It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Free the fart, so it can fly : free online medical advice.
Did you confirm that American 77 struck the Pentagon in a slight left bank? If so, then you debunked your own NoC flight path theory.
Once again, documented physical evidence speaks louder than works.
originally posted by: Pilgrum
a reply to: LaBTop
In the pic you posted taken 'a minute or 2 after impact' there's a smashed light pole just behind the armco railing so it's obviously looking down the SOC path to the impact point. There are no 'conspirators' anywhere near it so how can you explain its bold presence right there at that exact time?
There seems to be no sign of tyre tracks left by a truck that dropped it off there if that's what you want imply.
That pic just adds weight to the SOC observation and damages the NOC theory even further.
There seems to be no sign of tire tracks left by a truck that dropped it off there if that's what you want imply.
So, why don't you enlighten us? Opinions alone, don't fly here.
A reminder from within a minute after impact :
There are many 9/11 witness reports of additional strong explosions INSIDE the Pentagon, after the impact.
GENERATOR BLAST SHAKES HIGH-RISE BUILDING IN DOWNTOWN LA
East Village Explosion Ignites Fire, Fells Buildings and Injures at Least 19
Sparks set Fires and Explosions in Moses Lake
Observation is the name of that game.
The pole is not laying "just behind the railing", it is positioned inside the two blades of that railing, resting on its upholders, i.o.w., on top of it.
Another bad observation. Firstly, I see a tire track in the grass, not from a heavy truck, could be from a tire from a flat bed trailer towed behind a car, as the one above.
LT : It's crystal clear that Penny saw the NoC plane.!
* The hijacked jet slammed into the Pentagon at a ferocious speed.
* Evey Walker Lee : --- The plane approached the Pentagon about six feet off the ground, clipping a light pole, a car antenna, a construction trailer and an emergency generator before slicing into the building, ---
After you read my above, last two decisive NoC WITNESS interviews posts, do you still believe everything this poster brings to the foreground?
The hijacked jet slammed into the Pentagon at a ferocious speed.
skyeagle409 : That debunks your claim that American 77 slammed into the Pentagon at a relatively slow airspeed.
Probst, Frank : Probst took a sidewalk alongside Route 27, which runs near the Pentagon's western face. Traffic was at a standstill because of a road accident. -snip-
"I was standing on the sidewalk (parallel to the site of impact)...and I saw this plane coming right at me at what seemed like 300 miles an hour. I dove towards the ground and watched this great big engine from this beautiful airplane just vaporize," said Frank Probst, a member of the Pentagon renovations crew commented. "It looked like a huge fireball, pieces were flying out everywhere."
Evey Walker Lee : --- The plane approached the Pentagon about six feet off the ground, clipping a light pole, a car antenna, a construction trailer and an emergency generator before slicing into the building, ---
skyeagle409 : In other words, your own eyewitness reference debunks your claim that American 77 passed north of the gas station because all of the downed light poles proved that American 77 passed south of the gas station. I might add that there are no downed light poles that indicate a NoC flight path.
---said Lee Evey, the manager of the Pentagon's ongoing billion-dollar renovation.
-snip- since there are not large pieces of the wings laying outside, did it virtually explode? EVEY: I didn't see it. My people who did see it enter the building describe it as entering the building and then there being flames coming out immediately afterwards. Whether you describe it as an explosion or not, people I talk to who were there, some called it an explosion. Others called it a large fire. I'm not sure. I wasn't there, sir. It's just a guess on my part.---
His aeronautical "rebuttal" of the North of CITGO (NoC) slightly curved flightpath as seen and reported by 23 eyewitnesses on 9/11, is a misinterpretation of honestly reported near-standard banks by the NoC witnesses.
After reading the above EARLIEST witnesses statements to the MAIN MEDIA, on or just after 9/11, readers will start to believe such a plane indeed existed.
... And it had to be flying slower to stay in that turn,...[/qote]
In such a turn, the bank angle at such a low altitude would have had the right wing tip dragging on the ground and striking light poles along a NoC flight path. Nothing of the sort occurred. Even your own eyewitnesses have stated that American 77 flew into the Pentagon at a high rate of speed.
To sum it up, there is no physical evidence that American 77 flew a NoC flight path nor struck the Pentagon anywhere near 250 knots, but well over 400 knots.edit on 29-10-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)
I might add that there are of course no indications of downed light poles that indicate a NoC flight path, since it is not part of the SoC indoctrination.