It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: madmac5150
Would he own up to his crimes?
Hilary's crimes at Obama's State Department?
Would he incite WW3 as a means to escape potential prosecution?
Would he incite WWIII as a means to escape potential persecution?
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: madmac5150
Would he own up to his crimes?
Exactly what crimes would they be?
Hilary's crimes at Obama's State Department?
Exactly what crimes would they be?
Would he incite WW3 as a means to escape potential prosecution?
What "potential prosecution" are you babbling about?
originally posted by: SuspiciousTom
You make it sound like a cakewalk to just start ww3 kill millions of people and then live to brag about it. :| But on the other hand, it doesn't seem like "Just money" it'd be hard to believe they'd spend billions to make themselves a few millions. There are better ways. I mean it could be. But I just can't understand how people heading a country still fighting over the thing they control, a piece of engineered tree with no real value outside the scope of our false reality.
originally posted by: madmac5150
It was a "what if" question...
Would he incite WW3 as a means to escape potential prosecution?
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: madmac5150
Would he incite WW3 as a means to escape potential prosecution?
You do realize that there are checks and balances in place so the President simply cannot incite WW3 by himself right?
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: madmac5150
Well the thing about a ww3 now as compared to one during the cold war? There would be survivors of one during the cold war, only Russia and the US had nukes for the majority of that time. Nothing compared today's global armament of nukes. One today equals we all die, no winners possible.
originally posted by: madmac5150
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: madmac5150
Would he incite WW3 as a means to escape potential prosecution?
You do realize that there are checks and balances in place so the President simply cannot incite WW3 by himself right?
Ahhhhh.... so naive....
All it actually requires is Presidential Authorization, and a member of The Joint Chiefs, if memory serves. It may have changed.
Our systems (and the Russian's) are designed for quick response... if NORAD reports a launch of enemy missiles, we get ours in the air as quick as possible.
Obama has half of the key to world destruction. Think of that.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: madmac5150
It was a "what if" question...
So not based on any form of reality....
What if Trump running for President is just a plan by his hair to force everyone to wear a merkin?