It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
University of Calgary study shows rise in decay worst in baby teeth
The study, published Wednesday in the journal Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, compared Grade 2 students in Calgary and Edmonton, which still adds fluoride to its drinking water.
"This is a relatively new finding, so we are going to take a look at the report and go from there with an evidence-based decision," she said. Denise Kokaram, of the Alex Dental Health Bus, says water fluoridation is the cheapest, most economical way to protect dental health in children — especially for families who can't afford dental care.
Jim Stevenson also voted to remove fluoride from Calgary's water, saying there was insufficient medical proof that keeping it would have any benefit.
Carra said at the time of the 2011 vote, council faced a cost of about $10 million to upgrade the city's fluoride injection system, plus an ongoing maintenance cost of $1 million annually.
"The conversation we were having with the province was that fluoridation is a public health issue
originally posted by: raedar
Fluoride is good for teeth when applied topically, not by ingesting.
originally posted by: dogstar23
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
I know my small sample size isn't meaningful from a scientific perspective, but my family's teeth are all exceedingly strong, with no problems. Neither my wife nor I have had any issues in the past 10 years of zero flouride use, and neither of our children (close to 2 & 4 years old) have any issues. We use reverse osmosis water, and flouride-free toothpaste.
I do believe that flouride has some use in preventing tooth decay, but it's not the only way, and ingestion of flouride is, well, stupid, unscientific, and ridiculous. I'm not against the use of flouride toothpaste in kids who are old enough to know not to swallow any of it, but it really isn't necessary, or the best method to prevent tooth decay. It is an enzyme disruptor (that's more or less how it works to prevent tooth decay), and also what makes it a poison.
originally posted by: gmoneystunt
a reply to: raedar
originally posted by: raedar
Fluoride is good for teeth when applied topically, not by ingesting.
I don't think so. That's why they voted to remove fluoride from Calgary's water, saying there was insufficient medical proof that keeping it would have any benefit. Who ever told you fluoride is good for your teeth if its topically applied is a liar. Its just a way to disperse a toxin and make a profit instead of forking up money to properly dispose of it.
Fluoride is a mineral that occurs naturally in many foods and water. Every day, minerals are added to and lost from a tooth's enamel layer through two processes, demineralization and remineralization. Minerals are lost (demineralization) from a tooth's enamel layer when acids -- formed from plaque bacteria and sugars in the mouth -- attack the enamel. Minerals such as fluoride, calcium, and phosphate are redeposited (remineralization) to the enamel layer from the foods and waters consumed. Too much demineralization without enough remineralization to repair the enamel layer leads to tooth decay.