It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: logicsoda
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: logicsoda
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: logicsoda
I don't believe the evidence, the lack of fossils may be easily excused by you, that's your choice. I remain unconvinced
That's entirely up to you. Quite frankly I think you would still remain "unconvinced" even if there was an abundance of fossils and they all smacked you in the face.
Your arguments about light and speed, they are strawman arguments, they are things we see and can still be tested, totally irrelevant in context
They are not strawmen arguments whatever. A strawman argument would be if I were to misrepresent your position and attack that position... what I was doing was making the claim that there are certain assumptions that we make based on evidence that has been previously required, and that they are ubiquitous in the realm of science--such was a response to your claim "It's assumption till we find evidence, and real science doesn't assume".
It is entirely up to me, well done you
The lack of fossil evidence is not an issue that we struggle with just for our friend the giraffe, we also have one or two other problems with the fossil record but hey, you can dismiss the millions of invisible fossils and assume they can't be found because or yet
It's assumption
Now you have produced two strawman, one about weights falling from somewhere and the speed of light, both observable and testable and hardly related
Go do a little study
Trying to educate you further would be an effort in futility. Continue to believe in whatever nonsense you believe, just be sure to bring your children up not thinking the way you do (assuming you have/will ever have children). It is very seriously flawed.
originally posted by: logicsoda
and the assumption is made that the speed of light is a constant based on previous experimentation and observation. Assumptions are everywhere in science.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Gosh, I hope you dont have children and never do as well, brainwashing them into believing that science is assumption and that they are just animals and what a silly thing I am saying
Comparing evolution to an objects fall to Earth, the speed of light whichincidentallymay not be a constant based on previous experimentation and observation.
See cowboy, you could be wrong, the assumption could be wrong, your whole argument could be wrong, its an assumption
Now try and stay on topic, try be a big boy, leave my children out of this argument.
Deal with the topic at hand
and please research the speed of light assumption you seemed to have failed on
I mean thats funny, you have to laugh at that dont you
Saying the speed of light is a constant based on assumption and modern science has corrected that light is variable and you think the old assumption is right.
Pure Gold
Gosh, I hope you dont have children and never do as well, brainwashing them into believing that science is assumption and that they are just animals and what a silly thing I am saying
originally posted by: Winstonian
a reply to: Raggedyman
This is what I am talking about....
Gosh, I hope you dont have children and never do as well, brainwashing them into believing that science is assumption and that they are just animals and what a silly thing I am saying
What a rotten ungodly think to say to another human being. The same thing could be said about you, in regards to "brainwashing."
It sounds like you have a beef with anyone that does not believe in God. It sounds like you might have a beef with anyone that doesn't believe in things the way that you do.
Behavior like this is the #1 reason that religion disgusts me. Religious people are so quick to judge others, and have absolutely no respect for other people's points of view and look down on others. If that is what believing in God is, then I want no part in it.
If you need to defend your belief system by attacking other people's opinions, then it sounds like you might not have as much faith as you pretend to have.
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: SLAYER69
whatever it is we were designed/created to finally accomplish.
Really? Why do you think we are anything other than another branch of life? Assuming homo sapien had never come into being, assuming none of the forebears to homo sapien had come into being, do you think every other species of life - plant or animal - would have missed us? I'm not so sure an arrogance that we are somehow the best of breed holds true personally, and without our footprint, maybe the world would be in a much better place.
If you look at the events that culminated in where our planet is now, anyone of which could have seen our chances to exist dashed, I do hold some thoughts around the possibility of a divine creator for our world - if that was for our species or not (or if indeed any species was targeted) is a different matter.
"God has no wish for any other means of perfecting his creation than by our help. He will not reveal his Kingdom until we have laid its foundations"
"We are living in an unsaved world, and we are waiting for redemption in which we have been called upon to participate in a most unfathomable way"
~ Martin Buber, Theologian
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: doclec
If we were designed, its a terrible designer. Who designs an air tube that is shared with a food tube?
Someone who wanted a compact neck, also can you think of a reason it might be better that way, think about it logically
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Just wondering why you didnt challenge logicsoda for bringing my children into this discussion or even bringing them up?
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: doclec
If we were designed, its a terrible designer. Who designs an air tube that is shared with a food tube?
Someone who wanted a compact neck, also can you think of a reason it might be better that way, think about it logically
what about all of these flaws in the human anatomy?
io9.gizmodo.com...
The Dual Function of the Pharynx
This is one of the most problematic "features" of the human body — and the cause of innumerable deaths throughout human history. Like many other primates, we're forced to use the same anatomical structure for both ingestion and respiration. But when obstructed, airflow is blocked, which can lead to choking, and in some cases, death.
Our Inability to Biosynthesize Vitamin C
Vitamin C plays a crucial role as an anti-oxidant and in collagen synthesis. But certain animals, such as primates, guinea pigs, and some bats and birds, have completely lost the ability to synthesize this compound. So, when Vitamin C-rich food sources are scarce, such as fruits, we experience a weakened immune response — not to mention scurvy in extreme cases.
The Awkward Wiring of the Male Urinary Tract
The urinary tract in males passes through — rather than being routed around — the prostate gland, which can swell and block urinary function.
The Close Proximity of our Genitals to our Rectum
Not only is this aesthetically displeasing, it's also unhygienic. Combined with our short urethras — especially in women — this leads to frequent urinary tract and bladder infections (UTIs) (remember, front to back, ladies). As the character Darald quipped in Forgetting Sarah Marshall, "Let me just say that if God was a city planner he would not put a playground next to a sewage system."
Our Over-Loaded Lower Backs
This is also a consequence of our transition from four-legged to two-legged creatures. According to paleoanthropologist Bruce Latimer of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio:
When humans stood upright, they took a spine that had evolved to be stiff for climbing and moving in trees and rotated it 90 degrees, so it was vertical—a task Latimer compared to stacking 26 cups and saucers on top of each other (vertebrae and discs) and then, balancing a head on top. But so as not to obstruct the birth canal and to get the torso balanced above our feet, the spine has to curve inwards (lordosis), creating the hollow of our backs. That's why our spines are shaped like an "S." All that curving, with the weight of the head and stuff we carry stacked on top, creates pressure that causes back problems—especially if you play football, do gymnastics, or swim the butterfly stroke. In the United States alone, 700,000 people suffer vertebral fractures per year and back problems are the sixth leading human malady in the world. "If you take care of it, your spine will get you through to about 40 or 50," said Latimer. "After that, you're on your own."
Our Achy Knees
Again, an aftereffect of bipedalism. We have to distribute all our weight on just two limbs, which often leads to aches and pains. You can also add achy, or arthritic hips, to this list.
Our Inefficient Sinuses
Humans have several sinuses — air-filled cavities that help with drainage of mucus and fluid. But our maxillary sinuses, located on our cheekbone, drain upwards. This often leads to the build-up of fluids and mucus, which can cause an infection.
The "Blind Spot" in Our Eyes
Our so-called "blind spot" is the result of a quirk that happens during embryological development. To deal with this, we've had to evolve elaborate and costly perception-correcting mechanisms.
originally posted by: logicsoda
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Just wondering why you didnt challenge logicsoda for bringing my children into this discussion or even bringing them up?
Probably because you said "I hope you never have children" vs what I said, which was "Continue to believe in whatever nonsense you believe, just be sure to bring your children up not thinking the way you do (assuming you have/will ever have children). It is very seriously flawed."
originally posted by: doclec
a reply to: Raggedyman
There is no logic to it, otherwise whats the point of a giraffe from a design standpoint? If you are an intelligent design supporter I think you have to examine your position mich closer. Why design an appendix, if it can kill you? Why design tonsils? Why design a cell that can backfire and destroy the whole body. Are these really "intelligent" designs?