It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I gave up Ayn Rand for Bernie Sanders: How I grew up and traded libertarianism for a progressive “socialist”
Most self-identifying "libertarians" actually subscribe to a bankrupt ideology. What if they all opened their eyes?
Sanders calls himself a socialist, which is just about as big an American insult as you get. Conventional politicians and business people decry the evils of socialism, except when they are wallowing in it. America has the most generous socialist government that has ever existed in human history, but it only applies to millionaires. If you’re on the board of a bank or massive corporation, the government has unlimited socialism for you. No cost loans, favorable bankruptcy laws, bailouts and tax breaks without limit. At the same time, unemployed students cannot discharge student loans no matter how bleak their financial circumstances. Socialism has been inverted. Rather than deployed for the poor and struggling, it’s doled out endlessly to people who don’t need it.
The majority has ceased to rule here. Most people don’t even bother to vote, and that’s by design. Liberal ideas would always win if everyone voted, which is why there is such a nonstop, furious attack on voting by the right. America is under siege by a small, insular aristocracy, and they won’t go down without a fight. It’s telling that we could easily see candidates from only two “noble” families, the Bushes and the Clintons, in our next election. We need no more perfect example of American feudalism than power being passed back and forth between ruling houses.
Of course we all know that there is lots of welfare for Wall Street in the US of A's budget, Bernie Sanders thinks there is to much:
If you’re on the board of a bank or massive corporation, the government has unlimited socialism for you.
originally posted by: ChiefD
a reply to: AlaskanDad
Excellent post, S&F!
I love what the article stated about the attack on voting by the right wing. It makes so much sense. The right try to pass laws that make it more difficult for poor and oppressed people to vote.
originally posted by: neo96
Since all social programs are corporate welfare especially those on Wall Street like JP Morgan, and Mosanto. I sincerely doubt Sanders will do anything about THAT corporate welfare.
Or if your a green corporation there's lots of 'socialism' for you too. Even if one goes Bankrupt lots more to go around.
The ideology of robbing from the haves(socialism) giving to the have nots ALL so they can go out, and buy more stuff.
Sanders is a proponent of the Welfare Industrial Complex.
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
POST REMOVED BY STAFF
The term "Corporate Welfare" refers to the process of giving money and aid to Corporate Entities mostly through subsidies. Giving money to individuals as in Welfare would not qualify as "Corporate Welfare" at all.
Because robbing from the poor to give to the rich is a better idea??? Only in "opposite land" would that even make sense.
Wrong. Sanders is a supporter of small business and the working middle class and the poor. He encourages a strong working population with jobs and a future and a decent living standard. However he also realizes that such a thing is impossible in a system that has been engineered to favor the rich and power which has resulted in .01% of people owning 90% of everything while the rest have to share the scraps that are left over. At that point some form of equalization has to occur or you're left with despotism.
Democratic socialists do not want to create an all-powerful government bureaucracy. But we do not want big corporate bureaucracies to control our society either. Rather, we believe that social and economic decisions should be made by those whom they most affect.
Today, corporate executives who answer only to themselves and a few wealthy stockholders make basic economic decisions affecting millions of people. Resources are used to make money for capitalists rather than to meet human needs. We believe that the workers and consumers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them.
Social ownership could take many forms, such as worker-owned cooperatives or publicly owned enterprises managed by workers and consumer representatives. Democratic socialists favor as much decentralization as possible. While the large concentrations of capital in industries such as energy and steel may necessitate some form of state ownership, many consumer-goods industries might be best run as cooperatives.
Democratic socialists have long rejected the belief that the whole economy should be centrally planned. While we believe that democratic planning can shape major social investments like mass transit, housing, and energy, market mechanisms are needed to determine the demand for many consumer goods. www.dsausa.org...
originally posted by: neo96
Worried eh?
Sanders has a snows balls chance in becoming potus.
My beef is the idolatry of him.
Exactly by the same people who idolize the current guy in the oval office that whispered sweet nothing in to the masses ears, and fell for it hook,line, and sinker.
Wow trying to bury this thread with negative opinion, that is the type of thing the Dig patriots were famous for!
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: neo96
I love seeing two neo posts already; his quick and lame attack shows that the right is both worried about Bernie Sanders and his message of wage equality.
Go Bernie!
Worried eh?
Sanders has a snows balls chance in becoming potus.
My beef is the idolatry of him.
Exactly by the same people who idolize the current guy in the oval office that whispered sweet nothing in to the masses ears, and fell for it hook,line, and sinker.