It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: anzha
Picture link.
Interesting pic, that. Looks kinda familiar. Chasing a rabbit there, Ivan?
Anyways...
KRET has sent the proposals for the avionics for the PAK-DA to Tupolev.
The Russians still claim they will have the first flight of the PAK-DA in 2019 and begin testing in 2021. The gap /could/ be they are going to build the airframes without the final avionics in place and then swap in the real ones. I'd speculate they could be doing so because their modsim capabilities are not great.
However, that'd be possible ONLY with a good economy and money flowing from oil. Oil prices I keep hearing are going to hit $30/barrel. If so, I do not see how the Russians could afford this unless they are going to get someone else to foot the bill (re: PAK FA and India).
originally posted by: moebius
That is an image of a Northrop civil flying wing concept: www.nasa.gov...
ROFL.
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: anzha
It kinda reminds me of a plane I've seen elsewhere, just a little lighter in color and less stealthy.
Is it really less stealthy to ground radar? I dont think so.
You have the specs of this yet to be built plane to back that assessment up? I'll admit I was making an assumption with zero evidence to back it up other than the US invented stealth tech.
You are making two assessments... There are People who would argue if the US were the once who invented stealth.
The reason i say this is a stealth bomber when it comes to ground radar, is because of where the intakes are placed. And a ground radar sends it's radar signal from the ground and up. That means the intakes would be hidden from a ground radar signal. I hope i dont have to Draw a line on the image to show this to you?
Who would argue it? Who else has had the tech since the 60's?
Also I can see where the intakes are on the artist's concept of the plane. You know there's a whole lot more than where the intakes are placed when it comes to stealth tech right?