It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: forkedtongue
Obviously part of such a system is bringing cash back to equivalent worth. As a globally enforced economy, 15 dollars should be 15 dollars in worth everywhere.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: ketsuko
Then you recognize that one way or another this is coming. There's only one way to completely change the government.
Well no, there is another way to fix this.
For big business, banks, and the corporate world to suddenly decide it's in their best interest (which it is) to work towards a more stable and less predatory world economy by adopting a policy of enlightened self interest.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: ketsuko
propose a solution to the problem your pointing out.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: ketsuko
in order for anything to work first we need to eliminate Wall Street and take the money and put it back into the pockets of the employees who earned it.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: DBCowboy
I just said I'd fight and die for human rights issues such as slavery, so what do you think my opinion on such is?
I don't think that multiculturalism is more important than human rights. So yeah, I'm personally not going to accept, "It's my culture" as an acceptable excuse for every depraved action under the sun.
That being said, that's not actually what this is about, the main focus here is a global regulated and enforced economic system with constitutionally inbuilt human rights protections.
It's not actually about micromanaging every facet of government. My goal is to create an economy not so easily taken advantage of by dodging regulations meant to protect the people.
Your trying to muddy the issue by bringing in things not actually related to the economy and work force.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: DBCowboy
Sometimes force is the only ethical option. Not every cultural trait is deserving of the protection of observing the multiculturalism shield.
When slavery was ended in the united states it was a good thing. Doing so destroyed the culture that grew up around that slavery, but I shed not a single tear for it. I'm saddened for the lives lost to make this change, but the culture not a bit.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: ketsuko
The corporate and business world as well as banking is global there is no going back from that. Thanks to the technology we have today it will always stay that way.
Regulations and laws must be able to affect them on the same scale they exist on, or they're mostly worthless. They don't exist like citizens do, they aren't truly restricted to a single nations laws but they control every nations economy.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: DBCowboy
Sometimes force is the only ethical option. Not every cultural trait is deserving of the protection of observing the multiculturalism shield.
When slavery was ended in the united states it was a good thing. Doing so destroyed the culture that grew up around that slavery, but I shed not a single tear for it. I'm saddened for the lives lost to make this change, but the culture not a bit.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: ketsuko
Is that all you care about is your husbands 401k?
He wouldn't even need the damn thing if he got payed what he was actually worth.
Don't they tax your 401k again?