It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
All those weirdly burned vehicles on the streets, melted tires and such, were made that way by some sort of radiation event. I'm not waiting for the government to explain it to me.
What melted engine blocks? Are you now claiming that thermite or nukes were planted beneath the hoods of vehicles?
No, but you are.
It is apparent that you are seriously mistaken considering that I debunked nukes at ground zero in New York City with evidence.
The fact is there is no evidence for you to debunk nukes or anything else.
The Dimitri Khalezov "WTC was nuked" hoax
At about 2:00, Dimitri Khalezov talks about the "nuclear warhead that was similar to the nuclear warhead of the missile that hit the Pentagon."
At 11:40, Duff talks about the "nuclear devices" under the WTC and says they're not "mini-nukes"; they're "thermonuclear devices, demolition devices underneath the World Trade Center..." At 17:20, Duff claims that "nuclear munitions are used under major buildings in the US, in a highly secretive program."
Since there is no evidence of such a program and nobody with an IQ above room temperature believes such a program to exist, Duff has no option but to claim the "program" is "highly secretive".
www.takeourworldback.com...
No Evidence of Nuclear Detonation in New York City
* No temperature of millions of degrees generated from a nuclear detonation.
* No blinding flashes generated from a nuclear detonation, much less from 3 nuclear explosions
* No sound of a nuclear detonation, much less from 3 nuclear explosions
* No shockwaves generated from a nuclear explosion
* No EMP generated from a nuclear explosion
* No radioactive fallout generated from a nuclear explosion
* No seismic data generated for a nuclear explosion, much less from 3 nukes.
* No mushroom clouds generated from a nuclear explosion in New York City
* No evidence of a nuclear detonation in New York City
Of course there is, and here is the proof, not to mention that the WTC nuke story was a hoax to begin with.
Perhaps it is, however your sources "opinions" do not prove anything.
NUCLEAR 9/11 UNDENIABLE
9/11 RADIATION CANCER DEATHS CENSORED IN U.S.
When we were told that the 3 towers of the World Trade Center were destroyed by nuclear demolitions, possibly assisted by specialized thermite compounds, it began to make sense. When hundreds of firefighters died of radiation sickness and it was blamed on mysterious and unnamed and classified “toxic soup,” we had proof. When was reported in the London papers but not New York or anywhere else in America, it told us something is seriously wrong.
www.veteranstoday.com...
Gordon Duff Admits to Veterans Today Disinfo
Gordon Duff of Veterans Today Admits To Writing 40% False Information
Duff responds, "Well, I'd like to tell people to only go on the Internet and to only read alternative news sites...but the problem is...even we've been hijacked...I don't know any imaginable way that you can get information...I have as good access to information as anyone, probably - anyone I know of - about 30% of what's on Veteran's Today is patently False. At least 40% of what I write is at least purposefully partially false because if I didn't write false information, I wouldn't be alive. I simply have to do that. I write anything I write, I write between the lines"
www.forbiddenknowledge.tv...
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: firerescue
It amazes me how these fires melted the engine blocks, that cannot happen from just firer alone.
Care to provide evidence engine blocks were melted? No, of course you cannot!
A reported 1400 vehicles were damaged on 9/11. [ Reference] These vehicles had peculiar patterns of damage and some were as far away as FDR Drive (about 7 blocks from the WTC, along the East River). Vehicles had missing door handles for example, windows blown out, window frames deformed, melted engine blocks, steel-belted tires with only the steel belts left, and vehicle front ends destroyed with little or no effect on the back end of the vehicles. What could have caused such extraordinary damage? Portions of cars burned while paper nearby did not.
Now, let's take another look at Gordon Duff in case you missed it before.
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: hellobruce
Care to provide evidence engine blocks were melted? No, of course you cannot!
No problem.
What Melted Cop Cars 7 Blocks From WTC On 911?
The Truth Movement is well aware of Gordon Duff fallacies.
What Melted Cop Cars 7 Blocks From WTC On 911?
The official story about 911 is that burning airplane fuel weakened the steel buildings at the World Trade Center, causing them to collapse. But if that is true, how can one explain the strange damage inflicted upon autos as far away as FDR drive (7 blocks from the WTC )?
No evidence for "melted engine blocks" there, those cars were also moved there during the cleanup....
Funny how they seem surprised rubber burnt, windows were smashed and plastic was melted!
Then, why have 9/11 conspiracy theorist used him as a reference?
It seems that you are unaware that the reference you posted is the disinformation website that I have warned people about.
For an example, it says that the engine blocks were melted and yet, the vehicles themselves clearly show signs they were ever in a molten state. That was alarm bell #1.
The second warning can be found here, as this photo is a hint of disinformation. What is the answer as to the cause of the toasted vehicles from this disinfo reference link?
Disinformation Photo