It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ending Poverty is Impossible without Globalization

page: 9
7
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 07:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
The folks for globalization want it by force (admitted) and are for imperialism (admitted) and are for a dissolution of a variety of cultures (admitted).

And then you turn around and want to define it as freedom???



Shades of Orwell ...




posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 07:27 PM
link   

Shades of Orwell ...



Double-Think is a heck of a drug ain't it? LOL
edit on 17-1-2016 by Punisher75 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 07:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: yesyesyes


Globalists and globalization are two different things. All globalization means at it's most basic definition is a world without borders.

There's multiple ways to go about it. Don't confuse one way with the only way.

So tired of supporting globalization meaning supporting corporate control of it.



I am also tired of supporting these company and entities that control our country and world.

I think on day, humanity will come together as one, but I think we are many, many generations off, just look at the attitudes of the people responding to you. They are happy in this manifestation of slavery.



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 07:42 PM
link   
a reply to: yesyesyes

Do you own Apple products?

I don't.



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 08:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Puppylove
Post of the month, Puppylove.. and a bump for content
and idealogy at least.

The Huxley brothers and Orwell, all those globalist prophets
were dead on right. The time is long past when we had the
ability to govern ourselves .. and people who know better
than we have already morphed our psyches into helplessness.
Self governance equates to self control in your culture, and
with no injury to others. There is our global failure... at any level.

At least some of us. I believe in my broken heart that at roughly
twice your age there is no turning back; and there is no such
thing as personal responsibility for one's actions. Most of us
without even noticing gave up our first freedom-- of choice.
We can't even have a say of how we get brainwashed or poisoned:
why would anybody think there's a choice of one's commissar?

Where the inevitable created chaos becomes sufficiently unlivable,
the creators will take over on a larger scale. They won't need inde-
structible Gorts or super weapons, just people tired of war.

There is no alternative now except to let Pike's Third War do
its thing-- so whoever is arrogant enough to resist and survives will
be all equally impoverished and morally exhausted.
Then atheism, statism on a global level and the final installation of
government itself as the only religion will come to pass.
They've been unrelentingly marching toeward it since before our
grandparents were born, and never stop.

Remember the last fallacy is that doing the right thing is rewarded.



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 09:57 PM
link   
I refer you all to this thread You cannot fight globalism.

This debate you have had here is rearguard action, or like the French say "un combat d'arrière garde".



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 05:49 PM
link   
Globalization is a PC term for one world government, and a rebellion against God. Even the European union has the tower of babel for a symbol with the phrase many tongues, one voice. And a building that is designed to look like an unfinished tower in France I think.



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 05:54 PM
link   
a reply to: gosseyn

Globalization will fail, sovereign nations will be around for generations. Nobody wants it, and if they want to fake an alien invasion to unite the world it will backfire. They will not win. They are losing power, which is why they have sights like this to disinform the masses.



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 05:57 PM
link   
a reply to: derfreebie

Wow you can't govern yourself? That's sad. You are supporting fascism, which failed miserably. You would probably dissolve the constitution if you could.



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: samson3od3lana
a reply to: derfreebie

Wow you can't govern yourself? That's sad. You are supporting fascism, which failed miserably. You would probably dissolve the constitution if you could.


I may be a conservative: but asking for someone else to take
responsibility for me or my actions would be rude-- and expensive.
Besides, corporations regularly profile as psychopathic, double no:
and ultra-corporatism to me would be worse than almost any other
flavor of cowpie sandwich. Apologies, but I am a staunch libertardian.







 
7
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join