It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: abe froman
The vast majority of Muslims that aren't physically perpetrating the acts are supporting them monetarily and philosophically and refuse to condemn them.
What an ignorant statement. The majority of peaceful Muslims (which are a majority of Muslims) condemn ISIS and what they are doing.
In nations with significant Muslim populations, much disdain for ISIS
Please stop stating lies and assumptions as if they are fact.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: awareness10
Did you competely ignore the link I provided? Because there's no reason you should even be asking that question if you clicked it and read it.
originally posted by: syrinx high priest
any loss or rights for a muslim US citizen will just lead to loss of rights for the rest of us
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: awareness10
Did you competely ignore the link I provided? Because there's no reason you should even be asking that question if you clicked it and read it.
So your philosophy is "guilty until proven innocent"? How very just of you.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: CaticusMaximus
The thing that links them all together is that they own guns, I think that's enough of a link to surveil them. I'm sure they all share the ideology that they deserve to own a gun.
Also, not all Muslims share the ideology that infidels should die and have their heads cut off, just as not all gun owners believe they should kill a whole bunch of random people in a mass shooting, yet we want to surveil all Muslims but not all gun owners?
Why are we setting a double standard here? There has never been a shooting that didn't involve a gun owner, with the logic of Muslim surveillance supporters that should be reason enough to surveil all gun owners as well.