It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Semicollegiate
BTW Reagan's illegal alien amnesty back in the 80's tells you that the government is not taking care of the nation.
Actually there have been since amnesties from Reagan. Even ole W tried to get on passed through but it was blocked.
The Seven Amnesties Passed by Congress
So they been 'fixing' it for over 40 years each time breaking it worse.
You two are so close to the big picture it isn't funny!
Cloward and Piven, and google Peter Sutherland and his interview with the BBC in 2012!!!! I have already posted it 3 times and don't want to piss of the mods but google it! The immigrant problem and how countries are handling it was predicted and dictated years ago!
originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
OK, I'm a little confused. If someone was a US citizen, they were not asked to prove that they were legally allowed to work. If they were born in another country, they needed to prove that they were legally allowed to work in the US. And the company is being fined for not asking US citizens to prove they were legally allowed to work?
How would a US citizen not be legally allowed to work?
What proof would a US citizen show to prove they are legally allowed to work?
Anti-Discrimination Notice.
It is illegal to discriminate against any work-authorized individual in hiring, discharge,
recruitment or referral for a fee, or in the employment eligibility verification (Form I-9 and E-Verify) process based on
that individual's citizenship status, immigration status or national origin. Employers
CANNOT
specify which
document(s) they will accept from an employee. The refusal to hire an individual because the documentation presented
has a future expiration date may also constitute illegal discrimination. For more information, call the Office of Special
Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) at 1-800-255-7688 (employees), 1-800-255-8155
(employers), or 1-800-237-2515 (TDD), or visit
www.justice.gov/crt/about/osc
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: cavtrooper7
Holy jebus people.
The issue is that required one thing of one person and different things of others and based it off of where they were born!
It isn't about them trying to verify, it is about who they asked and who they didn't!
And how pray tell would you determine their place of birth without seeing soem form of ID? This is easily solved by just checking EVERYONE who applies,and if they get a e verify hit reporting them to ICE and denyying application.
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: xuenchen
I read that a day or 2 ago and was like WTF?
How can the company be fined for obeying Federal law?
Eh, writing is on the wall I guess.........
originally posted by: seeker1963
How can the company be fined for obeying Federal law?
originally posted by: babybunnies
If you're making it illegal to ask and illegal to employ, then you're putting companies in a catch-22, which is unconstitutional.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: VictorVonDoom
From what I understand, they were specifying what they would accept as verification depending on the applicant. That is discrimination.
The employee, or perspective employee, has the right to provide any of the accepted documents without dictate from the employer.
They could argue that they weren't actually requiring these documents before hiring, they were simply giving prospective candidates a partial list of documents that might be required if they were hired and chose to accept, and the applicant misunderstood. It would be pretty hard to prove otherwise.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: VictorVonDoom
They could argue that they weren't actually requiring these documents before hiring, they were simply giving prospective candidates a partial list of documents that might be required if they were hired and chose to accept, and the applicant misunderstood. It would be pretty hard to prove otherwise.
You've never been an employer, have you? That is not how the process works.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: VictorVonDoom
You are supposed to hand the document to the prospective employee, and let them determine which documents they want to provide.