It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: reldra
This decision is a business decision.
Nothing more. Nothing less.
Sales were not good so they decided to stop selling them.
"We previously carried modern sporting rifles in less than a third of our stores," Walmart spokesperson Kory Lundberg told Forbes. "Our merchandising decisions are driven largely by customer demand. In our everyday course of doing business, we are continually reviewing and adjusting our product assortment to meet our customers' needs."
Read more: www.rollingstone.com...
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: reldra
Like I said, ridiculous.
You're expecting a 12 or 16 shot magazine to be effective on 5 or 6 intruders.
Or better yet a close range shotgun shell...
Ridiculous notion.
Who said anyone was coming for me?
That's a red herring deflection.
Seeing how most magazines on shotguns hold more than 6 shells it's more than adequate. Also the range of a shotgun is well beyond the area the average house covers. When it comes to home defense I'll take my shotgun over a POS AR15 any day of the week.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: reldra
First of all, AR-15s aren't automatic weapons. Those are illegal to sell and require a permit.
AR stands for assault rifle. They are semi-automatic, not automatic. Wal-Mart has read the tea-leaves and moved significantly to the left. Notice the lack of media attacks of late on Wal-Mart?
I prefer purchasing my rifles from a lesser F.F.L. outlet who has access to a far larger range of suppliers than is the wont of a Wal-Mart.
More money for the little guy is cool with me....
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
originally posted by: reldra
Wal-Mart
I think this is long overdue. And for Conservatives out there, Ronald Reagan supported this long ago.
Reagan Support Banning Automatic Weapons
They are not for hunting or home defense. I do support other weapons and guns to be owned by people to defend themselves from attackers in general and the government.
Thoughts?
It's all good. Wal-Mart's choice. There will be no shortage of other businesses who will sell and be more than happy to take the money.
I'm kind of standard though. Don't want to provide a product or service, dont. Someone else will. Problem solved.
That does cut out a good amount of idiots that would walk in to buy something either for nefarious purposes or they have no idea in which it works.
I worry about that less in a place like wal Mart and gun store than I do on a street sale. Don't know what I got, how to use it, break it down or clean it, but I sure look bad now.
But back to topic other businesses will fill the void, sell what products you want, provide services you want, to who you want. As someone said it probably helps the non chain local businesses and that's good.
originally posted by: reldra
Reagan Support Banning Automatic Weapons
They are not for hunting or home defense.
originally posted by: Sunwolf
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: reldra
First of all, AR-15s aren't automatic weapons. Those are illegal to sell and require a permit.
AR stands for assault rifle. They are semi-automatic, not automatic. Wal-Mart has read the tea-leaves and moved significantly to the left. Notice the lack of media attacks of late on Wal-Mart?
I prefer purchasing my rifles from a lesser F.F.L. outlet who has access to a far larger range of suppliers than is the wont of a Wal-Mart.
More money for the little guy is cool with me....
Wrong!AR-15 ,THE AR stands for Armalite the original manufacturer.
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: reldra
It's a distraction from my point, thus it's a red herring, intentional or not.
It doesn't matter if some person(s) is/are coming for me or not...
What does that have to do with anything?
What people use to defend their own homes is a personal choice that government & activists shouldn't be allowed to legislate.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: reldra
Reagan Support Banning Automatic Weapons
They are not for hunting or home defense.
Can you provide an example of someone purchasing an automatic weapon from Wal-Mart?
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
originally posted by: reldra
Wal-Mart
I think this is long overdue. And for Conservatives out there, Ronald Reagan supported this long ago.
Reagan Support Banning Automatic Weapons
They are not for hunting or home defense. I do support other weapons and guns to be owned by people to defend themselves from attackers in general and the government.
Thoughts?
It's all good. Wal-Mart's choice. There will be no shortage of other businesses who will sell and be more than happy to take the money.
I'm kind of standard though. Don't want to provide a product or service, dont. Someone else will. Problem solved.
That does cut out a good amount of idiots that would walk in to buy something either for nefarious purposes or they have no idea in which it works.
I worry about that less in a place like wal Mart and gun store than I do on a street sale. Don't know what I got, how to use it, break it down or clean it, but I sure look bad now.
But back to topic other businesses will fill the void, sell what products you want, provide services you want, to who you want. As someone said it probably helps the non chain local businesses and that's good.
Depends. If the non-chain, local business is good on background ckecks and the law. Some may even have free classes. But some are not like that. I still don;t see the need for these guns.
I do too. And a shotgun.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: reldra
Then let's hope your handgun works well enough if those criminals ever break into your residence.
originally posted by: reldra
Wal-Mart
I think this is long overdue. And for Conservatives out there, Ronald Reagan supported this long ago.
Reagan Support Banning Automatic Weapons
They are not for hunting or home defense. I do support other weapons and guns to be owned by people to defend themselves from attackers in general and the government.
Thoughts?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: reldra
I would say it has happened.
It has never happened. You cannot purchase automatic weaponry at Wal-Mart.
Jesus H., if you are going to author a topic at least familiarize yourself with what you are posting.