It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

The slippery slope of the restroom floor.

page: 5
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in


posted on Jun, 15 2016 @ 05:53 PM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


posted on Jun, 15 2016 @ 06:03 PM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


posted on Jun, 15 2016 @ 06:25 PM
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I mean it seems pretty obvious you're trolling your own thread here, but if you're not aware of this then I'd suggest taking some time away from the keyboard and getting some fresh air.

I could use the same, it's a nice day out.

posted on Jun, 16 2016 @ 12:20 AM

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

And if you think that's how all schools handle it (just let anyone in who says they feel like a girl today), you are as delusional as the OP.

That's what the regulations state. That has been shown. I am not the one in denial here.

posted on Jun, 16 2016 @ 04:32 AM

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Note my links above. The first one is about a girl letting 25 boys have sex with her in a rest room. Rape isn't the only reason to segregate boys and girls.

So.... What you are saying is that unisex/mixed bathrooms will increase promiscuity?

And you are also saying that some boys may pretend to be transgender just to be able to use the female bathrooms? (to obviously get a chance to be alone with a girl).

Is this what you are trying to say?

Your own 'evidence' shows that things already happen in toilets, which means the gender separation doesn't really protect, does it?

posted on Jun, 17 2016 @ 08:57 PM

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: namelesss

Actually read the thread. We're talking about little kids here.

We raise 'little kids' to be ethical, healthy people, right?
We are their examples of how to behave in the world?
Are we 'protecting' them from a healthy open Loving life?
Little kids pee just like grandpa (perhaps not as long... *__- ), use the restroom just like mommy, has no neurosis just like mommy and daddy!

posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 02:41 PM
a reply to: Agartha

The FACTS are that there are already problems with promiscuity AND sexual assaults in school restrooms DESPITE the segregation.

The same as shoplifting still happens in stores despite cameras, alarm tags and so on.

Since shoplifting still occurs, would you actually argue that it makes sense they should just go tear down all the cameras and related loss prevention technologies?

Hardly a spec of difference with the school restrooms (even the same age demographics as the biggest 'group' to do the swiping), except the part we're talking about little kids getting sexually assaulted. If there is anything (besides kids getting murdered) more important than protecting kids from sexual assault, please do let me know.

posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 03:05 PM
What has now occurred to me is maybe this whole big picture is being framed wrong: Instead of it being about what gender they 'think' they are it should be about what their sexual preference is. If say "trans" boys are still attracted to females then who could seriously argue they should go into the little girls room?

Moving on, I think I know how to test if their 'gender identity' is for real, in these regards....

Males have a hardwired tendency to look at girls 'whatever'. The eyes wander, to say the least. This can hardly be helped. BARELY. It isn't something that is a learned gender role, its just REALITY. There has to be plenty of published science about this. What post-adolescent male could argue against this? SO there it is: visual cue testing to see if they still have the hardwired tendency to peek / eyes wander at etc. Likewise, transgender girls, if their brains truly are male'ish, should grow this tendency, which could be tested for. Girls dont have this normally, boys can hardly help it even when they intend to.

I liken it to how the human brain is hardwired to "find the face", that is there's a portion of the brain speific to seeking out & deciphering other human faces. Dogs are entirely incapable of seeing our faces like we can because they dont have this. Likewise, when this portion of the brain is damaged it become incapable of distinguishing faces.

The condition is known as “prosopagnosia” / “facial agnosia”, or in less medical terms: “face blindness”. (“Prosopagnosia” actually literally means: “face ignorance”. “prosopon” = “face”, “agnosia” = “not knowing” or “ignorance”).

Once thought to be incredibly rare, with only 100 or so documented cases up until the last decade or so, it’s now thought that around 1 in every 50 people suffers from this condition; though for most, they just have a really hard time recognizing people by their faces. For instance, in one study, a person with this condition was shown a picture of Elvis Presley and thought it was Brooke Shields.

Armed with this insight, forever now when crossing roads I look right at the drivers to ensure they see me even if 'not looking' because I believe the brain cant help but 'find the face'.

Anyways, a quick GoogleFU for some relevant data about the sexual component only gave me this bit that I could copy-paste (there was some stuff in some Google Books):

A man's physical response to porn—faster heart rate, increased bloodflow, erection—is preceded by a deeper neurological process, which scientists have attempted to capture through brain scans. The results have varied widely. "There are so many moving parts in this equation," says William Struthers, Ph.D., a biopsychologist and the author of Wired for Intimacy. "How old is the man? Is he involved in a sexual relationship? Is he regularly masturbating? People think sex is always the same. It's not. You look at food very differently when you're hungry compared with when you've just finished a meal."

Even so, a few broad themes have consistently emerged. First is the cognitive component—visual processing, attention, and reward. "Pornographic images seem to activate a man's visual system in a manner that goes beyond just looking at trees or even people," says Struthers. "It's almost like a high-definition signal compared with a standard signal." Once this signal—Tori Black in the nude, say—hits the male antenna, the mesolimbic (reward) system kicks in, producing a rush of feel-good dopamine.

This can reinforce the behavior much in the same way that drugs like coc aine would—which is perhaps the most widely exploited argument against porn. "Guys freak out when they think porn might be 'rewiring' their brains," says Struthers. "The reality is, our brains are regularly being 'rewired'—we wouldn't learn anything otherwise." Perhaps more troublesome is what occurs after that pleasurable surge: the activation of brain regions tied to motivation, which drives men to seek sexual release.

edit on 23-6-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-6-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 4 2016 @ 11:02 PM
More over:

These videos perfectly illustrates the nature of men to look at girls.

Therefore, if "transgender" males are heterosexual, then they probably shouldn't be in the girls room.

Looking at these sorts, what's interesting is how in Mumbai we dont get the same extremist rubbernecking behavior:

edit on 4-7-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 10:07 PM
double post
edit on 5-7-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics

<< 2  3  4   >>

log in