It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
These images show a controlled collapse
no interior fell outside of its footprint.
bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse.[44] During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.[45] Around 3:30 pm, FDNY Chief Daniel A. Nigro decided to halt rescue operations, surface removal, and searches along the surface of the debris near 7 World Trade Center and evacuate the area due to concerns for the safety of personnel
The owner of the towers and the Secretary of state have both claimed that they were brought down in a controlled manner
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
[ This is just one example.
originally posted by: waypastvne
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
[ This is just one example.
I remember that paper it was hilarious. These are the important points so stay with me. In the first part of the paper he states that there was:
400 000 000 000 joules of potential energy
In his conclusion he states:
The amount of energy required to expand the North Tower's dust cloud was many times the entire potential energy of the tower's elevated mass due to gravity. The over 10-fold disparity between the most conservative estimate and the gravitational energy is not easily dismissed as reflecting uncertainties in quantitative assessments.
so he is saying that it would take at least:
4000 000 000 000 joules of energy per building to destroy them.
1 ton TNT = 4 184 000 000 joules
400 000 000 000 divided by 4 184 000 000 = 956 tones of TNT needed to destroy the towers.
956 tones divided by 115 floors = 8.3 tones
So Jim Hoffman is claiming that that 8.5 tones of TNT would need to be placed on every floor in order to make WTC ! & 2 collapse.
You might want to stop and think about that for a minute. Yes 8.3 tones of TNT per floor had to be snuck in and hidden without any one noticing.
Do you Think there might be something wrong in his calculations?
a reply to: hellobruce
No they do not - where is your evidence it was aa controlled collapse?
Where is the evidence tonnes of explosives, km of wire, holes were knocked in walls, man years of work was done to wire the building up for demolition?
How did they manage to sneak in tonnes of explosives, knock holes in the walls and install km of wiring without anyone noticing?
originally posted by: firerescue
Add to that fact that for months during cleanup had all sort of structural engineers, bomb squad tech, arson investigators,
FBI/ATF/EPA and every other fed agency was crawling over the building
Nobody saw anything remotely like explosive damage, wiring, shock tubes or anything else
Our local bomb squad spent 3 weeks at WTC
originally posted by: waypastvne
a reply to: Another_Nut
And how many joules are in a ton of TNT (the answer is in the post right above yours)
originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: Another_Nut
Joules is a measure of ENERGY so you dont even know what you are talking about !!!
originally posted by: Another_Nut
originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: Another_Nut
Joules is a measure of ENERGY so you dont even know what you are talking about !!!
Energy when applying a (blank)
I'll let you fill in the blank
Eta are yiu saying joules=tnt?
Or are yiu just trying to distract from the facts ?
Eta I'll go one better I'll say you are correct.
Now
How does that Make anything else in my post incorrect?
1 ton of tnt =4 184 000 000 joules
originally posted by: Another_Nut
How many joules are in a laser?
str.llnl.gov...
Livermore's Petawatt laser operated for three years, until its last shot was fired on May 27, 1999. At full energy of about 680 joules,
originally posted by: 1freedomwriter
The look on the Presidents face is all one needs. From a psychology stand point, it is a look of disgruntled contempt and not surprise.
The turning of the mouth and biting of the inner lip is textbook, "I can't believe they actually did that." Like how a parent looks when their child did something they were not supposed. Then a racing mind as to what o do now.
If he was not in on it he was to dumb and powerless to stop it.
Add that too all the nonsensical events that took place. I also like this video. www.youtube.com...
Of course Building 7 was taken down.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
"Reports that the building would come down or it would be TAKEN DOWN"
They weren't going to be able to fight any fires so the smartest thing for them to do is pull it and they watched the building fall. Thank goodness, there was no loss of life or significant property damage.
The owners made a good call to PULL IT. ( controlled collapse)
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
The alien disintegration ray still is the more plausible explanation
Ah, the aliens did it - well that explains the UFO in the video posted!
Why did you show the picture of the mast falling, do you think that is evidence of your alien weapon from space?