It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ReadLeader
a reply to: alienjuggalo
Ok, so I agree; having been in the situation of the officer, experience is what can advise ones actions; we obviously DO NOT know the entire story; but we do know NOW, (also) @ LSU, good posting BTW; (the officer did not know at that time) that the perp was on PCP;
Knowing that changes the ball game and it is too late and too early to assume anything more than the facts that are involved (the ones that we KNOW of) -
I said that to say this, there was a robbery in my state- (2) young black thugs - WITH weapons... the pharmacist had a CC, shot one of the thugs, and went after the other-----came back and buried a few more rounds in the would be robber....
SO now, excessive force was the charge that put the innocent robbery (for a few seconds) behind bars... because of his actions...
Excessive force? Perhaps... but a flat out nonsensical murder, ... I think not..
originally posted by: amazing
The real issues here are that they charged him with murder. There has to be real issues for a cop to be charged with murder. The guy in Ferguson was never charged with murder even with all of that public pressure. This case is different.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: amazing
The real issues here are that they charged him with murder. There has to be real issues for a cop to be charged with murder. The guy in Ferguson was never charged with murder even with all of that public pressure. This case is different.
Darren Wilson was attacked, that's the difference. Three different autopsies and investigations, including one from the feds, couldn't even pinpoint guilt on Wilson.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: amazing
The real issues here are that they charged him with murder. There has to be real issues for a cop to be charged with murder. The guy in Ferguson was never charged with murder even with all of that public pressure. This case is different.
Darren Wilson was attacked, that's the difference. Three different autopsies and investigations, including one from the feds, couldn't even pinpoint guilt on Wilson.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: amazing
The real issues here are that they charged him with murder. There has to be real issues for a cop to be charged with murder. The guy in Ferguson was never charged with murder even with all of that public pressure. This case is different.
Darren Wilson was attacked, that's the difference. Three different autopsies and investigations, including one from the feds, couldn't even pinpoint guilt on Wilson.
no Wilson was a chump that likes to shoot in the back. the feds were told to go along with things and as soon as the feds hit the town the witnesses began to die off as they closed the case.
once the perp walked away the situation was over and Wilson still had a suspect hiding behind a car that could have killed Wilson if he was armed.
no Wilson lied and I proved it
bottom line on ferguson is that it is very standard to file charges if witnesses are stating different stories.
if you and I both witness a crime and are interviewed then both our statements will be taken into account when filing charges and only during an investigation for a trial is either of our testimonies to be vetted further unless there is video proving otherwise.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: amazing
I'm not sure how much of a difference that will make now.
Here is the video
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: yuppa
everything you said is true but Wilson still murdered brown and it was all covered up and that is why you can now say those things and be true.
there were more than one version of events and the investigation sought to clear the officer.
the feds wield much power in making events read how they want but at the end of the day there was never a trial yet there was ample reason to have one.
however there were many facts that were ignored and covered in my thread that proves at the least that brown gave false statements.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: amazing
The real issues here are that they charged him with murder. There has to be real issues for a cop to be charged with murder. The guy in Ferguson was never charged with murder even with all of that public pressure. This case is different.
Darren Wilson was attacked, that's the difference. Three different autopsies and investigations, including one from the feds, couldn't even pinpoint guilt on Wilson.
I agree. This guy had a knife though. Usually when a suspect has a knife, there is never a charge for a cop.