It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I am in utter disbelief that this 'Flat-Earth' nonsense has gained some attention

page: 13
50
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 09:34 PM
link   
a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein

So do you agree with the FE map?

Also, what is surrounding us so we can't get pass?
edit on 294229/1/1616 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 09:44 PM
link   
How do many people see things across great distances of land or water which should not be visible given the rate of curve proposed by the ball earth model, I wonder?

Magic, I suppose.

Sure. Gotta be magic.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   
a reply to: higherconscience
No. Not magic.

Tall things project above the curve of the Earth. That's why you can see the sail of a boat, but not the boat itself, as it sails over the horizon.

Then there is light refraction as well. Physics, not magic.
www.islandnet.com...

edit on 1/29/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage


So I fixed it for him.

I see that. Still don't know where the 111km comes from. I do have a guess though.



The elevation of Polaris coincides with latitude. At 45ºN, 45º above the horizon. At 60ºN, 60º above the horizon. Coincidence? I think not.

That, I do know - www.abovetopsecret.com...

Not only not coincidence but I believe proof the Earth is not flat.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 09:54 PM
link   
a reply to: DenyObfuscation



I see that. Still don't know where the 111km comes from. I do have a guess though.

Is it from the other side of the flat Earth? The side where the sun don't shine?



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 11:18 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I don't agree with anything 100%.
I need solid proof and then maybe.

The theory that I made up as I wrote that post has us not being able to leave the edge because that is the edge of the "simulation" that we are living in.

That would also make the celestial bodies be actual projections from the top of the simulated universe.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 11:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
a reply to: TerryDon79

I don't agree with anything 100%.
I need solid proof and then maybe.

The theory that I made up as I wrote that post has us not being able to leave the edge because that is the edge of the "simulation" that we are living in.

That would also make the celestial bodies be actual projections from the top of the simulated universe.



Ok, I think I understand.

Matrix theory?



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 11:48 PM
link   
a reply to: M4nWithNoN4me

Probably the same idiots who believe in chemtrails



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 12:02 AM
link   
a reply to: M4nWithNoN4me

Very comical OP!

Are you serious?

Is this really a movement?

I've never heard of it and wouldn't have believed it.



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 12:07 AM
link   
a reply to: M4nWithNoN4me

to serve an outside agenda...
Yes, most defiantly! I would just replace one word "Outside", with, "inside". There, that looks better



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 12:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Willtell




Is this really a movement?

No.
That's not really the right word.

"Down with a round Earth!"



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 12:12 AM
link   
What do they do when they get on a airplane. Go blind? Or don't look down



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 12:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Willtell




Is this really a movement?

No.
That's not really the right word.

"Down with a round Earth!"


Don't say that!

I'll cry oblate spheroids



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 12:18 AM
link   
I really think the only reason someone would argue the earth is flat is for the sake of arguing and attention.
It's been proven without a doubt and I feel dumber for even have participated in this discussion.



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 12:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Slickinfinity



It's been proven without a doubt and I feel dumber for even have participated in this discussion.

Participating in a discussion does not contribute to dumbness. Depending upon the level of participation, of course.



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 01:18 AM
link   
Doesn't this just end the thread? I mean, #, you can SEE it.




posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 01:20 AM
link   
So we have gone about 4 pages without anyone responding to my posts on page 8 and 9 proving a FE is impossible. Funny how they ignore the evidence.



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 01:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
So we have gone about 4 pages without anyone responding to my posts on page 8 and 9 proving a FE is impossible. Funny how they ignore the evidence.


Ignore it, put your fingers in your ears and go lalala.

That way it doesn't exist.

That's the only way FE works.



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 01:42 AM
link   
All one has to do is look at the 2 most commonly observed bodies from Earth, namely the moon and sun to realise there's something fairly standard about the shape of this planet we live on. Coupled together with the thousands of pictures we have taken from satellites and other space probes. However the real coup-de-grace tell them to look at a cockpit video from a high altitude aircraft or weather ballon with a camera, you can see the curvature of the earth FFS! Check out Felix Baumgartner's stunt - nuff said! Lunacy in the extreme!



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 01:46 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Yep.

Ross Ice Shelf. Palmer and Rothera. Absolute proof FE is impossible.

Any takers for the challenge?



new topics

top topics



 
50
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join