a reply to: hounddoghowlie
NO it has NOT been shown to be a natural phenomenon, it has however had the old it is a stone argument used against it by the same crowd as usual
whom fall back on that when all else fail's though this time they had to get a little more clever about it and even then the posited explanation
simply does not cut it, it is essentially a theoretical observation on how nature COULD have created it the same as the idea of a room full of chimp's
and typewriter's if given long enough randomly hitting the key's producing the collected work's of shakespear, in other word's it is a stupid
explanation which tried to explain an artificial allignment and obvious construction as natural erosion caused by underwater current's (what? how many
current's flowing in how many direction's?) and other complex action's.
The same argument was used the other day to deny that geometrically and evenly spaced tall pyramid structures in the Amazon are natural claiming they
are sand stone formation's and that too was patently wrong, in fact I shall go one over on that and posit something you WILL find ridiculous about
Well over a decade ago back when we had early Sky analogue satellite we in england were able to recieve several german satallite TV station's and one
of them used to stream feed's of the earth taken from space, I used to record them on my old VHS video recorder and one such feed showed these same
structures, there position in relation to the Andes as seen from space in that sea of green and also in relation to those structures there was a bow
shaped mark in the jungle, if it was what it looked like which was the image of what appeared to be a gigantic damn far larger than any we have built
(though it could also have been the edge of a crater) and if it was and our building method's of using the arch of a damn to hold back water apply
then it was obviously constructed to stop water flowing TOWARD the west of south america TOWARD the Andes but whatever that mark (discolouration of
the forest) was it was EAST of those structures and very large but totally overgrown by the jungle and probably buried under the ground as well,
whatever body of water it once damned if it was a damn must have been silted up and overgrown.
So since I had seen that and I have a passing interest in Geological process I considered long before I became a member of ATS, indeed long before
the internet was the wide spread thing that it is today what could have TILTED the south american continent and reversed the angle of it from west to
east, Mid Atlantic ridge instability, Ice pressure on the northern hemisphere causing subcrustal magma displacement toward the equator of the plant
and upward thrusting it like a ball with a little more air in it followed by rapid ice melting causing a pressure void near the east coast of south
and north america, west coast of europe and africa as the magma was able to flow back northward and the increase of ocean weight as the water form the
glaciation melt poured back into the ocean, the east coast of the south american plate sliding over a proto continent or extremely thickened and
ancient area of pacific plate.
The mechanic's are simple, the continent of south america dipped to the east and rose to the west cataclysmically sometime within the past 15000
years or so, a dual tidal wave of unimaginable size raced across both the atantic and the pacific, the Altiplana with the strange land locked harbour
of Puma Punku and the city of Tiwanaku was thrust upward it's fjord like bay becoming trapped at high altitude and forming lake titicaca, west of the
coastal mountain range we know as the ande's sea bed was lifted upward forming the west coast of south american with it's desert's and it's odd
geology, the east coast meanwhile along with this city off cuba was plunged into the depth's by an equal altitude and land became sea bed.
Simple, horrifying, linked to a huge flood and why civilization was wiped off the face of the earth and you can't find it, it was simply all washed
away or it remain's are now mostly under the water, except for a few ruin's that many here claim to be far younger than they are such as Tiwanaku and
Puma Punku, of course they were used as ceremonial sites long after the cataclysm but maybe not by the same people's, were people had lived became
uninhabitable, those that survived and were farmer's probably starved and the formerly barren arctic land's of europe and north america slowly
recovered so that one day there descendant's would rise again with no knowledge of what had come before?.
(the alternative is that the Continent tilted over 65 million years ago but that is too old for what I observed in My opinion so I believe it was far
more recent and this belief was strengthened by this discovery off cuba, how does a city sink that far in that time, a mixture of continental tilting,
rapid or slow both work, natural sinking of the land surface due to magma pressure dropping below the crust and rising sea level's pushing down on the
now sunken land as well as the ocean bed further way which also pull's it downward)
Of course those that deny this also deny this,
And then when you go back to this other thread and listen to the faulty reasoning behind why people say they are natural and have a think about it,
well there is a vested interest in NOT seeing ruin's that can not be explained, it is the see no evil atitude like the blind monkey of the chinese
proverb, if it does not fit there world view it does not exist, the problem is that it DOES exist.
edit on 20-5-2016 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)