It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: wisvol
a reply to: Prezbo369
I've been compensated for expressing my thoughts in universities, yes.
As have other creationists.
No, actually as a sane man I'd change my beliefs if they were contradicted by scientific discoveries.
However, theories claiming to contradict them do abound, as has been the case since my beliefs were first formed millenia ago.
originally posted by: wisvol
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Using words correctly is a prerequisite of efficient conversation.
Faith does not mean "gullibility", in fact it means faith.
I do find the faith in the origin of species being other species to be gullibility also, yet that's an opinion.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: wisvol
a reply to: Prezbo369
I've been compensated for expressing my thoughts in universities, yes.
As have other creationists.
There you go again, answering questions nobody asked you because you have nothing else to say....
You're a Creationist 'scientist' aren't you? Whatever it is you do should surely produce something we can examine in the lab and reproduce and verify....no?
You're a Creationist 'scientist' aren't you? Whatever it is you do should surely produce something we can examine in the lab and reproduce and verify....no?
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: wisvol
a reply to: TzarChasm
The big explosion has been verified. Its not a matter of opinion anymore.
Thanks for your statement of faith, which is an opinion.
Le sigh...
Faith is believing things for no good reason, faith is for the gullible even in the face of evidence and reason to the contrary.
Faith is all you and other Creationist types have, you have no good reason to hold the irrational beliefs you hold, you cannot bring anything whatsoever to the table to demonstrate your beliefs to be accurate, you just know what you want to be true (Magic).
This is evident by the complete lack of substance you have brought to these boards, just like every other vapid creatonist.
originally posted by: wisvol
a reply to: Prezbo369
You asked whether I am a scientist, which I am.
I have only worked for secular universities so far.
Not a scientist of any merit at least.
You cannot possibly be a scientist if you genuinely believe in creationism and that the earth is only a few thousand years old.
originally posted by: wisvol
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Great opinion there, just an addition:
comparing a scientist to a priest really shows how you view science, when science is actually something else entirely.
Dictionaries do help with this: science
I didn't compare being a scientist to a priest. You missed my point entirely.
You cannot possibly be a scientist if you genuinely believe in creationism and that the earth is only a few thousand years old. You just cant. Not a scientist of any merit at least. Thats like me becoming a priest even though im an atheist.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: namelesss
I use the definition in my preserved word of God for my understanding of faith and belief.
Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
Perhaps someday you'll experience unconditional Love, and then you'll 'Know'! *__-
But 'believe' are ego, vanity, and that's what they do.