It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There is nothing in your link that refutes the facts and evidence from my sources.
We can take a look here.
American 77 Flight Crew
American Flight 77 victims at a glance
Why would you advertise the full capability of your security cameras on the world stage? Air disasters have been solved without the aid of video cameras and if you wanted to know what aircraft crashed at the Pentagon, just ask American Airlines. After all, American Airlines announced the loss of American 77 at the Pentagon.
Seriously? Missed the point again, nobody confiscated Pentagon security cams in the first place
Btw, is there any thread in our 9/11 topics you don't hassle with tons of disinfo? The stuff you spread was debunked years ago, ATSliens will have some fun with your horseshoe-bending (again). Promise!
Pentagon Attack Footage
The Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack
Well, if you can't see the picture of what I have just posted
You see, conspiracy theorist are not in the habit of doing homework, so I find myself correcting them on a regular basis.
If you are claiming a B-757 slammed into the Pentagon at 400 knots, we would not have witnessed a 16 foot hole. In fact the plane traveling at that speed would have destroyed half of the Pentagon and would have cause a significant amount of damage.
Now a plane travailing at 230 knots would have done less damaged.
As a response to your video, this video better describes how the Truth Movement has made of mockery of itself. In case you missed it, here it is again.
Try doing time/distance calculations so you can understand that at no time that American 77 headed at the Pentagon at only 230 knots. The time/distance calculations proved that American 77 was flying well over 400 knots.
....actually both the Shanksville and pentagon sites were visited by the first reporter crews to show us video of the scenes and both had no debris....so there ya go.........actually both the Shanksville and pentagon sites were visited by the first reporter crews to show us video of the scenes and both had no debris....so there ya go......
...I'm a pilot and a trained observer and an outdoorsman......
...I gotta tell ya, learn to catch these discrepencies, and learn to discern the witnesses speech for the details that a child would relay....
Oh hail....the damage at the pentagon.......my heavens.....closer to a fb-111f than a passenger liner. now then....
I'm a tellin ya's......if a liner went in at the pentagon.....witnesses would be spread across the metroplex and talking of windows seen on the plane and we would have a ground track that one could bank on, not the catscratch crap we have for witnesses reports.....not just the citgo gas station.
Documented physical evidence inside and outside the Pentagon do not support eyewitness accounts of a NoC flight path.
That was in response to his mentioning United 93.
I might add that over 90% of the wreckage from United 93, along with remains of passengers and crew, were recovered. Let's take a look to see if you are correct.
News Reporter Confirms Pentagon Struck by Aircraft