jessica Lynn Quintana, a former worker at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, pleaded guilty in federal court to ‘knowingly removing classified information from the national security research laboratory, after she took home sensitive documents and data from the lab last year.’

NSA Manager gives Classified Info to Newspaper: A National Security Agency manager was indicted on allegations of willful retention of ‘national defense’ or classified information, obstruction of justice and making a false statement, after he allegedly ‘passed classified information to a Baltimore Sun reporter who wrote stories exposing NSA mismanagement.’ Charges were dropped and the NSA manager pleaded to a misdemeanor, in what was called a victory against the Obama administration whom had attempted to use dated laws to prosecute leakers of classified information…

State Dept. Official Steals Classified Docs: Donald Willis Keyser earned over a year in prison when he ‘pled guilty to a three-count Criminal Information in which he admitted that he willfully and unlawfully removed classified documents and digital memory devices from the Department of State to his residence.’ United States Attorney Chuck Rosenberg stated that… ‘His (Keyser’s) sentence of imprisonment is a warning to others in positions of public trust.’


Link



posted on Aug, 31 2016 @ 08:26 PM
link   
The attorney representing a Marine officer accused of mishandling classified information by warning troops in Afghanistan about the threat of an insider attack said he plans to argue that his client deserves the same leniency that Hillary Clinton received.

Link



posted on Aug, 31 2016 @ 08:38 PM
link   
The Government Has Prosecuted Nearly Every Violator of Secrecy Rules Before Hillary Clinton


The FBI is not recommending criminal charges regarding Hillary Clinton’s mishandled classified emails, an act of leniency that is bizarrely out of sync with how Washington traditionally punishes breaches of secrecy.

The Obama administration has filed more charges against those who leak classified information than all previous presidential administrations combined, according to a statement made by CNN’s Jake Tapper that was marked “True” by Politifact. The culture of secrecy in Washington is so prevalent that former CIA and NSA Director Michael Hayden famously said in 2010, “Everything’s secret. I mean, I got an email saying ‘Merry Christmas.’ It carried a top secret NSA classification marking.”

Even seemingly minor violations of these policies are met with little mercy.


Link


Link
edit on 31-8-2016 by Doctor Smith because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2016 @ 12:30 AM
link   
Comey: If Hillary Worked at the FBI, There Would Be ‘Severe’ Consequences


Link



posted on Sep, 1 2016 @ 02:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

You might want to read the last few pages instead of posting the same drivel that's been discussed and dismissed.

That article is garbage, they are not similar or lesser cases.

Try again. This time maybe use a different source than Trumps puppet master.



posted on Sep, 1 2016 @ 07:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
The Government Has Prosecuted Nearly Every Violator of Secrecy Rules Before Hillary Clinton


Rather than jump to the conclusion that Hillary is getting special treatment, doesn't it make more sense that Hillary didn't do what you think she did?



posted on Sep, 1 2016 @ 09:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
The Government Has Prosecuted Nearly Every Violator of Secrecy Rules Before Hillary Clinton


Rather than jump to the conclusion that Hillary is getting special treatment, doesn't it make more sense that Hillary didn't do what you think she did?



Except Hillary Clinton DID do what he thinks she did - that fact is not up for debate.

What is up for debate is Hillary NOT being charged because Comey thinks she didn't act maliciously, while most of these men have been charged with similar crimes and are being prosecuted. That Navy Sailor for example.

He took 6 photographs for personal use that happened to be have a Co fidential security rating. After he found out it was illegal for him to have as he did, he destroyed all devices so the data couldn't be taken. (By foreign agents). Additionally, if I heard the Fox News report right earlier, even the Navy didn't want to charge the guy - that's how insignificant the pictures were.

Compare that case to Hillary Clinton who had over 100 emails, including (if memory serves) 10Top Secret, Special Access only emails - and she gets off Scott free on National television.

Do I believe Clinton had malicious intent when doing what she did? No, as far as intentionally giving away National secrets, but that's not the issue. She showed blatant disregard for National security protocol as SOS. How can we expect her to act as President?

There's no way out of this argument:

Should Hillary have been charged? No?, Because she didn't have malicious intent? ---> Navy Sailor and Marine Major at the very least should get off. They haven't, thus, Clinton got preferential treatment.

Should Hillary have been charged? Yes? She didn't, hence she got preferential treatment and this is proof Obama's DOJ is corrupt.



posted on Sep, 2 2016 @ 02:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: chuck258

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
The Government Has Prosecuted Nearly Every Violator of Secrecy Rules Before Hillary Clinton


Rather than jump to the conclusion that Hillary is getting special treatment, doesn't it make more sense that Hillary didn't do what you think she did?



Except Hillary Clinton DID do what he thinks she did - that fact is not up for debate.


Apart from the fact that it clearly is up for debate and you don't have anything to back up your claim that she did do exactly what another forum member thinks she did. Unless you are also said forum member I'd say you've misused the word FACT, maybe you don't understand what it's meaning or you just wanted to hide the fact that your statement is an opinion and not a fact.

Either way you were wrong. Have a nice day.



posted on Sep, 2 2016 @ 04:02 AM
link   
Wow, the hillary CTR squad is out in force for this one.

I haven't heard too much about this, yet.

She can pretend she is still SoS or some other high official in her world.





posted on Sep, 2 2016 @ 01:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Wow, the hillary CTR squad is out in force for this one.

I haven't heard too much about this, yet.

She can pretend she is still SoS or some other high official in her world.




Aww, as soon as you resort to calling people CTR you know the Trumpettes are desperate.

Lol.

Its the equivolent of losing an argument and going "YEAH! Well you probably get paid to post on here"

Your losing the argument and accusing them of making money off it. Brilliant.

edit on 2-9-2016 by SudoNim because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2016 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: SudoNim

The FBI released some documents about their Hillary investigation today.

Get ready to defend.

Some of the quotes from Hillary are very damaging.




posted on Sep, 2 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

22 emails were TOP SECRET and can't be released to the public,she is NOW throwing her aides under busses so the ship is burning now
HERE is a WHOLE PDF ther Forum lawyer UCMJ: .....www.jamesmadisonproject.org... nd%20National%20Security%20Cases.pdf
C. Death penalty eligible charges

1. Art 104 – Aiding the enemy (if referred capital). Any person who aids, or
attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other
things, is guilty of aiding the enemy. Further, any person who, without proper
authority, harbors, protects or gives intelligence to or communicates or
corresponds with the enemy, either directly or indirectly, is guilty of this offense.
“Enemy” is defined in Part IV, paragraph 23c.(1)(b) of the MCM and includes
organized forces of the enemy in the time of war, any hostile body that our forces
may be opposing, and includes civilians as well as members of hostile military
establishments. For the offense of aiding the enemy, either a court-martial or a
military commission may award the death penalty. This is the most applicable of
the death penalty offenses to instances of a service member assisting a terrorist
organization such as Al Qaida


Civilian law.:
US Code 793 /F

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
DIDN'T she out an Iranian AGENT?
edit on 2-9-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-9-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-9-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2016 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

I predict a ramping up as she crashes and burns then comes Bernie.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: SudoNim

The FBI released some documents about their Hillary investigation today.

Get ready to defend.

Some of the quotes from Hillary are very damaging.



*yawn*... It must be close to the 100th time you've said "very damaging" and it turns out to have zero impact.

Goodluck, I look forward to you spamming the creation of numerous new threads of the next few days in a desperate attempt to make it look important



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 12:18 PM
link   
.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 11:28 PM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

Did you know discussing information in the public domain that is classified will still get redacted by the government?

Example: While in the Air Force when the Snowden leaks happened. Even though all the information was public knowledge as a member of the DOD I could not even click on an article about the leaks under threat of breaking the rules.
Or when the drone stories broke we were directed to not look at the article because it contained classified information.

Something being classified or redacted doesn't make it, to use technical terms, "super secret squirrel" information that could threaten national security.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 11:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Yes they do the same with CONFIDENTIAL I've held SECRET myself.




top topics



 
35
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join