It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The speed of light does depend on the medium it is travelling in.
originally posted by: akushla99
originally posted by: IAmTheRumble
a reply to: akushla99
lol.
"Sound travels faster in liquids and non-porous solids than in air"
I'm not familiar with the physics, but it may be a case of - being in the right place at the right time...or manufacturing the right place.
I may have said something far too obvious for my understanding - excuse my naivete.
Å99
originally posted by: IAmTheRumble
I have looked extensively into the Lazar case, many things point to him being a fraud, though there a few slivers of evidence supporting him. Most importantly we need to look at his "science". He says element 115 is used in ET craft to warp space-time. This is done by basically amplifying the gravity wave that is exerted from the element. Which today, is recognized as the strong force (holds the particles within the nucleus together). The strong force is used to create an extremely strong warping of space, very much like the warp drive. A video describing how this is done (40 minutes long): www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: joelr
The strong force doesn't work that way and even if it did element 115 would have billions of times more weight.
He also says that the particle idea of gravity (gravitons) is false. He states that very clear. But the strong force (gravity A) HAS particles. They are called gluons but under his theory those would be the gravitons. Those particles mediate the strong force. So that means gravity A is a particle theory (gravitons) and he completely contradicts himself.
His science talk is just a bunch of pop-physics that anyone could throw together in the 1980's after reading one Fred Alan Wolf book.
This so-called color-kinematics duality, when achieved, leads to a simple “double copy” prescription for computing amplitudes in suitable theories of gravity: Take the gauge theory amplitude, remove the color factors and square the kinematic numerator factors. Crudely, a graviton looks very much like two gluons laid on top of each other. If you’ve ever looked at the Feynman rules for gravity, you’d be shocked that such a simple prescription could ever work, but it does.
This year’s (2013) Sakurai Prize of the American Physical Society, one of the most prestigious awards in theoretical particle physics, has been awarded to Zvi Bern, Lance Dixon, and David Kosower “for pathbreaking contributions to the calculation of perturbative scattering amplitudes, which led to a deeper understanding of quantum field theory and to powerful new tools for computing QCD processes.”
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
How does one ensure the most homogeneous space -time density path to travel. Or is that still not well charted and a guessing game?
I get the Mach Drive for the most part but can you explain a little better the Intra-System Drive?
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Bedlam
If there were a way to engineer a clear or homogeneous path using like say a beam in front of the vehicle wouldn't that help smooth out things and prevent the insides looking like some jackson pollok Rorschach splatter pattern.
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: BASSPLYR
So we would have to pick and choose very carefully where we decide to explore and colonize it seems.