It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
a reply to: waypastvne
Good grief, do you actually suggest that the very same trusses that NIST said were weak enough to simply break away from the core to create the pancake effect now all of the sudden are strong enough to tranfer kinetic energy in such amounts that he entire steel colums of the core simply vaporised?
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
a reply to: waypastvne
Good grief, do you actually suggest that the very same bolts that NIST said were weak enough to simply break away from the core to create the pancake effect now all of the sudden are strong enough to tranfer kinetic energy in such amounts that he entire steel colums of the core simply vaporised?
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
a reply to: scottyirnbru
If that's a bit too strong to your liking, substitute any word that you know that signifies something like "going from a concrete state into another (inconcrete) state". Crumble, pulverise, what you like.
I believe that what I meant was clear enough though: the WTC towers largely turned into dust. That takes HUGE amounts of energy. That energy could never be transferred to the core by these bolts, as they were - according to NIST at least - not strong enough to hold the floors and so gave way to allow for the "pancake effect" to happen.
Which of the two options is the one you think is true:
- the bolts were strong enough to tranfer the kinetic energy stored in the (thin) truss/floor construction - but how do you explain than that the floors fell in the first place, and how come this happened with almost free fall speed?
- the bolts weren't strong enough, the floors fell - which leaves the question how the kinetic energy you think caused the central column to crumble real time too transferred to the core to pulverise that?
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
a reply to: scottyirnbru
If that's a bit too strong to your liking, substitute any word that you know that signifies something like "going from a concrete state into another (inconcrete) state". Crumble, pulverise, what you like.
I believe that what I meant was clear enough though: the WTC towers largely turned into dust. That takes HUGE amounts of energy. That energy could never be transferred to the core by these bolts, as they were - according to NIST at least - not strong enough to hold the floors and so gave way to allow for the "pancake effect" to happen.
Which of the two options is the one you think is true:
- the bolts were strong enough to tranfer the kinetic energy stored in the (thin) truss/floor construction - but how do you explain than that the floors fell in the first place, and how come this happened with almost free fall speed?
- the bolts weren't strong enough, the floors fell - which leaves the question how the kinetic energy you think caused the central column to crumble real time too transferred to the core to pulverise that?
When a hijacked airplane struck the north tower of the World Trade Center, six men, including Polish immigrant window washer Jan Demczur, found themselves trapped in an express elevator at the 50th floor. Thinking quickly, Demczur and the others pried open the elevator doors and used this squeegee handle to cut their way through the drywall of the elevator shaft. They squeezed through the hole in the wall, fleeing from the building just minutes before the tower fell.
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
a reply to: scottyirnbru
Indeed. How very convenient. I still believe the alien ray is the far better explanation
(where did all the thermal energy come from?)
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
a reply to: scottyirnbru
Indeed. How very convenient. I still believe the alien ray is the far better explanation
(where did all the thermal energy come from?)
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
So many replies and no one has yet attempted to debunk the deep explosive caught on tape that help bring down world trade center 7 in a controlled manner.
The owner and the secretary of state both have said that they building was pulled and brought down in a controlled fashion.
originally posted by: Insolubrious
Re: poster who said WTC explosion sounds just like an internal collapse.
Shaped Charge Explosion Compared to WTC Explosion on 911.
Have nice day.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
So many replies and no one has yet attempted to debunk the deep explosive caught on tape that help bring down world trade center 7 in a controlled manner.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
I have heard some silly debunkers here claim that the boom was a sonic boom from a fighter
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
originally posted by: Insolubrious
Re: poster who said WTC explosion sounds just like an internal collapse.
Shaped Charge Explosion Compared to WTC Explosion on 911.
Have nice day.
That explosion is immense. I have heard some silly debunkers here claim that the boom was a sonic boom from a fighter even though the guy says the building will be coming down soon after hearing it. Watch vid.
originally posted by: Shiloh7
a reply to: scottyirnbru
Did the owners get an insurance payment for the loss of their building?