It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered."
Originally posted by jprophet420
yeah, i agree. they better not go teaching my kid the theory of relativity untill we actually travel at the speed of light and prove it. Imagine how much more advanced science would be today if it wasnt oppressed through the ages in a similar fashion.
Originally posted by PistolPete
Even without saying a word about creationism or religion. I bet one mother got indignant over this and she's the singular reason why it changed.
Originally posted by PistolPete
How is that an endorsement of religion? Evolution is a theory! That's why it's called the Theory of Evolution. It's ridiculous that a school can't say that not everyone holds that this theory is a fact. Even without saying a word about creationism or religion. I bet one mother got indignant over this and she's the singular reason why it changed.
Originally posted by TheWrAiTH
If evolution isn't a theory, then prove it!
www.johntaylorgatto.com
What evolution has to do with the macropolitics of schooling becomes clear if you consider that both are concerned with what should be encouraged to thrive, and what should be helped to perish. Evolutionary theory made all the difference in how systematic schooling was internally arranged. Too much effort wasn’t wasted on hopeless trash, and the good stock was separated from the common. With justification.
Global entrepreneurs such as John D. Rockefeller Sr. and Andrew Carnegie found natural selection to be a perfect explanation for their laissez-faire economic principles. To Rockefeller, for instance, "the growth of large business is merely survival of the fittest"; savage business practices aren’t evil, "merely the working out of a law of nature and a law of God." According to Herbert Spencer, nothing escaped evolution’s power: "every single organism" or institution evolved, religions evolved, economies evolved; evolution exposed democratic theory for the childish fantasy it really was.
Its pretty obvious that that was the intent by the enlightened members of the schoold boards had Creation Science in mind. Eveolution can be backed up and proven time and time again.
Originally posted by PistolPete
"This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered."
How is that an endorsement of religion?
Because they alternative that the religious present are religious alternatives. The sticker is something put there by fundamentalists because evolution is at odds with their fundamentalism.
I bet one mother got indignant over this and she's the singular reason why it changed.
More like a minority of people were offended by evolution, so they have moved to denigrate it. The occurance of evolution is a fact. There are also theories about various aspects and mechanisms of evolution. The fact that very few people understand this indicates that science education in the country is poor, and certainly that stickers like this are adding to the problem.
it's the fact that they shouldn't strike all dissenting opinions about it out of the equation.
What scientific alternative should be included in science classes then?
John Taylor Gatto, the New York City teacher of the year several times and highly respected speaker and author in the field of education essentially believes that Darwin, who was an elite, created the the Theory of Evolution as justification to keep the lower classes down.
How embarassing for the NYC educational system.
But everyone ignores when that happens.
When?
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Actually if you were able to travel at the speed of light, that would disprove the theory of relativity. While I think it's not really a seperation of church/state issue I think the argument that a myriad of stickers demanded by different groups might start showing up on all textbooks may be valid, it's best to just understand this is science and science was never meant to prove or disprove religion.
Originally posted by jprophet420
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Actually if you were able to travel at the speed of light, that would disprove the theory of relativity. While I think it's not really a seperation of church/state issue I think the argument that a myriad of stickers demanded by different groups might start showing up on all textbooks may be valid, it's best to just understand this is science and science was never meant to prove or disprove religion.
could you please explain that one to me? thank you. especially since tachyons travel faster than the speed of light.