It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Russia has placed ships and submarines capable of launching nuclear missiles in case Turkey under the cover of NATO decides to strike out against the Russian position. President Putin has been clear; Russia will use nuclear weapons if necessary if conventional forces are threatened.
If Ankara opts for a suicide mission of knocking out yet another Su-24, or Su-34, Russia will simply clear the airspace all across the border via the S-400s. If Ankara under the cover of NATO responds by launching the Turkish Army on Russian positions, Russia will use nuclear missiles, drawing NATO into war not only in Syria but potentially also in Europe. And this would include using nuclear missiles to keep Russian strategic use of the Bosphorus open.
Since mid-2014 the Pentagon has run all manner of war games – as many as 16 times, under different scenarios – pitting NATO against Russia. All scenarios were favorable to NATO. All simulations yielded the same victor: Russia.
And that’s why Erdogan’s erratic behavior actually terrifies quite a few real players from Washington to Brussels.
The Pentagon is very much aware of the tremendous heavy metal Russia may unleash if provoked to the limit by someone like Erdogan. Let’s roll out an abridged list.
Russia can use the mighty SS-18 – which NATO codenames “Satan”; each “Satan” carries 10 warheads, with a yield of 750 to 1000 kilotons each, enough to destroy an area the size of New York state.
The Topol M ICBM is the world’s fastest missile at 21 Mach (16,000 miles an hour); against it, there’s no defense. Launched from Moscow, it hits New York City in 18 minutes, and L.A. in 22.8 minutes.
Russian submarines – as well as Chinese submarines – are able to launch offshore the US, striking coastal targets within a minute. Chinese submarines have surfaced next to US aircraft carriers undetected, and Russian submarines can do the same
originally posted by: UnderKingsPeak
Vladimir?
Is that you ?
I had no idea you had time for an ATS account.
so yeah, Go Russia !
originally posted by: Willtell
You see Putin can almost destroy Turkey and the US can't do anyhting.
Then Putin can cease and tell them to back off
And make peace but Turkey is destroyed and the world may be in a serious place
What is the US going to do?
If Turkey gets crazy again Putin will annihilate many of them
FOR WHAT?
The pride of ErDOGan and his little dirty war on Syria
It aint worth it folks
originally posted by: all2human
a reply to: Willtell
Take the nukes off the table and it is obvious there have been back-door agreements made between the US-co and Russia, with Saudi Arabia and allies splintering off.
There isn't enough support from NATO states to war with Russia over Syria and Ukraine.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: ladyinwaiting
Diplomacy is over. Putin has won. The US realizes he is serious and probably told erDOGan to back off.
I'm sure level heads will prevail.
But imagine if we had a barbarian like Christie as president?
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: ladyinwaiting
Diplomacy is over. Putin has won. The US realizes he is serious and probably told erDOGan to back off.
I'm sure level heads will prevail.
But imagine if we had a barbarian like Christie as president?
Or any of the republican candidates. After listening to the debates, can you single out one other than Rand Paul who doesn't want war? (And yet, Rand Paul is not an option, he has too many other little quirks to be Prez.) In fact, I'm hoping some of them will start dropping out. All these candidates are getting old.
Just thinking about it, ugh. I need to go lie down for a bit.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: 23432
The idea is to avoid a nuclear war.
When one side determines that their interests are so vital and that the other side has been so sinister: war in Iraq, Libya, and now Syria, that the other powers that be( Russia and China) has to step in and STOP IT!
Remember Russia and China were conned over Libya
Apparently they don’t intend for that to happen again
You see it’s not about whose right or wrong in this instance, it’s about who has gone too far
And its clear the US and NATO have gone too far
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: 23432
The idea is to avoid a nuclear war.
When one side determines that their interests are so vital and that the other side has been so sinister: war in Iraq, Libya, and now Syria, that the other powers that be( Russia and China) has to step in and STOP IT!
Remember Russia and China were conned over Libya
Apparently they don’t intend for that to happen again
You see it’s not about whose right or wrong in this instance, it’s about who has gone too far
And its clear the US and NATO have gone too far
Riiiiiiight.
The guy saying "I'll totally nuke you in the event of a conventional threat" isn't the one who's "gone too far" in this scenario.
I should've brought my Putin bobble head to work today, dammit. Nobody ever tells me when we're going to bow down to him on ATS.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: 23432
The idea is to avoid a nuclear war.
When one side determines that their interests are so vital and that the other side has been so sinister: war in Iraq, Libya, and now Syria, that the other powers that be( Russia and China) has to step in and STOP IT!
Remember Russia and China were conned over Libya
Apparently they don’t intend for that to happen again
You see it’s not about whose right or wrong in this instance, it’s about who has gone too far
And its clear the US and NATO have gone too far
originally posted by: Willtell
This is serious stuff people on ATS:
Please go to this link and read
www.counterpunch.org...
Pepe Escobar is a serious journalist not an Alex Jones hysteric.
And according to him we know now why the US is going full steam ahead in solving the Syrian war by basically following the Russian lead.
Also it seems Russia is playing VERY HARD BALL since Turkeys cowardly taking down that Russian plane:
Russia has placed ships and submarines capable of launching nuclear missiles in case Turkey under the cover of NATO decides to strike out against the Russian position. President Putin has been clear; Russia will use nuclear weapons if necessary if conventional forces are threatened.
If Ankara opts for a suicide mission of knocking out yet another Su-24, or Su-34, Russia will simply clear the airspace all across the border via the S-400s. If Ankara under the cover of NATO responds by launching the Turkish Army on Russian positions, Russia will use nuclear missiles, drawing NATO into war not only in Syria but potentially also in Europe. And this would include using nuclear missiles to keep Russian strategic use of the Bosphorus open.
Since mid-2014 the Pentagon has run all manner of war games – as many as 16 times, under different scenarios – pitting NATO against Russia. All scenarios were favorable to NATO. All simulations yielded the same victor: Russia.
And that’s why Erdogan’s erratic behavior actually terrifies quite a few real players from Washington to Brussels.
Indeed like most of us on ATS have mentioned this little Napoleonic complex having midget ErDOGan is playing with fire messing with Russia so his little jihad can take over Syria.
A great power, Russia, says BACK THE F___ OFF MIDGET!
You know like the US use to do to little countries like Granada, Panama, Iraq and Libya
Now Russia is playing hard ball