DNC strips Wasserman Schultz of convention speaking slot

There will be a lot of Bernie supporters turning to Trump, a lot more now that the truth of this primary rigging is out in the open. Without the super delegates combined with this primary fixing out in the open, Bernie would actually win the nomination away from Clinton.

That is how weak of a candidate she really is, they had to cheat just to beat a Socialist.

originally posted by: interupt42

It appears to me that there is no better evidence of a rigged system than having Hillary elected. Those emails just confirms it further.

Yes, true true. Even Obama knows ...
These emails may prove to be more damning than her classified emails!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burntheships

No matter what he's still the crazy inexperienced I don't have a clue how this works candidate who can't get his own party to support him. Sooooooo.

Better than the crazy EXPERIENCED I don't have a clue how this works candidate who HAS TO GET HER own party to CHEAT TO support HER. Sooooooo

You already know you are getting crazy inexperienced with her, their is a .001% chance you might not with Trump.

I don't like trump nor do I believe in the GOP or the DNC, but Hillary and the DNC have done the impossible and made Trump look like the sane decision in 2016.

a reply to: Swills
Not to mention the HUUUGE Clinton payolla to ol Whassername (most likely) . Even though everyone was calling Deb out for her actions , she just admitted it and walked on.Finally , ousted for what she is. A Hillary shill .
Bernie DESERVED a chance. A chance that was taken away before the battle began.

a reply to: interupt42

Lets not forget about Seth Rich, two shots in the back
he was gunned down. Coincidence?

I don't think so.

a reply to: Swills

I agree, she should step down. The leaked e-mails have proof that her staff was conspiring to get Clinton to be the presidential nominee.

Clinton seems pretty corrupt to me, she has this new scandal involving the DNC and her mishandling of classified information and possibly lying under oath.

a reply to: interupt42

If that were true but it's not. She's got more experience in her pinky than trumps entire organisation including his stabilizer pence.

a reply to: darkbake

Umm the mishandling of classified thing has been addressed and guess what. As expected they find she didn't commit a crime. So she's not answering those questions or facing that still.

What keeps you guys from moving on?
It's over.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: interupt42

If that were true but it's not. She's got more experience in her pinky than trumps entire organisation including his stabilizer pence.

Its absolutely true. She has more EXPERIENCE IN THE CORRUPTED SYSTEM then trump AND has shown that she is MORE CORRUPTED and UNETHICAL than Trump, by having her HUSBAND meet with the Attorney General during an FBI criminal investigation ABOUT HER.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: interupt42

If that were true but it's not. She's got more experience in her pinky than trumps entire organisation including his stabilizer pence.

If the experience you mentioned is related to corruption and deceit, then you are correct.

Honesty is one of those things, hilley has yet to experience!

Hang her!

a reply to: interupt42

What corruption though? There's nothing. N o t h I n g. Nothing.
Trials and hearings and investigations and what? What have ya got?
Someone telling you she's corrupt without a shred of evidence that she actually is. It's laughable really. Msm laughs at it too.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: darkbake

Umm the mishandling of classified thing has been addressed and guess what. As expected they find she didn't commit a crime. So she's not answering those questions or facing that still.

What keeps you guys from moving on?
It's over.

A ruling brought about through backroom coercion within a corrupt system does not true innocence make. The laws are broken in this country. Cry innocent all you want, none of us are buying it. Anyone not of the elite would be in prison, she's got the good ole Monopoly "get out of jail free" card and that's the truth.

You can scream at the top of your lungs she's not guilty of a crime all you want, but no one has to respect a decision we know came about through corruption that itself is treason and destroying the very rule of law we're all supposed to be able to rely on.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: darkbake

Umm the mishandling of classified thing has been addressed and guess what. As expected they find she didn't commit a crime. So she's not answering those questions or facing that still.

What keeps you guys from moving on?
It's over.

You keep saying that... and the FBI director never said that... I challenge you to show me the quote.

He said nobody would take it to court, he did not say she did not commit a crime... the two statements are wildly different.

a reply to: AlaskanDad

Wow daddy o you're really hurting me.
She's not getting hung though. That's where we are. She's not guilty of any crime and chants of lock her up don't mean a blasted thing. Not now not ever.

a reply to: Sillyolme

What corruption though? There's nothing. N o t h I n g. Nothing. Trials and hearings and investigations and what?

So you think that Al Capone was only guilty of IRS fraud. LOL

Its amusing watching the willingness of Hillary supporters make themselves look naive, at the expense of trying to justify the Clinton scandals, lies, conflict of interest, and above the law activities.

Honestly I'm beginning to think that that the biggest threat to Hillary is her supporters.

a reply to: Irishhaf

I'm sorry I keep saying what? Did the FBI say she's guilty of a crime but we just can't prove it? No they said there's no crime. They said no one with a brain cell would even think she committed a crime. That's what I heard.
O I also heard him try and convict her in the court of public opinion. I've met several members of that particular jury right here but I didn't hear and neither did anyone else hear that she's guilty of anything.
Still you say I keep saying something and I don't know what it is you want me to verify since you don't say.

Wildly different? Where are the charges then? He said no reasonable person would bring charges against her. How do you interpret that as she's guilty but....

a reply to: TinfoilTP

I wouldn't show my face there if I were her.

a reply to: Sillyolme


C.T.R. must pay well.

originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: Sillyolme


C.T.R. must pay well.

That accusation is getting old. If you have to resort to that claim, perhaps you need to work on your argument.

Just because someone does not think like you does not mean they are paid to say it.

a reply to: Sillyolme

So where is the statement she is innocent?

=============

On topic..

This convention should actually be interesting to watch as people sift through the emails and see what else is in them... should at least be interesting to watch them two step and deflect.