It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
Ignore the report that the FBI has found no wrong doing. I'm gonna bet the FBI knows those laws.
No skin off my nose.
The State Department said today it can’t find any of Bryan Pagliano’s emails from the time he served as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s senior information technology staffer during her tenure there.
all emphasis mine
Case 1:15-cv-02117-RDM Document 12 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 12
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
JASON LEOPOLD,
Case No. 15-cv-02117 RDM
...
In fact, the review of in
camera submissions can be particularly appropriate in Exemption 7(A) cases. To
demonstrate that information is properly withheld under that Exemption, the agency must
show that disclosure could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement
proceedings. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A). Often the agency cannot fully articulate the harm
that could reasonably be expected to result if the information is disclosed without
revealing the very information regarding the investigation that the agency seeks to
protect. See Campbell, 682 F.2d at 265 (in Exemption 7(A) cases, “the interests of the
adversary process may be outweighed by the agency’s legitimate interest in secrecy”)
...
The remainder of the cases relied on by Plaintiff did not involve FOIA requests,
and most were between private parties (and thus could not have implicated classified or
law enforcement sensitive information). Given the unique nature of FOIA cases and
explicit allowance of in camera submissions in the FOIA itself, Arieff, 712 F.2d at 1469,
Plaintiff’s reliance on non-FOIA cases as a basis for questioning Defendant’s submission
of a classified, in camera declaration is inapposite.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: SonOfThor
So what. I showed they're done and she's free to go. Or soon will be anyway.
I could not care less what Rick showed. Ricks been swelling the thread with imagination.
My argument doesn't need help. Sorry you don't like it. I'm not here to please you.
Hillary's going to the white house. Not the big house. That was always just a republican fairy tale.