It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: waarheid
I was born and raised in a Christian family and have been a faithful Christian for my entire life. As far back as I can recall, I was always taught this to mean that man was created in the physical likeness of God.
I am open to other interpretations... and I think there may be some liberty in the way one reads this. Perhaps the answer could possibly be both physical and spiritual, meaning man was created to look like God and there was also a bit of His values and abilities splashed in there. It would make sense to me.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: nonspecific
It took me a few minutes, but i finally tracked down the answer I gave the last time this question was asked;
"I would take this to mean that human life is self-aware, in a sense that doesn’t apply to other living things; intelligent and reasoning and consciously willing.
That would make us the “image” of a God who is self-aware, intelligent and reasoning and consciously willing."
That would be why God follows on immediately by giving instructions about "having dominion" over the earth. The two things go together.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: DISRAELI
"I would take this to mean that human life is self-aware, in a sense that doesn’t apply to other living things; intelligent and reasoning and consciously willing.
Various levels of self-awareness have been demonstrated in animals.
originally posted by: rossacus
Well it can't be physical. People will find other justifications for its truth but to suggest he has 4 limbs and organs sort of undermines his greatness no?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: nonspecific
There is no such thing as a simple question as it pertains to the Bible. To answer your question, it depends on the type of Christian you are talking to when you ask that question. As are all interpretations of ANY passage in the Bible.
originally posted by: nonspecific
Has this been proven?
Maybe he gave us a head start.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
Even if the difference is not absolute, the writer of Genesis would have been impressed by the relative difference.