It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Forty fully armed men came to his job site that day dressed as construction workers who never identified themselves as FBI, even while they were beating him.
For almost two full days Mel Bundy was forced to sit in a room with no bathroom, covered in his own urine, feces, and vomit.
During that time Mel Bundy was offered a slice of stale bread to sustain him. When they finally did bring him a meal on the third day, he was forced to eat it on the floor “like a dog” according to his wife.
LaVoy Finicum’s daughter Thara Tenney shocks the conscience with how the Patriots of Malheur are being treated in Oregon and Nevada jails. Just a few days ago, Ryan Bundy was sent back to solitary confinement. His crime? He was freezing and put on an extra shirt. That was against the “rules.”
No Patriot of Malheur EVER brandished or pointed or even threatened with a gun. Agent provocateurs and other imposters may have, but THESE men and women did not.
So why is the torture of solitary confinement being inflicted on them, when no Court has found them guilty or convicted them of any crime? [snip]
The reason for torture is to break down the prisoner’s will and to coerce them to agree to a plea bargain for a lesser charge.
Hansen referred to Bundy as a "political prisoner." Though the judge that decided to keep him in jail back in February after his arrest in Oregon declared that he was both "lawless and violent," no evidence has been presented to substantiate those claims.
He also argued that no one from Bundy's side ever fired a weapon or assaulted a federal officer and that the only acts of violence in Bunkerville were committed by federal agents. "The government has seemingly put together a strong case against Mr. Bundy, but when it is seen for what it really is, it is a collection of unsupported allegations, inconceivable innuendos, bald assertions and unproven allegations," Hansen wrote.
However, the claims of the government being scared to actually go to court against Cliven Bundy have their roots in a April 2014 Bureau of Land Management claim that they are worried that Bundy may just have prescriptive rights and that his defense may just use that should his case see the inside of a courtroom.
This is important to note. The only shots that actually occurred came from the Oregon State Police and the FBI in the cold-blooded murder of LaVoy Finicum. Not one protester fired their weapons. Even at Bundy Ranch, it was only federal agents that tasered law-abiding citizens, killed cattle and infringed on their right to peacefully protest and address their government for grievances.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Boadicea
The gov't is known for it's terrible acts but this is so outrageous I gotta wonder how much of it, if any, is true.
originally posted by: gladtobehere
a reply to: Boadicea
Should we really be surprised?
We Americans LOVE violence.
We love violence by our government, both foreign and domestic.
And we love it against each other.
But GUNS are the problem, mm hmm, sure.
Just look at this thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
First they came for the blacks, but you stood aside because you are not black.
Then they came for the muslims, but you stood aside because you are not a muslim.
originally posted by: eisegesis
Good thread Miss(?) Boadicea. S+F
Whether or not you agree with the Bundy's stance, this type of treatment does little to represent the opposition. Its almost like they're trying to make an example out of the bunch considering this information has found it's way here.
originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
a reply to: Boadicea
First they came for the blacks, but you stood aside because you are not black.
Then they came for the muslims, but you stood aside because you are not a muslim.
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
First they came for the blacks, but you stood aside because you are not black.
Then they came for the muslims, but you stood aside because you are not a muslim.
That's right.
NOBODY should be treated like this. But you can't just complain about it when it's someone you like. When you accept this kind of treatment of others because they are Black, or Gay, or Muslim, or Atheist, or (name your personal enemy) then you're also compliant when it's done to someone who you also support.
originally posted by: Boadicea
What the hell have we allowed ourselves to become???
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Boadicea
Well, it's way to early and difficult to prove it's untrue.
It's so outrageous I dunno if I can buy it without actual evidence.
If any of it is true than those authorities must know they'll have consequences to look forward to because I seriously doubt the Bundy's wouldn't at least try to sue.
Alarming for sure.
And we also need to focus on the articles in the OP that are about the Chicago Homan Square facility.