It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Take the 2016 Presidential Poll: From AboveTopSecret.com and Disinfo.com

page: 6
72
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 10:45 PM
link   
Just a heads up I'm pretty sure that I have been able to vote 4 times in this poll by simply closing my browser and quickly running CCleaner.

Nothing malicious, I just wanted to see if it could be done. 2 for Sanders and 2 for Trump for good measure, since I support both candidates over the rest of the field.
edit on 25-1-2016 by Konduit because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 10:48 PM
link   
I don't see a poll anywhere...?



EDIT: Nevermind, it was in the sidebar. Duh!
edit on 25-1-2016 by MystikMushroom because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 10:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I don't see a poll anywhere...?



Go to the disinfo site and scroll down a bit. It should be on the right.



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 10:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Konduit

The system eventually blacklists any IP's with more than two votes. You might not be able to use our polls again.



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 10:57 PM
link   
I voted for Sanders but Trump would come in as my second choice.
I am voting to take power away from the Globalists.
America Comes First.



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 10:59 PM
link   
a reply to: jacobe001

While Trump is popular because he isn't a politician rest assured between Sanders and himself, the Globalists want Trump.



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 11:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Restricted
Commie, Socialist - damn near the same thing.

There's one in the WH now and he is a disaster on two legs.

I'm in a lunatic asylum here. I can't explain the extreme stupidity of the American voter any other way.

Pass me some Prozac . . . Or Xanax or something.

God help us all.


Obama is a Globalist looking after the Bankers on Wall Street and Global Corporations.
One only needs to look at his top donors to see this.
Not to mention his fast tracking the TPP
edit on 25-1-2016 by jacobe001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 11:06 PM
link   
a reply to: SkepticOverlord

Well that sucks, my second vote was by accident since CCleaner runs automatically when my computer starts.

When I clicked the link again to see the results it brought me back to the poll and I unwittingly voted again. For good measure I continued to test it to see if the results could in fact be skewed.

Again nothing malicious, just curiosity. I guess I'll have to reset my modem in the future.
edit on 25-1-2016 by Konduit because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 11:13 PM
link   
In my opinion , I dont care who is sworn in in 2017 . Just as long as the current POTUS is gone....Sanders , Clinton , Trump , Putin , Assad etc , or someone off the street.



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 11:17 PM
link   
a reply to: jacobe001

And Holder, who has since retired from AG and is back on Wall Street continuing his dirty work.
edit on 25-1-2016 by Swills because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 11:23 PM
link   
a reply to: SkepticOverlord

Sanders in the lead...

Sanders 41% (378 votes)


Trump 34.49% (318 votes)


Paul 8.89% (82 votes)


Cruz 4.88% (45 votes)


Clinton 3.15% (29 votes)



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 11:27 PM
link   
a reply to: jacobe001

Remember when Big O named Geithner as Secretary of Treasury.

Talk about letting the fox in the hen house.
edit on 25-1-2016 by Konduit because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 12:05 AM
link   
If people really want to know what sander's about, watch 1984..



posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 12:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: madenusa
The Congress could have stopped everything that's happening; the wars, the Wall Street takeover, the TRILLION DOLLAR defense budget they just passed. Our so-called representatives have sold us out www.kickthemallout.com...


Trillion dollars you say.

I wonder what the hell it is being spent on.

The nuclear missiles,cruise missiles, and other weapon systems from the Bush era have either been gutted or canceled.

From the comanche,f-22, to the FCS sytems to the tomahawk, and hellfire.

Hell it would take over 5 trillion just to get back what we have lost over the last eight years.

Meanwhile the rest of the world is modernizing, and building systems that were designed in built in this century.

Like Russia, and China.



posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 12:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: jacobe001

Remember when Big O named Geithner as Secretary of Treasury.

Talk about letting the fox in the hen house.


Big O?








posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 12:49 AM
link   
Voted for Paul.

Im going to stick to my principles of freedom, liberty, and not taxing the current and next generations into oblivion.
edit on 1/26/2016 by ugie1028 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 12:52 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

It's being spent on an extremely inefficient MIC, or researching alien tech. Only thing that justifies the insane spending.

But no, cut Social Security, cut Medicare, cut Planned Parenthood, cut anything but the Military and corporate subsidiaries.
edit on 26/1/2016 by Eilasvaleleyn because: Reasons



posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 12:57 AM
link   
a reply to: ugie1028

Who's doing that? Normally people would say Sanders, but... Well, whatever this guy from Forbes is saying.
It's typically the income tax that affects the vast majority of the population, correct?


Looking at marginal income tax rates alone, Bernie could say, that he is less of a socialist than Ronald Reagan.



posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 01:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

No to socialism. Period.

His tax plan has a hidden tax. Its called inflation. The taxes go to the interest to the national debt. The more they borrow the less the dollar is worth, the weaker it gets.

No thanks.
edit on 1/26/2016 by ugie1028 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2016 @ 01:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn




It's being spent on an extremely inefficient MIC, or researching alien tech. Only thing that justifies the insane spending.


Is that the MIC in Europe from where we are getting most of our stuff now or China where we get the chips to operate them?

The insanity is idiotic politicians, and Idiotic defense secretaries, and idiotic 'joint chiefs'.

There is enough blame to go around.

The greatest expenditures are pay, and benefits. Not the systems.
edit on 26-1-2016 by neo96 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
72
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join