It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bearack
originally posted by: pexx421
I don't really understand most of you here. Sanders claims to want to take money out of politics. To break up too big to fail institutions. To use our taxes to support the majority rather than the wealthy elite. What do his opponents want? To wage more war. To continue to cater to the powerful corporations at your expense. To create a Christian theocracy. And this is OK how?
The thing that is not understood, however, is his policy will force all (even the poor) to take a substantial tax burden hit. Not only through our income, but through your wallet as well.
How can people have the right to accumulate a resource by making it more scarce to all others?
The native Americans had it right....resources should equally be shared by all who live in the area.
I would fully support expropriatary taxes on high income brackets.
They don't let citizens own bombs, tanks, or missiles. Why?
Excessive wealth accumulation is equally dangerous.
The native Americans had it right....resources should equally be shared by all who live in the area.
income taxes, capital gains, property taxes etc
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Bearack
originally posted by: pexx421
I don't really understand most of you here. Sanders claims to want to take money out of politics. To break up too big to fail institutions. To use our taxes to support the majority rather than the wealthy elite. What do his opponents want? To wage more war. To continue to cater to the powerful corporations at your expense. To create a Christian theocracy. And this is OK how?
The thing that is not understood, however, is his policy will force all (even the poor) to take a substantial tax burden hit. Not only through our income, but through your wallet as well.
Yes, if you increase taxation on the businesses, we will pay the difference... through higher prices for goods, and layoffs.
originally posted by: Bearack
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Bearack
originally posted by: pexx421
I don't really understand most of you here. Sanders claims to want to take money out of politics. To break up too big to fail institutions. To use our taxes to support the majority rather than the wealthy elite. What do his opponents want? To wage more war. To continue to cater to the powerful corporations at your expense. To create a Christian theocracy. And this is OK how?
The thing that is not understood, however, is his policy will force all (even the poor) to take a substantial tax burden hit. Not only through our income, but through your wallet as well.
Yes, if you increase taxation on the businesses, we will pay the difference... through higher prices for goods, and layoffs.
Don't forget his policy he speaks about adding a 10% tax on speculation trading. All he means by speculation trading is is all trading as it's all speculative. For those who invest for their retirement know this will only slow our retirement investments to a stagnant crawl.
I actually don't like any form of taxation.
The least amount of taxation in any form forces the government to stay small and gives more economic freedom.
I'll refer back to what I said about the golden rule earlier. Do not impose your will on others if you don't want other people to do the same to you.
originally posted by: fartlordsupreme
a reply to: Bearack
no hes talking about the derivatives market
which needs regulated very badly (the US alone has hundreds of trillions of dollars of exposure.... far more than even exists across the globe)
www.businessinsider.com...
but yeah thats not a problem right?
as long as they have the "freedom" to tank the worlds economies were good