It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Just Wondering...

page: 21
29
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 05:43 PM
link   
You keep diggin bro. You'll make 800ft.




posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 05:44 PM
link   

edit on 26-7-2015 by In4ormant because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

Let' me put it this way. I knew that you were not knowledgeable in iron or steel because you failed to understand that the steel section in question had been annealed at a temperature that was too low to melt steel.



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 06:04 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409




Let' me put it this way. I knew that you were not knowledgeable in iron or steel because you failed to understand that the steel section in question had been annealed at a temperature that was too low to melt steel.



Please dude, read this crap back to yourself?
How am I supposed to make any sense out of that?
Have you ever heard of annealed glass?
Does it bother me that you're say'n I don't know what annealing is?
Say it some more if you like. Doesn't mean anything to me coming
from you.
edit on Rpm72615v05201500000002 by randyvs because: (no reason given)


And please somebody, anybody tell me why this isn't to be
entered in as evidence against the OS. This has got to be
the only piece of evidence I would ever need to prove the
opposition will lie and photoshop and manipulate and conjure
anything and everything they possibly can. All to maintain
their superficial plastic little worlds. Pathetically!



What a G-D joke.
edit on Rpm72615v21201500000051 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 06:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: skyeagle409






Let' me put it this way. I knew that you were not knowledgeable in iron or steel because you failed to understand that the steel section in question had been annealed at a temperature that was too low to melt steel.



Please dude, read this crap back to yourself?
How am I supposed to make any sense out of that?
Have you ever heard of annealed glass?
Does it bother me that you're say'n I don't know what annealing is?
Say it some more if you like. Doesn't mean anything to me coming
from you.


education.jlab.org...

How many more have to say it?



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 06:26 PM
link   
a reply to: In4ormant

One more simulation out of you young man and you're
gonna be the one get'n slapped.



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: In4ormant

One more simulation out of you young man and you're
gonna be the one get'n slapped.


Your skill at evasion is remarkable. Next time my wife starts into me about wanting new appliances up I'm gonna consult you.



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: In4ormant

Wouldn't surpise me, if you lack as much knowledge about
appliances as you do this subject? Then you most likely
should.

I've wasted all the time I'm going to here. So take you're parting shots guys.
I'll read them.
edit on Rpm72615v47201500000009 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 06:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: In4ormant

Wouldn't surpise me, if you lack as much knowledge about
appliances as you do this subject? Then you most likely
should.


You keep dodging mate, you might actually trip over the truth with all that feet shuffling.



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: In4ormant

There's nothing to dodge pal. Bye!



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 07:29 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 08:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs

This has got to be the only piece of evidence I would ever need to prove the
opposition will lie and photoshop and manipulate and conjure
anything and everything they possibly can.



What a G-D joke.


OK then present your evidence. Prove this photo is a lie and has been photoshoped and manipulated.

You made the statement. If you cant back it up then you are lying and manipulating to conjure
anything and everything you possibly can to avoid answering the explosives question.
edit on 26-7-2015 by waypastvne because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 08:13 PM
link   
One last addition I've decided this thread to be worthy of
despite my lack of knowledge in this direction.
Would real terrorists looking to destroy america ineffectually
fly airplanes into buildings? When our power grid is so vulnerable
as we can all see perfectly.



Can you imagine what those planes might have caused if flown
into nuclear plants and power stations? Just one more reason
the OS really bothers me. But it's just one of my questions
that I lack any real knowledge of admittedly. But it would've
made more sense to me.



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: waypastvne

Are you kidding just look at it!



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 08:37 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs




Would real terrorists looking to destroy america ineffectually
fly airplanes into buildings?

You choose your targets based on your goals.
Pearl harbor was chosen because the Japanese wanted control of the Pacific region not to destroy America.
WTC was chosen as a symbol of capitalism.
The Pentagon was a symbol of American military.

ISIS uses beheadings as symbol instead of a bullet.



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 08:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: waypastvne

Are you kidding just look at it!


I did look at it. I see two columns that have failed under compression due to fire. That is something you say cant happen. It would be in your interest to prove it fake.

Are you going to present some evidence that the photo has been photoshoped?

You made the claim. Show us the evidence.

Are you an expert on photoshop? What about this photo:



Is it real or has it been manipulated by a member of the truth movement ?

edit on 26-7-2015 by waypastvne because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 08:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: waypastvne

Are you kidding just look at it!


No broken/bent steel here. We are all hallucinating.



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 08:40 PM
link   
a reply to: samkent
The attack on Pearl Harbor was conceived as tactical, trouble is the tactical targets (carriers) were not there at the time.

The goals of terrorism are neither tactical nor strategic.



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 08:49 PM
link   
a reply to: samkent

I merely pose the question lacking any real knowledge of
symbolism and even less about the inner workings of
capitolism. But I was under the impression some how
that the target was americans and our way of life.
And planes into buildings is pretty ineffectual you
must admit? Surely.
edit on Rpm72615v52201500000021 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2015 @ 08:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: samkent

I merely pose the question lacking any real knowledge of
symbolism and even less about the inner workings of
capitolism. But I was under the impression some how
that the target was americans and our way of life.
And planes into buildings is pretty ineffectual you
must admit? Surely.


I'd say they were pretty damn effectual



new topics

top topics



 
29
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join