It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Outraged When Asked About Contributions From Fossil Fuel Industry

page: 3
53
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 12:58 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth



Hitler used to get very angry when giving speeches, pointing very much like Hillary was here. It's very dangerous to elect Hillary because this evidence points clearly to the fact she may put millions in camps.

Dangerous times.


You are being facetious, right?

Angry speeches and pointing = Hitler and millions in camps?

Surely you can't expect us to believe something as ridiculous as that?




posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 01:05 PM
link   
Now check out the top 5 that have received money from Lawyers and Lobbyists:
www.opensecrets.org...

How many of those are "fossil fuel" lobbyists? Who knows?

Presidential Candidates

Amount
1 Clinton, Hillary (D) $13,927,586
2 Bush, Jeb (R) $2,271,969
3 Rubio, Marco (R) $1,947,178
4 Cruz, Ted (R) $1,116,098
5 Sanders, Bernie (D) $1,024,242



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 01:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Rocker2013

Click on the YouTube page, go to the description and there you will find links.



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 01:22 PM
link   
Sanders campaign!

I thought it was a 'vast right wing conspiracy' spreading 'lies' !



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 01:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth



Hitler used to get very angry when giving speeches, pointing very much like Hillary was here. It's very dangerous to elect Hillary because this evidence points clearly to the fact she may put millions in camps.

Dangerous times.


You are being facetious, right?

Angry speeches and pointing = Hitler and millions in camps?

Surely you can't expect us to believe something as ridiculous as that?


Yes it was in jest.

I know you, as someone who appears to be quite intelligent, understands the subtext of that jest.
edit on 1/4/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth



Hitler used to get very angry when giving speeches, pointing very much like Hillary was here. It's very dangerous to elect Hillary because this evidence points clearly to the fact she may put millions in camps.

Dangerous times.


You are being facetious, right?

Angry speeches and pointing = Hitler and millions in camps?

Surely you can't expect us to believe something as ridiculous as that?


Yes it was in jest.

I know you, as someone who appears to be quite intelligent, understands the subtext of that jest.


Yes, I understand what you did there.

Just had to make sure you were not being serious. Stranger things have happened.



posted on Apr, 1 2016 @ 07:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills




Ladies and Gentlemen, the REAL Hillary Clinton.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:30 AM
link   
Oh look. Another Hillary thread. Guess it's necessary to take the focus off the Orange clown who wants to punish women for having abortions and nuke Europe.

I get it. You need the diversion so you don't have to think about that misogynistic lunatic you have for a candidate.
I warned you.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


Oh look Hillary did something unfavorable to her campaign.

TRUMP!!! TRUMP!!! TRUMP!!!


Doesn't that every get old?

Perhaps you could posit a counter argument that Hillary doesn't accept money from "big oil", or that her donations of millions per contribution is the same as Sanders contributions of tens per, or hell even "sniper fire".


What does Trump have to do with Hillary being in the pocket of Big Oil have to do with this thread, other than to admit that you want to distract away from your dirty candidate?



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Oh look. Another Hillary thread. Guess it's necessary to take the focus off the Orange clown who wants to punish women for having abortions and nuke Europe.

I get it. You need the diversion so you don't have to think about that misogynistic lunatic you have for a candidate.
I warned you.



Oh look. Another Hillary shill. Guess it's necessary to put focus back on that lying witch who wants to punish women for not voting for her by having a supporter condemn those women to everlasting damnation by telling them there is a special place in hell.

I get it. You need the diversion so you don't have to face the fact the Sanders is more popular because of her all her unfavorables and her undemocratic lead because of superdelegates.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 11:05 AM
link   
That's what you get if you are a fossil and think like a fossil, sorry couldn't help it..



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 01:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

She will get votes simply because of the stupidity of voters.

Like I said in another thread, a random person on the street asked by a news reporter who he was voting for and why, said "Hillary Clinton- I want to see how a woman would handle it."

That's about the pettiest reason I could ever think of to VOTE FOR THE PRESIDENT.

It blows my mind and yet does not surprise me.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 03:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Schmoe1223
a reply to: Swills

She will get votes simply because of the stupidity of voters.

Like I said in another thread, a random person on the street asked by a news reporter who he was voting for and why, said "Hillary Clinton- I want to see how a woman would handle it."

That's about the pettiest reason I could ever think of to VOTE FOR THE PRESIDENT.

It blows my mind and yet does not surprise me.


It reminds me of the Trump protester asked yesterday why he was protesting...

Reporter : 'Why are you protesting against Trump'
Protester : 'I don't like his policies'
Reporter : 'Which policies?'
Protester : 'all of them'
Reporter : 'Can you give me a couple of examples?'
Protester : 'I don't really know'

I think people are voting on emotion and cultural beliefs this time round.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 06:31 PM
link   
In case people forgot who hillary is,

this vid sums her up somewhat.

Big oil money is nothing to her really and not something to be worried about.

I forgot a few of these myself.




posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:13 PM
link   
a reply to: JaMeDoIt

It's like choosing between herpes or syphilus..she is a snake of the most vile kind and Trump a straight up buffoon..only thing missing is his clown shoes.



posted on Apr, 2 2016 @ 10:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
Now check out the top 5 that have received money from Lawyers and Lobbyists:
www.opensecrets.org...

How many of those are "fossil fuel" lobbyists? Who knows?

Presidential Candidates

Amount
1 Clinton, Hillary (D) $13,927,586
2 Bush, Jeb (R) $2,271,969
3 Rubio, Marco (R) $1,947,178
4 Cruz, Ted (R) $1,116,098
5 Sanders, Bernie (D) $1,024,242


I don't see Trump on that list!

I guess they don't like him.

I feel bad for him, I give my vote.



posted on Apr, 3 2016 @ 10:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: queenofswords
Now check out the top 5 that have received money from Lawyers and Lobbyists:
www.opensecrets.org...

How many of those are "fossil fuel" lobbyists? Who knows?

Presidential Candidates

Amount
1 Clinton, Hillary (D) $13,927,586
2 Bush, Jeb (R) $2,271,969
3 Rubio, Marco (R) $1,947,178
4 Cruz, Ted (R) $1,116,098
5 Sanders, Bernie (D) $1,024,242


I don't see Trump on that list!

I guess they don't like him.

I feel bad for him, I give my vote.


So Trump has managed to declare that he isn't taking money from lobbyists or industry by a pretty clever work around. He takes money in as loans to his business entities and then takes loans from those entities for his campaign.



The vast majority of Trump’s contributions to his own campaign — about $12.6 million — are loans rather than donations. This means he could expect to eventually recoup these funds.

Further, of the approximately $12 million Trump’s campaign spent in 2015, about $2.7 million went toward reimbursing Trump-affiliated companies for services provided to the campaign, such as traveling in his own plane and helicopter, according to a New York Times analysis.

www.politifact.com...

So in order to figure out who is investing in Trump...you would have to trace who is investing in his entities he is taking loans from. He actually figured out a completely Dark way of taking big money.



posted on Apr, 3 2016 @ 10:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
Now check out the top 5 that have received money from Lawyers and Lobbyists:
www.opensecrets.org...

How many of those are "fossil fuel" lobbyists? Who knows?

Presidential Candidates

Amount
1 Clinton, Hillary (D) $13,927,586
2 Bush, Jeb (R) $2,271,969
3 Rubio, Marco (R) $1,947,178
4 Cruz, Ted (R) $1,116,098
5 Sanders, Bernie (D) $1,024,242


Maybe look at the energy sector? Or did those numbers not appeal to your argument?



posted on Apr, 3 2016 @ 01:23 PM
link   
HRC is a sell out, a bought and paid for corporate politician, we don't need her!


“Fifty-eight lobbyists that work for the coal, oil and gas companies have given $138,400 directly to the Clinton campaign,” the document reads. “Forty-seven of those lobbyists gave the maximum allowable amount — $2,700.”

“Eleven oil and gas industry lobbyists also bundled $1,327,210 for Clinton’s campaign as of the end of 2015,” Greenpeace continues. Because there is a legal cap on donations from an individual, lobbyists often employ their family members to maximize household donations. The fact is this: lobbyists equal influence.


source



posted on Apr, 3 2016 @ 01:41 PM
link   
The system should be changed.

Anyone seeking political power ought to be disqualified from office, and assumed to be corrupt. Instead select our politicians like we select our Jurors.

Everyone, without a criminal record for serious crimes, fitting a criteria can be randomly called up to political service, and must devote a period of time, such as two years, to the job.

Virtually no mainstream politicians had previous political experience, before they enetered poilitics...yet quite a few end up running nations. (or ruining them)


edit on 3 4 2016 by MysterX because: typo




top topics



 
53
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join