posted on Jul, 24 2015 @ 01:43 PM
After 14 years of information and disinformation about conspiracies concerning the events that transpired that day, how many of you have changed your
Did you believe the original media reported version and now you don't? Or did you not believe it and now you do? Or has your belief been exonerated
Did the findings of NIST convince you? Have you done any research on your own? Have you just decided no matter what you are shown or told that your
mind will always be unable to change either way?
I never believed the official version, ever! All that I have researched has only confirmed things for me.
I am not going to show videos or provide links, they have all been seen and done.
I will only make a few comments about why I do not think these events occurred the way NIST suggested or was reported by the MSM then or since.
Not only was there never a building reinforced with steel burned down before that day, there has not been a single one since.
Isn't it a bit strange that the only recorded steel buildings that have ever collapsed in free fall, foot print without the use of "demolition",
happened on the same day, not just one but 3? I find that to be extremely unlikely odds, astronomical even. The heat necessary to melt or even bend
steel was not caused by jet fuel and office furnishings. One dissipates quickly and the other is fire retardant. Something else had to generate the
extreme heat that resulted in fires for weeks after. Steel enforced buildings just do not fall that way without assistance.
The people they claim are responsible had no motive and gained absolutely nothing and the one's that did gain from it have gotten away with murder
repeatedly since and profited in the same manner continuously since. They wanted control. They wanted money. They wanted war. They wanted to get
rid of investigations. They wanted to eliminate. They had motive. Larry Silverstein, The Bush family, The Carlyle Group, Haliburton just to name a
few. This has been documented. The trade centers (1&2) were full of asbestos, not only is that a fire retardant itself, it is extremely toxic and
expensive to remove. Building 7 was relatively new and housed some very sensitive material and investigations that disappeared that day, too. How
convenient? There are way to many motives for these people. 3 trillion dollars unaccounted for wiped out by a strategic plane crash to the pentagon?
Also, very convenient? That pipeline they wanted. Documented.
The greatest defense system in the world? Where was the defense that day? I feel so much safer today. Where are the black boxes from those planes?
Curious how the NTSB investigations were handled, don't you think? I have seen lesser circumstances that didn't involve the destruction of that day
get far more attention. Strange?
The endless list of inconsistencies is all the more reason to not believe the official version, so, if you still believe they have given you the
truth, why? I just have to know how anyone can believe the "cock and bull" version still, after 14 years?