It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
He was granted immunity to speak freely without incriminating himself. That does not indicate anything other than that simple fact.
Unless you know what info he had to spill to the FBI.
Do you have that info?
Three cybersecurity experts said they found Lazar's explanation for accessing the Clinton server plausible but had questions.
Cybersecurity expert Morgan Wright explained how the FBI could marry up available evidence, including forensics or the configuration of the server and its folders, to assess his claims. "So we're going to map these things together, and if those things match up together, they're going to say ‘yes, this was compromised,’ then it means it was open to other people to compromise as well," he said.
Since Fox News reported on Guccifer’s claims Wednesday, anonymous sources have reported that a review of the Clinton hard drives does not appear to indicate a breach. However, Wright and other experts warned that Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano was the server's administrator and not principally a cybersecurity specialist – and may not have installed an adequate detection system for a Cabinet secretary’s email.
“If you have a bank and you have one video camera when you need 20, then you missed it,” Wright said. “If they weren't capturing all the activity, their security logs may say they didn’t see anything."
The official said the FBI had secured the cooperation of Bryan Pagliano, who worked on Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009.
As the FBI looks to wrap up its investigation in the coming months, agents are likely to want to interview Clinton and her senior aides about the decision to use a private server, how it was set up, and whether any of the participants knew they were sending classified information in emails, current and former officials said.
The very heart of FBI operations lies in our investigations—which serve, as our mission states, “to protect and defend the United States against terrorist and foreign intelligence threats and to enforce the criminal laws of the United States.” We currently have jurisdiction over violations of more than 200 categories of federal law, and you can find the major ones below, grouped within our national security and criminal priorities. Also visit our Intelligence program site, which underpins and informs all our investigative programs.
Downplay that all you want, but it raises serious questions about her
anyone who supports her.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burntheships
Poor choice is not in this case criminal.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
It's not a belief. I need facts to come to any conclusion.
It is you that believes Pagliano was given immunity for the reasons you desire.
You better pray a bit harder for it to come true, because you invested a lot in a situation you know very little about.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
It's not a belief. I need facts to come to any conclusion.
It is you that believes Pagliano was given immunity for the reasons you desire.
You better pray a bit harder for it to come true, because you invested a lot in a situation you know very little about.
Except it certainly appears the only "facts" you believe in are those that have been fabricated to support your pro liberal views. And this is glaringly obvious.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
It's not a belief. I need facts to come to any conclusion.
It is you that believes Pagliano was given immunity for the reasons you desire.
You better pray a bit harder for it to come true, because you invested a lot in a situation you know very little about.
Except it certainly appears the only "facts" you believe in are those that have been fabricated to support your pro liberal views. And this is glaringly obvious.
I am not a liberal, first and foremost. Second, what facts have I used in this debate can you prove to be fabricated?
You claim to not be a Liberal. And I believe you have also claimed to not be a Clinton supporter, yet here you are. In another Clinton thread. Supporting her.
If you held Trump to the same standards as Clinton, you might just see how wrong you've been.
Am I right when I say you're not a Clinton supporter or is that not true, and you do in fact support Clinton?
A likely story.
If you support Hillary, and you do, then you support her liberal views by proxy.
And your correct about not using any facts, only blanket excuses for all that Hillary has done. Give it a rest.
originally posted by: rollanotherone
a reply to: introvert
So, you're not voting, but criticizing anyone that does. Got it.
originally posted by: rollanotherone
a reply to: introvert
You've been pretty harsh on Trump and his supporters. Have you not?
originally posted by: RickinVa
The Hillerites are getting very nervous.... more and more details leak out,,,, aides have been on the grill, in some cases, multiple times...the big kahuna is about to go on the grill.
What a great summer this is shaping up to be!!
I wonder who it was that was taking stuff of the top secret network and emailing it to Hillarys unclassified home server?
questions questions questions
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: RickinVa
The Hillerites are getting very nervous.... more and more details leak out,,,, aides have been on the grill, in some cases, multiple times...the big kahuna is about to go on the grill.
What a great summer this is shaping up to be!!
I wonder who it was that was taking stuff of the top secret network and emailing it to Hillarys unclassified home server?
questions questions questions
Whatever you have to tell yourself Rick. You have a lot more invested in this than anyone else.
If she is indicted, so be it. Justice should be done.
If she is not, guess who's ass is on the grill?
Fire-up the Q Ricky. Either way, brisket's a burnin'.