It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BREAKING: DNC To Be Hit With GIANT Lawsuit Over Fraud & Collusion

page: 3
35
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 26 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: boncho
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss


"Both" parties do the same thing, and they work together to stomp out the third parties.

Guccifer for President!



You mean Russia?

Guccifer 2.0 is the Russian government

It's no secret Russia wants Trump to win the election. They haven't made any ground with Hillary as SoS, and they don't want her cabinet in the oval office. Trump on the other hand has Putin's balls on his chin while making statements about Geopolitical climate. Stating he's a better leader than the US President and other political gaffs (even if that's true you don't compare an enemy state and say they're better in any way than your own leader)

He's also commented on weakening NATO positions, etc-so it really should be no surprise Russia would rather have Trump in office over Hillary.


However, considering a long trail of breadcrumbs pointing back to Russia left by the hacker, as well as other circumstantial evidence, it appears more likely that Guccifer 2.0 is nothing but a disinformation or deception campaign by Russian state-sponsored hackers to cover up their own hack—and a hasty and sloppy one at that.


motherboard.vice.com...

As much as anyone might hate Hillary (and Im not condoning or endorsing Hillary or the DNC) but you are basically just letting Russia control your vote, and your nation by buying the Guccifer 2.0 ruse and jumping onto this bandwagon.

I've said for years now, anyone involved in Conspirology... (the name this hobby had before CIA coined "Conspiracy Theorist" as a pejorative term/activity-see:memo on JFK disinfo circa '60s, see:Google NGram on "conspiracy Theorist") ...should not play into nor care about politics at all. Unless it's concerning a political conspiracy.

The political conspiracy is not what the DNC or Hillary did, it's what Russia is trying to do to control the US nation. If you are going to condemn the DNC and Hillary, then you need equal facts (open books or leaks) on the RNC. And its largely why any conspiracy minded people should step outside of politics all together.

When this hobby or type of thought, or activism or whatever you want to call it, when it originated online, it was in usenets, BBS, IRC chats, newsletters, forums, etc-and no one cared nor acknowledged politics. The whole premise of this topic is that the government and groups with ill intentions or subversive intentions are lying to accomplish some end. The whole point is to uncover these lies or gain better understanding of them. Not involve yourself in them.

Government = bad, people = good. That's the general theories this subject is built off of. No individual government agent is to be followed, commended, supported, etc-unless they have done something to disclose, uncover-truth, change-status-quo, declassify, illuminate-truth, etc.

Trump has a history of lining his own pockets and abusing the system as he sees fit (bankruptcy) to line his own pockets and maintain himself as 1%. He is not anyone's hero. Neither is the DNC or Hillary. But to condemn any of these actors (in an ongoing election) without equal evidence and knowledge about all of them, is to be a tool for political end games, in this case, likely Russia. A country that not only abuses and silences its own people, would not hesitate to do much worse to people living outside of it.


Horesh!t. If Gucci Fer were a Russian asset he would have been terminated prior to capture.




posted on Jun, 26 2016 @ 10:07 PM
link   
a reply to: boncho

Sorry, but the spooky Russians aren't enough to stop this already rolling ball. The thing that you (and the Russians apparently) aren't taking into account is that Clinton is one of the only people Trump can beat. He wouldn't stand a chance against Sanders, wouldn't stand a chance against Jill Stein, there are many alternatives for if Clinton gets knocked out of the race.



posted on Jun, 26 2016 @ 11:33 PM
link   
Not enough time. People have made up their minds in droves. Those that are STILL swing voters, either dumb, unbeknownst to the modern political environment or just playing the fence like many on ATS, simply must be too far a few between.

If it's theres one thing the Elita-Cryptocracy know how to do and that is Divide a people. This election is immaculately divisive. It's a con of epic proportions.



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 01:24 AM
link   
As a complete novice WRT legal proceedings... does the exclusionary rule simply mean that Law Enforcement cannot have done anything illegal to obtain evidence? If it was revealed in the public after a hack, could that not possibly invalidate a request to suppress? (Since the document is now 100% public?)



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 09:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: boncho

Sorry, but the spooky Russians aren't enough to stop this already rolling ball. The thing that you (and the Russians apparently) aren't taking into account is that Clinton is one of the only people Trump can beat. He wouldn't stand a chance against Sanders, wouldn't stand a chance against Jill Stein, there are many alternatives for if Clinton gets knocked out of the race.



Sure. Let me know when you change the world. Please make some more headline-ripped threads on ATS about whatever talking point the PR companies are putting in your mouth.



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 12:28 PM
link   
update!



Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed # Document Text
June 28, 2016 1

1 Class Action Complaint
June 28, 2016 1

1-1 Exhibit 1 to Class Action Complaint
June 28, 2016 1

1-2 Civil Cover Sheet
June 28, 2016 1

1-3 Summonses (DNC Services Corporation)
June 28, 2016 1

1-4 Summonses (Deborah Wasserman Schultz)


source

This is going to get good!



posted on May, 5 2017 @ 12:23 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT


Here is a direct link to the lawsuit.

BTW, notice what a memo from the DNC states on page 22.


...
136.
The DNC Memo presents, “a suggested strategy for positioning and public messaging around the 2016 Republican presidential field.” It states that, “Our goals in the coming months will be to frame the Republican field and the eventual nominee early and to provide a contrast between the GOP field and HRC.
11
” (emphasis added). The DNC Memo also advises that the DNC,(u)se specific hits to muddy the waters around ethics, transparency and campaign finance attacks on HRC.In order tomuddy the watersaround Clintons perceived vulnerabilities, the DNC Memo suggestsseveral different methodsof attack including: (a) (w)orking through the DNCtoutilize reporters and create stories in the mediawith no fingerprints”; (b) “prep(ping)reporters for interviews with GOP candidates and having off-the-record conversations with them; (c) making use of social media attacks; and (d) using the DNC to “insert our messaging” into Republican-favorable press.
...


jampac.us...

In this memo they confirm that they created false stories with no fingerprints... This lawsuit also confirms the fact that the DNC "prepped" reporters that would interview the GOP candidates... This is collusion between the media and th DNC... Alongside framing the Republican nominee...

I wonder if the framing has anything to do with the fact that the DNC didn't want the FBI to have access to their servers, and instead used Crowdstrike to implant false information trying to damage the reputation of the Republican candidate. You know, all the "Trump and his staff has links to the Russians" and all that BS...


edit on 5-5-2017 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.



posted on May, 5 2017 @ 12:30 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Are these actions against the law? We already knew that the DNC was Dirty. They're even worse now, with that Cursing Clown (Tom Perez) running the organization into the ground. But illegal tactics?



posted on May, 5 2017 @ 12:34 AM
link   
"I know there will be PLENTY of Bernie supporters who donated to the DNC who will be joining this suit. "

No, there won;t. They are so anti-Trump they will totally forgive Democrat corruption, as long as they can defeat anything Trump.



posted on May, 5 2017 @ 02:39 AM
link   
I hope something comes of this case. The world needs a wake up call.

The Judges words of " Democracy needs the whole truth so people can make intelligent decisions " is something people need reminding of.

Too many people who profess to be "good citizens" are willing to look the other way while others get done over by corrupt and morally bankrupt Politicians. It is the classic saying of "All it takes for a bad person to succeed, is for a good person to do nothing "

But in this case they were not just doing nothing, they were actually clapping.



posted on May, 5 2017 @ 11:58 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

I am sorry, you want to claim that having the DNC try to frame the political opposition by posting false news stories with "no fingerprints" so we couldn't find who posted those stories, using left-wing reporters by prepping them for when they would interview the opposition, etc, that it is "legal"? Last i checked corruption is illegal, is it not?



posted on May, 20 2017 @ 09:01 AM
link   
This needs a bump. The class action lawsuit is very much current, though it is not being covered in the media.

The DNC are not even arguing the fact they rigged the Primaries and effectively defrauded Bernie Sanders supporters out of their money, they are simply saying that the voters don't matter, and that they can do what they want.


“Shortly into the hearing, DNC attorneys claim Article V, Section 4 of the DNC Charter—stipulating that the DNC chair and their staff must ensure neutrality in the Democratic presidential primaries—is ‘a discretionary rule that it didn’t need to adopt to begin with.’

Based on this assumption, DNC attorneys assert that the court cannot interpret, claim, or rule on anything associated with whether the DNC remains neutral in their presidential primaries.

“The attorneys representing the DNC have previously argued that Sanders supporters knew the primaries were rigged, therefore annulling any potential accountability the DNC may have. In the latest hearing, they doubled down on this argument: ‘The Court would have to find that people who fervently supported Bernie Sanders and who purportedly didn’t know that this favoritism was going on would have not given to Mr. Sanders, to Senator Sanders, if they had known that there was this purported favoritism.’


“Jared Beck, the attorney representing Sanders supporters in the class action lawsuit, retorted that the DNC Charter is not akin to political rhetoric a politician would use during a campaign, but rather an inherent and important part of democracy in America. The entire argument of the DNC in this lawsuit is to conflate the promises of a political candidate with those of an election arbiter bound to neutrality by the DNC Charter, and to claim that fraudulent inducement cannot ever be proven as the DNC attorneys allege, ‘I think there’s an impossible showing of causation.’”


Jared beck spoke with Stefan Molyneux yesterday to update...





edit on 20/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 20 2017 @ 09:20 AM
link   
For those who don't remember, this was the law suit that was served by Sean Lucas last summer and the serving of the suit against Wassermann Schultz and the DNC as whole was live streamed.

The DNC's first motion to dismiss the case, which failed, was that Lucas had not served the papers correctly. They were going after a technicality. Sean Lucas was found dead before he could be reached for his affidavit to push back against the motion to reject the case. Jared Beck covers the timeline of this in the video above.

According to Heavy, the Office of Chief Medical Examiner of Washington D.C. released information to them on 1 November 2016 confirming Lucas’ death as an accidental one caused by the “combined adverse effects of fentanyl [a synthetic opioid pain medication], cyclobenzaprine [a muscle relaxant], and mitragynine [better known as kratom].” If he was murdered by a concoction of drugs then it would indeed be made to look accidental.
edit on 20/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 20 2017 @ 09:28 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

New YOUTUBE on Shawn Lucas death
www.youtube.com...



posted on May, 20 2017 @ 09:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: UKTruth

New YOUTUBE on Shawn Lucas death
www.youtube.com...


Apparently he was found on his bathroom floor with a mix of 3 drugs in his system. The lawyer in the video I posted said that no information has been provided as to why the death was ruled accidental.

Contrary to some reports I read, his girlfriend was not there when he died. He was alone and when she arrived at the house, she found him.

Just as a side point, if the judge rules that this goes to trial, members of the DNC can be forced to testify in a public setting.

Thanks for the video - will watch.
edit on 20/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 20 2017 @ 09:39 AM
link   
Here is the court transcript from the hearing. It is actually a fascinating read and shows just how brazen the DNC is.

jampac.us...




top topics



 
35
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join