It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CAUGHT ON VIDEO=> Hillary Supporters Commit Voter Fraud in Nevada

page: 3
44
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Gryphon66

Then why did she flee?


How does "fleeing" prove that she works for the Clinton campaign ... exactly?

Take the quotation hash marks away from your question. She fled.


Okay:

How does fleeing prove that she works for the Clinton campaign, oh purveyor of the specious?

I understand your need to downplay that part. You tell me why she fled.




posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:15 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr


Fake registration voter cards have been used illegally in past elections, but go ahead and feign ignorance.


That's actual voter fraud which is not what is being alleged in the OP. What's being alleged in the OP is that woman was supporting Clinton and assisting in voter registration which is not illegal in most jurisdictions (and actually is quite common) while voter fraud is obviously illegal everywhere because... it's fraud.


If she wasn't doing anything illegal she wouldn't have left in such a hurry.


That's certainly possible. It's also possible that she wasn't doing anything illegal and she was being confronted by a loud man with a camera (who may or may not have been alone) who was accusing her of breaking a law, demanding things from her and telling her he worked for the Trump campaign.

Let's not forget that Breitbart specifically has been caught in video editing shenanigans (Shirley Sherrod, the ACORN "pimp" video, etc) and Trump hired the king of that sh#show to be his "campaign CEO."

Are you denying that?



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:15 PM
link   
She's owner of a research group.

Someone needs to prove she was doing something other then research.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Gryphon66

Then why did she flee?


How does "fleeing" prove that she works for the Clinton campaign ... exactly?

Take the quotation hash marks away from your question. She fled.


Okay:

How does fleeing prove that she works for the Clinton campaign, oh purveyor of the specious?

I understand your need to downplay that part. You tell me why she fled.


Nope. You made the claim.

I don't think you can prove a connection to the Clinton campaign; you're making that painfully obvious.

You can't back up your claim. It's okay.
edit on 22-8-2016 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:17 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian


That's actual voter fraud which is not what is being alleged in the OP. What's being alleged in the OP is that woman was supporting Clinton and assisting in voter registration

Thanks for agreeing with me. You're right there is no proof she was illegally registering people. But then again, and again, why did she leave so suddenly in a vehicle with out of state license plates?

Connect the dots...



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


Nope. You made the claim.

I'm not 'claiming' she fled, thats what she did.

Instead of saying that doesn't mean anything, please explain why she fled the scene?



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Gryphon66


Nope. You made the claim.

I'm not 'claiming' she fled, thats what she did.

Instead of saying that doesn't mean anything, please explain why she fled the scene?



I don't know and neither do you.

Now, does this flight prove that she was working for the Clinton campaign OR NOT?

You've diverted the question long enough; answer or be ignored.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
She's owner of a research group.

Someone needs to prove she was doing something other then research.



Can you provide a link or something so I can read-up on that aspect?



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


I don't know and neither do you.

chuckle... oh yes I do.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:25 PM
link   
a reply to: JacKatMtn
Thank you for posting this and bringing it to our attention. In an election that has seen Hillary breaking the law time and time again I think it is important to point this out even if TPTB will not act.

I'm sorry that all the Hillary supports are already attacking you to let you know she did nothing wrong.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Gryphon66


I don't know and neither do you.

chuckle... oh yes I do.


Prove it. *chortle*



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: JacKatMtn
Thank you for posting this and bringing it to our attention. In an election that has seen Hillary breaking the law time and time again I think it is important to point this out even if TPTB will not act.

I'm sorry that all the Hillary supports are already attacking you to let you know she did nothing wrong.



Who has attacked the OP please?

Oh, that's right, no one.

Who has stated that Hillary Clinton has done nothing wrong?

Oh, that's right, no one.

Who has proved that the lady in this video was working for the Clinton Campaign?

Oh, that's right .... no one.

Pfft.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Annee
She's owner of a research group.

Someone needs to prove she was doing something other then research.



Can you provide a link or something so I can read-up on that aspect?


Sorry. Shoulda/coulda/woulda


impactresearchinternational.com...



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Annee
She's owner of a research group.

Someone needs to prove she was doing something other then research.



Can you provide a link or something so I can read-up on that aspect?


Sorry. Shoulda/coulda/woulda


impactresearchinternational.com...


Good work there.




posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:44 PM
link   


Under Nevada Revised Statute 293.505(10), while registering a voter, a field registrar shall not: (a) Solicit a vote for or against a particular question or candidate; (b) Speak to a voter on the subject of marking his or her ballot for or against a particular question or candidate; or (c) Distribute any petition or other material concerning a candidate or question which will be on the ballot for the ensuing election.


She is still apparently in violation of law by carrying anti-Trump material.

Nothing else needs to be said!



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Martin75



Under Nevada Revised Statute 293.505(10), while registering a voter, a field registrar shall not: (a) Solicit a vote for or against a particular question or candidate; (b) Speak to a voter on the subject of marking his or her ballot for or against a particular question or candidate; or (c) Distribute any petition or other material concerning a candidate or question which will be on the ballot for the ensuing election.


She is still apparently in violation of law by carrying anti-Trump material.

Nothing else needs to be said!


Is she a County-appointed Field Registrar?



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
She is registering voters. Doesn't say "county appointed" anywhere in that statue. It just says a "field registrar" which is anyone in the field.


edit on 8/22/2016 by Martin75 because: spelling



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: Gryphon66
She is registering voters. Doesn't say "county appointed" anywhere in that statue. It just says a "field register" which is anyone in the field.



You need to read the context of the law.

Then get back to us.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Martin75



Under Nevada Revised Statute 293.505(10), while registering a voter, a field registrar shall not: (a) Solicit a vote for or against a particular question or candidate; (b) Speak to a voter on the subject of marking his or her ballot for or against a particular question or candidate; or (c) Distribute any petition or other material concerning a candidate or question which will be on the ballot for the ensuing election.


She is still apparently in violation of law by carrying anti-Trump material.

Nothing else needs to be said!


That is actually not what would cause the violation. It would be if she was distributing material concerning a candidate. From what the video shows, she wasn't doing that.

She did claim she was carrying voter pledges for Hillary, but the video doesn't show her handing them out, so the video actually doesn't show her doing anything illegal.

Now, concerning the anti trump picture...absolutely nothing illegal about that.

There is also a distinction to be made about if she is an official county registrar or if she is working as part of a larger voter drive. It also matters if she is actually registering them or just encouraging them to go register to vote. And finally, it also matters when (if she did) hand out any Clinton material, before or after she registered the individual.

Bottom line, the video shows absolutely nothing illegal.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Gryphon66

Then why did she flee?


How does "fleeing" prove that she works for the Clinton campaign ... exactly?





No idea.. But she wouldn't flee if she wasn't doing anything wrong.



new topics

top topics



 
44
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join