It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: nonspecific
But that's the thing, there is no defined standard to look at the bible and say "this is a metaphor" or "this should be taken literally". 100% of the Bible is open to individual interpretation of the reader. This is one of my biggest problems in regards to the book being used as a history book.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: nonspecific
Actually, I prefer to think of God as an extra-dimensional being, but that's just me.
originally posted by: nonspecific
Forgive my lack of understanding on this as it may seem like a very simple question.
When the bible says that God created Adam in his own image is it supposed to be interpreted literally?
Does it mean that he created him physically in his own image or does it imply that he created him with specific values and abilities, a moral code as it were?
We usually try to instil certain values in our own children so is which one is the generally accepted interpretation please?
When the bible says that God created Adam in his own image is it supposed to be interpreted literally?
And the LORD God said, "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil.
Genesis 3:22
And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I will demand an accounting from every animal. And from each human being, too, I will demand an accounting for the life of another human being.
Genesis 9:5
originally posted by: rossacus
Well it can't be physical. People will find other justifications for its truth but to suggest he has 4 limbs and organs sort of undermines his greatness no?
originally posted by: nonspecific
Forgive my lack of understanding on this as it may seem like a very simple question.
When the bible says that God created Adam in his own image is it supposed to be interpreted literally?
Does it mean that he created him physically in his own image or does it imply that he created him with specific values and abilities, a moral code as it were?
We usually try to instil certain values in our own children so is which one is the generally accepted interpretation please?