It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
It doesn't make any sense at all.
There is one more suspicious item, the central columns simply vanished into a puff of dust (notice, that the collapsing flooring computer simulation disregards the central columns completely - either a stupid engineering programmer or they think we engineers are complete idiots).
Yet you think the FDNY installing tonnes of explosives in a building, with no one noticing, so they can just blow the building up for whatever!
actually.. no they didn't turn magically into dust, just fell like the rest. Here's some footage of the central columns of the North Tower
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: wmd_2008
You decided to call me truther, then I decide to call you a liar.
It looks like a controlled demo and he said they pulled it. He didn't say to pull them (the firemen) of, did he?
Listen again:
You know the difference, my dear weapon of mass deflection. Do you?
And by the way... did you see the missing study regarding the core-collapse of those two WTC-buildings?
There is no doubt he didn't mean pull anyone out. He has claimed numerous times that it was a controlled collapse to minimize casualties and property damage.
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: intrptr
The poster I responded to said just that. Firetruck "flipped on its side" and crew killed. You know how heavy a firetruck is?
The truck was LADDER 11 - crew were inside Marriott Hotel (WTC 3) when was crushed first by collapse of WTC 2 (South Tower) then WTC 1 (North Tower) . They were searching the hotel to get everyone out
What do you think you see in the video I posted?
It must suck being a person who 100% believes the official story.... lol
originally posted by: TWILITE22
originally posted by: Kromlech
why do people continue to deny what is clearly in front of their face? why do they wish for us to not see what is there? I find that very interesting...
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: TWILITE22
Small group of FDNY reached 78th floor, Battalion Chief Palmer, FDNY Fire Marshall Ron Buca and crew from Ladder 15
78th floor was lower edge of the impact area, struck by wingtip of United 175 in a steep bank
Estimated over 100 people were there waiting for elevators - 78 was Sky Lobby where people changed from express
elevator to local elevator which stopped on every floor
Palmer who knew building well found freight elevator to 41th floor before running remainder of distance
Buca actually ran from street to 78th floor !
As a Sky Lobby lacked most of the combustible material in offices - was marble and tile
The voices, captured on a tape of Fire Department radio transmissions, betray no fear. The words are matter-of-fact.
Two hose lines are needed, Chief Orio Palmer says from an upper floor of the badly damaged south tower at the World Trade Center. Just two hose lines to attack two isolated pockets of fire. "We should be able to knock it down with two lines," he tells the firefighters of Ladder Company 15 who were following him up the stairs of the doomed tower.
But sections of the tape provide vivid images of the firefighters: the breathless voice of Chief Palmer, a marathon runner, after dashing up dozens of flights; the assurances from firefighters to him that they are coming on his heels; the effort to create a medical staging area for the wounded on the 40th floor.
But nowhere on the tape is there any indication that firefighters had the slightest indication that the tower had become unstable or that it could fall.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: hellobruce
Do you have any facts that "pull" means demolish a building?
Irrelevant question. Simply put: what the hell did he actually say now?
Can you offer at least something, that suggests he did indeed say "pull them of"?
And how would that apply to the rest of his explanaition? Exactly. It doesn't make any sense at all.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: hellobruce
Do you have any facts that "pull" means demolish a building?
Irrelevant question. Simply put: what the hell did he actually say now?
Can you offer at least something, that suggests he did indeed say "pull them of"?
And how would that apply to the rest of his explanaition? Exactly. It doesn't make any sense at all.
Hellobruce doesn't care about the facts or truth. He just doesn't like others knowing what he cant comprehend.
When the owner of the World Trade Center 7 said that the fires were not being tended to that the smartest thing to do is PULL IT. Then they watched the building fall. If they didn't control the collapse of WTC 7 it would of become a uncontrolled inferno causing possibly more loss of life and indeed more property damage. They had to pull it and they made the right choice.
World Trade Center 7 was brought down in a controlled manner as many engineers, controlled demolition specialists and architects all agree.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: hellobruce
Do you have any facts that "pull" means demolish a building?
Irrelevant question. Simply put: what the hell did he actually say now?
Can you offer at least something, that suggests he did indeed say "pull them of"?
And how would that apply to the rest of his explanaition? Exactly. It doesn't make any sense at all.
Hellobruce doesn't care about the facts or truth. He just doesn't like others knowing what he cant comprehend.
When the owner of the World Trade Center 7 said that the fires were not being tended to that the smartest thing to do is PULL IT. Then they watched the building fall. If they didn't control the collapse of WTC 7 it would of become a uncontrolled inferno causing possibly more loss of life and indeed more property damage. They had to pull it and they made the right choice.
World Trade Center 7 was brought down in a controlled manner as many engineers, controlled demolition specialists and architects all agree.
originally posted by: scottyirnbru
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: hellobruce
Do you have any facts that "pull" means demolish a building?
Irrelevant question. Simply put: what the hell did he actually say now?
Can you offer at least something, that suggests he did indeed say "pull them of"?
And how would that apply to the rest of his explanaition? Exactly. It doesn't make any sense at all.
Hellobruce doesn't care about the facts or truth. He just doesn't like others knowing what he cant comprehend.
When the owner of the World Trade Center 7 said that the fires were not being tended to that the smartest thing to do is PULL IT. Then they watched the building fall. If they didn't control the collapse of WTC 7 it would of become a uncontrolled inferno causing possibly more loss of life and indeed more property damage. They had to pull it and they made the right choice.
World Trade Center 7 was brought down in a controlled manner as many engineers, controlled demolition specialists and architects all agree.
How do you think they controlled the collapse?
originally posted by: jaffo
originally posted by: scottyirnbru
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: hellobruce
Do you have any facts that "pull" means demolish a building?
Irrelevant question. Simply put: what the hell did he actually say now?
Can you offer at least something, that suggests he did indeed say "pull them of"?
And how would that apply to the rest of his explanaition? Exactly. It doesn't make any sense at all.
Hellobruce doesn't care about the facts or truth. He just doesn't like others knowing what he cant comprehend.
When the owner of the World Trade Center 7 said that the fires were not being tended to that the smartest thing to do is PULL IT. Then they watched the building fall. If they didn't control the collapse of WTC 7 it would of become a uncontrolled inferno causing possibly more loss of life and indeed more property damage. They had to pull it and they made the right choice.
World Trade Center 7 was brought down in a controlled manner as many engineers, controlled demolition specialists and architects all agree.
How do you think they controlled the collapse?
They didn't. The building was severely damaged and it collapsed.