It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sep
Its a good story. Not very realistic, but a good story none the less.
Originally posted by RedPhoenixDelta
1. Pakistan's current leader is friendly with our current U.S. administration, even though his people may not like it. India won't invade china.
2. The World would never approve sanctions on china, even if china invaded parts of Khasmir, because the world loves China, Russia, France, Germany, Syria, Iran and the Iraq under Saddam Hussein.
3. Nobody's intelligence is skilled enough to pull off a successful location of all nuclear sites to initiate a pre-emptive strike. Maybe if we had the cloaking device from Battlestar Galactica.....
1. I never said India will invade China. I expect India to invade Pakistan eventually.
Originally posted by RedPhoenixDelta
1. I never said India will invade China. I expect India to invade Pakistan eventually.
Yeah, I meant India won't invade Pakistan.
Thanks for updating, all all confused me with the sanction part.
China won't impose sanctions because without their exports added to their population problems, they would crumble.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
If I may press you, what about it do you feel is unlikely to happen. It seems to me that the economic and strategic interests are there and therefore the temptation to take action is as well.
It may seem alarmist, but historically there is a precedent for the development of new economies to lead to complex politics and wars. Look at the colonization of the New World.
Originally posted by Sep
First, "America provokes Iran into a war and occupies Iran." Thats going to be very hard. I dont want to complicate the thread but invading and staying and exploiting Irans natural reasources are going to be very difficult and costly. The world is not going to accept an invasion of Iran lightly. Russia, China, Europe all have intrests in Iran that they dont want destroyed.
Second, "America continues to develop Caspian Sea gas resources from Iran, Turkmeinistan, and Azerbaijan, shipping them through Afghanistan to Pakistan and out to India. "
Russia is not going to take this lightly. I dont think any gas has been taken out of the caspian because of territorial arguments and Russia isnt going to back down easily.
Third, "America supports terrorism in Kashmir and secretly blames Pakistani Intelligence in reports to India and encourages them to undertake a war on Pakistan. American intelligence and arms deals provide India with the means to preemptively destroy all pakistani nuclear weapons."
It is not going to be easy locating all of the nukes in Pakistan. And they can not be taken out quickly enough. If it was that easy, America itself would have taken out the nukes.
Fourth, "India conquers Pakistan in a quick bloody war made possible by American intelligence help to facilitate first strikes and Pakistan's dependence on its now destroyed deterrent. "
Again, not that easy. Pakistan cannot be controlled after being conqured. Too many tribesmen, guns, terrorist around. Controlling Pakistan would be close to impossible.
Fifth, "America and Britain laughably target China with the same arguements they ignored when going into Iraq, but the threat of war with America keeps China from unilaterally attacking India. China imposes heavy sanctions on all nations involved- this is the escalation of a very intense cold war between America and China."
The US cannot fight a war with China. Both sides are too strong, so a war will be imposible. And if China puts sanctions on the US, both sides will go down. This will be stupid from both sides point of view, and I simply cannot see it happening. And remember the US has invaded Iran and is trying to control it. Do you think the US has enough money to finance a war with Iran and China and support India? I dont and the Chinese will know this so a threat of war will obviously be an empty one and will not stop them from going to war.
This is my opinion, sorry if it is an ignorant opinion, I dont have much knowledge when it comes to economies, militaries, etc...
Originally posted by DYepes
You know NATO is in charge of Afghanistan.
Wars cost more than peace, it isnt economically sound.
You must be ignorant to believe any Muslim nation, even Pakistan would trust the U.S. and just pretend they are never plotting anything against them.
As far as your war scenarios go, you make it seem like the countries that need to be occupied in question will just not see it coming and fall quickly. India launchign a First strike on their nuke facilites? You serious? Pakistan would have their nukes in the air in minutes when they realize this blasphemy against humanity by India.
Why don't the general population stop thinking about wars for non-renewable resources and concentrate our thinking power on alternative solutions so that we wouldn't even have to think about scenarios like these?