It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Its just too bad that all of these people that are dissatisfied with both candidates don't wake up and give real consideration to either Johnson or Stein.
Trump is the one wondering why he can't "just use nukes." Think about that.
"Several months ago, a foreign policy expert on the international level went to advise Donald Trump. And three times [Trump] asked about the use of nuclear weapons. Three times he asked at one point if we had them why can't we use them," Scarborough said on his "Morning Joe" program.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: MrSpad
Considering the biggest criminal charge even talked about for Clinton was a misdemeanor I am guessing Obama would just pay the fine.
How about treason for arming the Islamic State with weapons procured in Libya?
originally posted by: shell69
a reply to: VictorVonDoom
I agree, NO need for anything quite that dramatic. IF everyone does their research and makes an informed decision, there is NO WAY a Clinton is going to be elected again! Hopefully, that means Trump is our next PRESIDENT!
Think about this, if HRC is elected that would mean a total of 20 years in the White House for the Clinton's.
I know you aren't a Trump supporter either. We still both like Bernie. Except for the label of "socialist" he had the cleanest record of any candidate that ran this year, and had such strong integrity.