It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: stargatetravels
I don't buy remote viewing but I definitely believe in the possibility that Mars has artifacts and possibly an ancient civilization once - maybe we even came from there somehow.
There may well be evidence on Mars now regarding its history but for whatever reason, they're not taking the pictures and we're in no hurry to get there.
It's a mystery
originally posted by: stargatetravels
I don't buy remote viewing but I definitely believe in the possibility that Mars has artifacts and possibly an ancient civilization once - maybe we even came from there somehow.
There may well be evidence on Mars now regarding its history but for whatever reason, they're not taking the pictures and we're in no hurry to get there.
It's a mystery
originally posted by: old_god
I believe as a species we had conquered most of the known universe but our ego eventually destroyed us and either history was/is hidden or we simply forgot over the generations (lost knowledge).
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
NASA does not reduce the resolution of images it releases. When images are reproduced in popular media, it is the publisher that reduces the resolution during the publishing process. "Anomaly researchers" prefer to use these degraded images because they afford more opportunity to engage in pareidolia. When the images are cross checked against the original data, which is usually available free of charge from NASA, the anomalies usually disappear.
originally posted by: noonebutme
Well, I have yet to see this general being interviewed on *any* of the mainstream media outlets regarding this amazing revalation.
Why is it only the..."less-than-reputable" sites who will carry his factual statements?
Anyone..?
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: itanosam
Ever thought they are as much in the dark as us?.
originally posted by: noonebutme
Well, I have yet to see this general being interviewed on *any* of the mainstream media outlets regarding this amazing revalation.
Why is it only the..."less-than-reputable" sites who will carry his factual statements?
Anyone..?
originally posted by: Marduk
originally posted by: noonebutme
Well, I have yet to see this general being interviewed on *any* of the mainstream media outlets regarding this amazing revalation.
Why is it only the..."less-than-reputable" sites who will carry his factual statements?
Anyone..?
General Albert Stubblebine was retired because he was in poor health and not the physical type of poor, but the sticking pencils up your nose and saying "wibble" kind
You know he retired in 1984 right, so you can bet, he's really credible on what the Army is doing 30 years after he left.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Please explain, using links to the data.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Please explain, using links to the data.
This should be interesting, but I doubt you will see any such links!
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Marduk
originally posted by: noonebutme
Well, I have yet to see this general being interviewed on *any* of the mainstream media outlets regarding this amazing revalation.
Why is it only the..."less-than-reputable" sites who will carry his factual statements?
Anyone..?
General Albert Stubblebine was retired because he was in poor health and not the physical type of poor, but the sticking pencils up your nose and saying "wibble" kind
You know he retired in 1984 right, so you can bet, he's really credible on what the Army is doing 30 years after he left.
Retired Generals and Admirals and such are still connected, and are usually consulted on global and national security issues. They sit on boards as consultants to presidents, and committees and still retain their top secret security clearances even long after retirement.
Plus, they get cushy jobs as consultants by corporations and are often Liaisons to current military leaders and other high level people inside and outside government.
They might be old, but they are hardly obsolete. And they are still "in the know" when it comes to many current top secret projects.
So, what you mentioned above is really 100% incorrect assumption.
Major General Albert (Bert) N. Stubblebine III (U.S. Army, Retired) graduated from The United States Military Academy (West Point) in 1952, and served in the US Army for 32 years. Starting his career as an Armor officer, he subsequently rose through the ranks to lead troops at every echelon of Army command, and held several senior posts in US Army Intelligence. His commands as a General Officer included the US Army Intelligence Center and School, the Army's Electronic Research and Development Command (ERADCOM) and the US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM). Whilst on active duty Stubblebine also redesigned the intelligence architecture of the United States Army, and restructured the Army Intelligence training curriculum. After his retirement from the Army in 1984 he served until 1990 as the Vice President for Intelligence Systems at BDM Corporation, a private defense sector contractor, and then acted as a part-time consultant to two government contractors; ERIM, and Space Applications Corporation (SAC). More recently, and along with his wife, the psychiatrist Rima Laibow, Stubblebine sat on the Board of Canadian Submarine Technologies Inc...