It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: angrypsycho1977
Like I said in my original post, I think the letter writing campaign was horrible, and I in no way think that she is an innocent. She lied and did some sneaky stuff to even get the letter to his employers. The source I posted agrees with that, even going so far to say
Writing employers is a low blow. And despite Mason’s many flaws as a thinker and a human being, he’s no Nazi.
My problem with the situation is the fact that the retaliation is affecting innocents that have nothing to do in this petty internet argument. These are the same people that decide when they disagree with you the best thing to do is send a swat team to their mother's house and think that is perfectly fine. And people in this thread are applauding these miscreants like they are heroes.
It is disgusting how people are celebrating the fact that people are losing their livelihoods because of internet trolls. If you condone behavior like any of the people involved in this farce on either side have been engaging in, you are just as bad as all of them.
And the youtuber is an ass. That is my opinion.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: Evil_Santa
a reply to: Gryphon66
The issue that you're not seeing is that she attacked because she wanted to ruin him financially because of his opinions and thoughts. She was attacked because the previous sentence is a really screwed up reason for attacking someone.
The thunderfoot guy WAS in the right UNTIL he gave out personal information and then became liable if some thing befalls the lady du e to his revealing her address AND THEN INCITING his followers. Thunderfoot INCITED harm(financial harm) it can be argued. HE should had taken i t up with the ACLU instead but took th e law into his own hands.
Two wrongs dont make a right.
originally posted by: chuck258
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: Evil_Santa
a reply to: Gryphon66
The issue that you're not seeing is that she attacked because she wanted to ruin him financially because of his opinions and thoughts. She was attacked because the previous sentence is a really screwed up reason for attacking someone.
The thunderfoot guy WAS in the right UNTIL he gave out personal information and then became liable if some thing befalls the lady du e to his revealing her address AND THEN INCITING his followers. Thunderfoot INCITED harm(financial harm) it can be argued. HE should had taken i t up with the ACLU instead but took th e law into his own hands.
Two wrongs dont make a right.
He didn't 'take the law into his own hands', he published publicly available information.
Also, do you really, HONESTLY THINK that the ACLU would have went to bat for a guy who is totally against the Third Wave Feminist agenda?
It is impossible to argue either way, as there is no way of conclusively knowing one way or the other why thunderfoots fans acted the way they did. For all we know they felt personally attacked and that's why they reacted.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
My point: did Thunderfoot's followers go after this woman ruthlessly because of her beliefs rather than her actions toward them?
/shrug
Did they seek to harm her financially because of something she said or did that they did not agree with?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: nancyliedersdeaddog
a reply to: Gryphon66
I think Thunderfoot's fans have learned it's not a good idea to write letters to employers/media/police that are full of lies, czech republic needs to rethink their laws when it comes to "speech crimes", don't doxx yourself, Social Justice Warriors are becoming unhinged, Laughing Witch is a pretty sick person, and lying to further your agenda is wrong.
Is that the official definition of social justice warrior?
My point: did Thunderfoot's followers go after this woman ruthlessly because of her beliefs rather than her actions toward them? Did they seek to harm her financially because of something she said or did that they did not agree with?
/shrug
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: everyone
So, it was injustice for one person to attempt to cause Thunderfoot to lose his job or lose financially, but fine when multiple others attempt to cause the Witch to lose financially.
Somehow that just doesn't compute.
originally posted by: deadlyhope
a reply to: everyone
Her employees are losing jobs, I truly think they should file a lawsuit against her and thunderfoot for the combined ignorant actions.
originally posted by: deadlyhope
a reply to: everyone
This is more like punching someone in the face, and then having their gang stab you forty two times in an unfair fight against a mob... That's not justice, it's not fair, it's not equal punishment. Her employees are losing jobs, I truly think they should file a lawsuit against her and thunderfoot for the combined ignorant actions.