It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: skyeagle409
And please somebody, anybody tell me why this isn't to be
entered in as evidence against the OS. This has got to be
the only piece of evidence I would ever need to prove the
opposition will lie and photoshop and manipulate and conjure
anything and everything they possibly can. All to maintain
their superficial plastic little worlds. Pathetically!
What a G-D joke.
The thing is, that proves exactly what I been telling him the whole time. He just has no idea what he's talking about.
He need s to dismiss himself from the argument cause, he's only hurting his cause.
I bet the building did not collapse free fall and turn to a pile a dust with projectiles flying out from the core.
Give it a rest, you will not find one single example of any buildings falling like these 3 did in the history of mankind, NONE, without the use of a controlled demolition.
Totally Collapsed 21-Story Steel Frame Office Building
Total collapse of 21-story steel frame office building. Note building standing in background. Many tall concrete structures whose designs met the requirements of the building code performed well.
I do not recall who said that it was AT free fall accelerations when the towers dropped. It is actually NEAR free fall accelerations.
The point is there was far too little resistance holding up the fall for buildings constructed like these.
Also you can never explain the collapse of the third skyscraper.
These seemingly impregnable behemoths, he told me, went down quickly because they lacked the cagelike internal steel-frame structure typical of tall buildings and were supported instead by metal load-bearing outer walls that hastened the collapse once they were breached.
This reasonable explanation, which I unquestioningly disseminated, turned out to be the exact opposite of the truth and is corrected, along with a number of other erroneous received ideas, by the authors of this absorbing and disturbing book.
It was, in fact, the towers' innovative external engineering that redistributed the walls' structural forces around the gaping holes after the attacks and kept the buildings standing long enough for a vast majority of their occupants to escape. Despite the ghastly death toll, the high survival rate for those in the towers below the impact points of the hijacked jets was no less than a miracle. Had the towers possessed conventional steel skeletons, they would have probably snapped and immediately fallen over, causing more catastrophic collateral damage than they did by crumpling onto their footprints.
I heard no explosions that can be attributed to explosives, which explains why no explosions were detected by seismic monitors in the area and of course, why demolition experts in the area working on another project who have stated that they heard no demolition explosions.
Not one shred of demolition hardware was ever found within the rubble at ground zero, which underlines the fact no explosives were used. In addition, it would have been impossible to rig the WTC buildings with explosives effectively in a crowded building.
It would have taken many months just to pre-weaken the structures and that is a very dirty and noisy process that would not have gone unnoticed. The fact that the 1993 WTC 1 bombing failed to bring down that building is an example that explosives alone could not have brought down the WTC builidngs.
Add to the fact that the collapse of the WTC Towers began where they were struck by the aircraft and nowhere else, which underlines the fact that there were no demolition explosives planted because there were no secondary explosions.
Disinformation Killed 9/11 “Truth”
The claim that a missile destroyed the Pentagon lives on, probably the first major 9/11 disinformation coup, and it has long been cited by international corporate media as a sure indicator of mental illness or stupidity. You can point at 42 Pentagon witnesses who saw a plane, noting that zero eyewitnesses ever reported a missile, but, in a self-reinforcing religious mind wash, contrary evidence is handily dismissed. The messenger is bludgeoned.
A steaming case of a “honey pot” trap, this Pentagon/missile theory originated from a website that called itself “Silent But Deadly,” hosted in France starting in June of 2003 (Warning: link to disinformation website). This missile theory popped up nearly two years after the actual 9/11 attacks and after a Congressional investigation needed to be censored by the White House, in order to protect their Saudi friends and possible co-conspirators.